中华行为医学与脑科学杂志
中華行為醫學與腦科學雜誌
중화행위의학여뇌과학잡지
Chinese Journal of Behavioral Medicine and Brain Science
2015年
8期
732-734
,共3页
李彦章%许丁杰%周竹%黄全红%杨幼平%何丽%程龙
李彥章%許丁傑%週竹%黃全紅%楊幼平%何麗%程龍
리언장%허정걸%주죽%황전홍%양유평%하려%정룡
心理弹性%社会融合%残疾人
心理彈性%社會融閤%殘疾人
심리탄성%사회융합%잔질인
Resilience%Social integration%Disabled people
目的 探讨残疾人心理弹性特点及与社会融合的关系.方法 采用方便抽样,对702名残疾人进行心理弹性量表、残疾人社会融合量表以及自编一般情况表的调查.结果 残疾人心理弹性总分[(53.27± 18.21)分]低于中国社区人群[(65.4±13.9)分],差异有统计学意义(t=-13.19,P<0.01).来自农村、年轻(≤24岁)或年老(≥60岁)、先天残疾、家庭经济困难、无保险的残疾人心理弹性偏差(P<0.05或P<0.01),有大学及以上文化程度、已婚、在职、家庭氛围温暖和谐的残疾人心理弹性较好(P<0.05或P<0.01);心理弹性总分及其三因素与社会融合呈显著正相关(r=0.38~0.66,P<0.01);心理弹性高分组在社会融合总分及各维度上均高于心理弹性低分组(t=11.60~ 19.02,P<0.01);坚韧性和力量直接影响社会融合三大维度(路径系数分别为0.18~0.46,P<0.01).结论 残疾人的心理弹性偏低,与社会融合密切相关,加强残疾人坚韧性和力量的训练有利于提高残疾人的社会融合.
目的 探討殘疾人心理彈性特點及與社會融閤的關繫.方法 採用方便抽樣,對702名殘疾人進行心理彈性量錶、殘疾人社會融閤量錶以及自編一般情況錶的調查.結果 殘疾人心理彈性總分[(53.27± 18.21)分]低于中國社區人群[(65.4±13.9)分],差異有統計學意義(t=-13.19,P<0.01).來自農村、年輕(≤24歲)或年老(≥60歲)、先天殘疾、傢庭經濟睏難、無保險的殘疾人心理彈性偏差(P<0.05或P<0.01),有大學及以上文化程度、已婚、在職、傢庭氛圍溫暖和諧的殘疾人心理彈性較好(P<0.05或P<0.01);心理彈性總分及其三因素與社會融閤呈顯著正相關(r=0.38~0.66,P<0.01);心理彈性高分組在社會融閤總分及各維度上均高于心理彈性低分組(t=11.60~ 19.02,P<0.01);堅韌性和力量直接影響社會融閤三大維度(路徑繫數分彆為0.18~0.46,P<0.01).結論 殘疾人的心理彈性偏低,與社會融閤密切相關,加彊殘疾人堅韌性和力量的訓練有利于提高殘疾人的社會融閤.
목적 탐토잔질인심리탄성특점급여사회융합적관계.방법 채용방편추양,대702명잔질인진행심리탄성량표、잔질인사회융합량표이급자편일반정황표적조사.결과 잔질인심리탄성총분[(53.27± 18.21)분]저우중국사구인군[(65.4±13.9)분],차이유통계학의의(t=-13.19,P<0.01).래자농촌、년경(≤24세)혹년로(≥60세)、선천잔질、가정경제곤난、무보험적잔질인심리탄성편차(P<0.05혹P<0.01),유대학급이상문화정도、이혼、재직、가정분위온난화해적잔질인심리탄성교호(P<0.05혹P<0.01);심리탄성총분급기삼인소여사회융합정현저정상관(r=0.38~0.66,P<0.01);심리탄성고분조재사회융합총분급각유도상균고우심리탄성저분조(t=11.60~ 19.02,P<0.01);견인성화역량직접영향사회융합삼대유도(로경계수분별위0.18~0.46,P<0.01).결론 잔질인적심리탄성편저,여사회융합밀절상관,가강잔질인견인성화역량적훈련유리우제고잔질인적사회융합.
Objective To explore the characteristics of resilience and the relationships between resilience and social integration of disabled people.Methods By convenient sampling,a total of 702 disabled people were investigated by Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale,Social Integration Scale of the Disabled and self-made general questionnaire.Results The score of resilience of disabled people(53.27± 18.21) was lower than chinese community people(65.4± 13.9,t=-13.19,P<0.01).The resilience scores were significantly lower of the disabled people who came from rural areas,younger(≤ 24 years old) or older(≥ 60 years old),and were disabled from birth had poor family economic conditions,and had no insurances(P<0.05,P<0.01).But the disabled people who had university degree or above,married,working,and had warm and harmonious family atmosphere,had significantly higher resilience scores (P<0.05,P<0.01).The vesilience and three sub-factors were significantly correlated with social integration (r=0.38-0.66,P<0.01).The high resilience group had higher score in integration and three dimensions compared with the low resilience group(t=11.60-19.02,P<0.01).Tenacity and strength directly influenced the three dimensions of social integration (the path coefficient were 0.18-0.46,P<0.01).Conclusion The resilience of the disabled people is lower,and there are close relationships between resilience and social integration.The training of tenacity and strength is beneficial to social integration of the disabled people.