中华泌尿外科杂志
中華泌尿外科雜誌
중화비뇨외과잡지
Chinese Journal of Urology
2015年
10期
782-785
,共4页
方伟林%张正望%钱伟庆%郑吉琼%叶茂飞
方偉林%張正望%錢偉慶%鄭吉瓊%葉茂飛
방위림%장정망%전위경%정길경%협무비
尿失禁,压力性%尿道中段悬吊术%吊带
尿失禁,壓力性%尿道中段懸弔術%弔帶
뇨실금,압력성%뇨도중단현조술%조대
Urinary incontinence,stress%Transobturator approach for transvaginal tape%Sling
目的:探讨经闭孔无张力吊带尿道中段悬吊术( inside-out transobturator transvaginal tape,TVT-O)治疗女性中重度单纯性压力性尿失禁( SUI)的安全性及中长期疗效。方法回顾性分析2008年1月至2013年12月接受TVT-O治疗的女性中重度单纯性SUI患者236例的临床资料。年龄44~88岁,平均(56±9)岁。主要症状为腹压增加及起立活动时频繁出现的尿失禁,均需使用尿垫。 Valsalva诱发试验和指压试验均提示为 SUI。国际尿失禁咨询委员会尿失禁问卷简表( international consultation committee on incontinence questionnaire short form , ICI-Q-SF )评分平均为(15.6±3.9)分。分析236例的术中、术后并发症,并通过ICI-Q-SF评分、诱发实验、尿失禁事件发生频率和尿动力学检查对随访期≥6个月者的主客观疗效进行评估。根据术式分为单行TVT-O的TVT-O组和因伴有盆底脱垂同时行盆底修复术的TVT-O+盆底修复组。根据随访时间分为中期组(随访时间6个月~3年)和长期组(随访时间>3年)。结果本组236例中,术中发生膀胱穿孔和阴道内吊带外露各1例(0.4%);术后发生腹股沟/穿刺点疼痛36例(19.1%),新发尿频18例(9.5%),尿潴留/排尿困难8例(4.2%),其中2例排尿困难患者经尿道扩张+吊带松解后症状仍然存在,需长期间歇自助导尿,其余患者予观察、对症治疗或手术治疗后症状均缓解。189例随访时间≥6个月,平均随访时间(35.0±12.5)个月,其中TVT-O组135例,TVT-O+盆底修复组54例;中期组116例(61.4%),长期组73例(38.6%)。临床治愈率为88.9%(168/189),临床改善率为9.5%(18/189)。术后ICI-Q-SF评分为(6.7±2.3)分,与术前比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。中期组和长期组的客观疗效(治愈率+改善率)分别为97.4%和95.9%,差异无统计学意义( P>0.05);术后ICI-Q-SF评分分别为(5.8±1.2)分和(7.9±2.0)分,与术前[(14.3±2.8)分和(16.7±3.4)分]比较,差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。 TVT-O组和TVT-O+盆底修复组的客观疗效(治愈率+改善率)分别为97.8%和100.0%,差异无统计学意义( P>0.05)。结论 TVT-O治疗女性中重度SUI总体安全有效,中长期疗效持久稳定,且其疗效与是否行盆底修复术无明显相关性。
目的:探討經閉孔無張力弔帶尿道中段懸弔術( inside-out transobturator transvaginal tape,TVT-O)治療女性中重度單純性壓力性尿失禁( SUI)的安全性及中長期療效。方法迴顧性分析2008年1月至2013年12月接受TVT-O治療的女性中重度單純性SUI患者236例的臨床資料。年齡44~88歲,平均(56±9)歲。主要癥狀為腹壓增加及起立活動時頻繁齣現的尿失禁,均需使用尿墊。 Valsalva誘髮試驗和指壓試驗均提示為 SUI。國際尿失禁咨詢委員會尿失禁問捲簡錶( international consultation committee on incontinence questionnaire short form , ICI-Q-SF )評分平均為(15.6±3.9)分。分析236例的術中、術後併髮癥,併通過ICI-Q-SF評分、誘髮實驗、尿失禁事件髮生頻率和尿動力學檢查對隨訪期≥6箇月者的主客觀療效進行評估。根據術式分為單行TVT-O的TVT-O組和因伴有盆底脫垂同時行盆底脩複術的TVT-O+盆底脩複組。根據隨訪時間分為中期組(隨訪時間6箇月~3年)和長期組(隨訪時間>3年)。結果本組236例中,術中髮生膀胱穿孔和陰道內弔帶外露各1例(0.4%);術後髮生腹股溝/穿刺點疼痛36例(19.1%),新髮尿頻18例(9.5%),尿潴留/排尿睏難8例(4.2%),其中2例排尿睏難患者經尿道擴張+弔帶鬆解後癥狀仍然存在,需長期間歇自助導尿,其餘患者予觀察、對癥治療或手術治療後癥狀均緩解。189例隨訪時間≥6箇月,平均隨訪時間(35.0±12.5)箇月,其中TVT-O組135例,TVT-O+盆底脩複組54例;中期組116例(61.4%),長期組73例(38.6%)。臨床治愈率為88.9%(168/189),臨床改善率為9.5%(18/189)。術後ICI-Q-SF評分為(6.7±2.3)分,與術前比較差異有統計學意義(P<0.05)。中期組和長期組的客觀療效(治愈率+改善率)分彆為97.4%和95.9%,差異無統計學意義( P>0.05);術後ICI-Q-SF評分分彆為(5.8±1.2)分和(7.9±2.0)分,與術前[(14.3±2.8)分和(16.7±3.4)分]比較,差異均無統計學意義(P>0.05)。 TVT-O組和TVT-O+盆底脩複組的客觀療效(治愈率+改善率)分彆為97.8%和100.0%,差異無統計學意義( P>0.05)。結論 TVT-O治療女性中重度SUI總體安全有效,中長期療效持久穩定,且其療效與是否行盆底脩複術無明顯相關性。
목적:탐토경폐공무장력조대뇨도중단현조술( inside-out transobturator transvaginal tape,TVT-O)치료녀성중중도단순성압력성뇨실금( SUI)적안전성급중장기료효。방법회고성분석2008년1월지2013년12월접수TVT-O치료적녀성중중도단순성SUI환자236례적림상자료。년령44~88세,평균(56±9)세。주요증상위복압증가급기립활동시빈번출현적뇨실금,균수사용뇨점。 Valsalva유발시험화지압시험균제시위 SUI。국제뇨실금자순위원회뇨실금문권간표( international consultation committee on incontinence questionnaire short form , ICI-Q-SF )평분평균위(15.6±3.9)분。분석236례적술중、술후병발증,병통과ICI-Q-SF평분、유발실험、뇨실금사건발생빈솔화뇨동역학검사대수방기≥6개월자적주객관료효진행평고。근거술식분위단행TVT-O적TVT-O조화인반유분저탈수동시행분저수복술적TVT-O+분저수복조。근거수방시간분위중기조(수방시간6개월~3년)화장기조(수방시간>3년)。결과본조236례중,술중발생방광천공화음도내조대외로각1례(0.4%);술후발생복고구/천자점동통36례(19.1%),신발뇨빈18례(9.5%),뇨저류/배뇨곤난8례(4.2%),기중2례배뇨곤난환자경뇨도확장+조대송해후증상잉연존재,수장기간헐자조도뇨,기여환자여관찰、대증치료혹수술치료후증상균완해。189례수방시간≥6개월,평균수방시간(35.0±12.5)개월,기중TVT-O조135례,TVT-O+분저수복조54례;중기조116례(61.4%),장기조73례(38.6%)。림상치유솔위88.9%(168/189),림상개선솔위9.5%(18/189)。술후ICI-Q-SF평분위(6.7±2.3)분,여술전비교차이유통계학의의(P<0.05)。중기조화장기조적객관료효(치유솔+개선솔)분별위97.4%화95.9%,차이무통계학의의( P>0.05);술후ICI-Q-SF평분분별위(5.8±1.2)분화(7.9±2.0)분,여술전[(14.3±2.8)분화(16.7±3.4)분]비교,차이균무통계학의의(P>0.05)。 TVT-O조화TVT-O+분저수복조적객관료효(치유솔+개선솔)분별위97.8%화100.0%,차이무통계학의의( P>0.05)。결론 TVT-O치료녀성중중도SUI총체안전유효,중장기료효지구은정,차기료효여시부행분저수복술무명현상관성。
Objective To evaluate the complications and long-term efficacy of inside-out transobturator transvaginal tape ( TVT-O) for the treatment of stress urinary incontinence ( SUI) .Methods From January 2008 to December 2013,236 consecutive female patients (mean age 56 ±9 years,range 44-88 years)with the symptom of incontinence when abdominal pressure increasing (such as walking), underwent TVT-O operation.All these patients needed pads and were diagnosed with SUI by cough test and Marshall -bonny test before surgery , with the mean international consultation committee on incontinence questionnaire short form ( ICI-Q-SF) score of 15.6 ±3.9.Two grouping methods were used:the mid-term group including patients whose follow-up time was between 6 months and 3 years, the long-term group including patients whose follow-up time >3 years,the group of patients who underwent TVT-O only and the group of patients who underwent TVT-O plus pelvic floor repair at the same time . Their clinical and follow-up data , intraoperative and postoperative complications , subjective and objective effects were recorded and analyzed.Results Of these 236 patients,there were 1 case of bladder perforation (0.4%) and 1 case of intraoperative sling exposure to vagina ( 0.4%) .Postoperative complications included 36 ( 19.1%) groin/puncture point pain ,18 (9.5%) de novo frequency of micturition ,8 (4.2%) urinary retention /difficulty of urination.All the complications were relieved after symptomatic treatment or surgery except 2 cases of urinary retention/difficulty of urination.Their symptom kept existing after urethral dilatation and sling dissection and long-term intermittent self-catheterization was needed .One hundred and eighty-nine patients completed more than six months of follow-up, with mean follow-up time of ( 35.0 ±12.5 ) months.One hundred and sixteen (61.4%) cases was arranged to mid-term group and 73(38.6%) was arranged to long-term group.88.9%patients ( 168/189 ) were cured objectively and 9.5% patients ( 18/189 ) improved. There was also a significant subjective improvement ( ICI-Q-SF scores:15.6 ±3.9 preoperative versus 6.7 ± 2.3 postoperative,P<0.01).There was no significant difference of both objective and subjective efficacy between mid-term group and long-term group ( cured +improved rate 97.4% versus 95.9%;ICI-Q-SF scores 14.3 ±2.8 versus 16.7 ±3.4 preoperative ,5.8 ±1.2 versus 7.9 ±2.0 postoperative , P>0.05 ) . Patients who underwent TVT-O and those who underwent TVT-O +pelvic floor repair had no significant difference in efficacy (cured +improved rate 97.8%versus 100.0%,P>0.05).Conclusion TVT-O is a safe,effective and durable treatment for SUI , whether or not with concomitant procedure of pelvic floor repairment.