中华泌尿外科杂志
中華泌尿外科雜誌
중화비뇨외과잡지
Chinese Journal of Urology
2015年
10期
765-767
,共3页
韩雨%于芹超%曹延炜%王永华%岳德志
韓雨%于芹超%曹延煒%王永華%嶽德誌
한우%우근초%조연위%왕영화%악덕지
膀胱肿瘤%T1 G3%尿路上皮癌%亚分期
膀胱腫瘤%T1 G3%尿路上皮癌%亞分期
방광종류%T1 G3%뇨로상피암%아분기
Urinary bladder neoplasms%T1 G3%Urothelial carcinoma%Substaging
目的:探讨病理亚分期在T1 G3膀胱尿路上皮癌患者预后评价中的意义以及T1me ( T1-微浸润和T1-广泛浸润)亚分期系统作为T1 G3患者亚分期方法的可行性。方法选择原发T1 G3膀胱尿路上皮癌患者87例,其中56例患者的基础资料、病理阅片及随访完整。按照T1me分期法,将56例T1G3膀胱尿路上皮癌患者经尿道膀胱肿瘤电切术后获得的病理标本分为T1m期17例(A组)和T1e期39例( B组),然后分析患者的预后情况。基础资料比较采用χ2检验,5年无复发生存率、5年无进展生存率比较采用Kaplan-Meier生存分析及Log-rank检验。结果两组患者年龄、肿瘤大小、是否多发、膀胱灌注治疗等方面比较差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。5年无复发生存率(P=0.037)、5年无进展生存率(P=0.045)比较差异均有统计学意义,T1m期患者预后优于T1e期患者。结论病理亚分期是判断原发T1 G3膀胱尿路上皮癌患者预后的重要因素。 T1me分期法作为T1 G3膀胱尿路上皮癌病理亚分期的分期方法客观、实用、易行。
目的:探討病理亞分期在T1 G3膀胱尿路上皮癌患者預後評價中的意義以及T1me ( T1-微浸潤和T1-廣汎浸潤)亞分期繫統作為T1 G3患者亞分期方法的可行性。方法選擇原髮T1 G3膀胱尿路上皮癌患者87例,其中56例患者的基礎資料、病理閱片及隨訪完整。按照T1me分期法,將56例T1G3膀胱尿路上皮癌患者經尿道膀胱腫瘤電切術後穫得的病理標本分為T1m期17例(A組)和T1e期39例( B組),然後分析患者的預後情況。基礎資料比較採用χ2檢驗,5年無複髮生存率、5年無進展生存率比較採用Kaplan-Meier生存分析及Log-rank檢驗。結果兩組患者年齡、腫瘤大小、是否多髮、膀胱灌註治療等方麵比較差異均無統計學意義(P>0.05)。5年無複髮生存率(P=0.037)、5年無進展生存率(P=0.045)比較差異均有統計學意義,T1m期患者預後優于T1e期患者。結論病理亞分期是判斷原髮T1 G3膀胱尿路上皮癌患者預後的重要因素。 T1me分期法作為T1 G3膀胱尿路上皮癌病理亞分期的分期方法客觀、實用、易行。
목적:탐토병리아분기재T1 G3방광뇨로상피암환자예후평개중적의의이급T1me ( T1-미침윤화T1-엄범침윤)아분기계통작위T1 G3환자아분기방법적가행성。방법선택원발T1 G3방광뇨로상피암환자87례,기중56례환자적기출자료、병리열편급수방완정。안조T1me분기법,장56례T1G3방광뇨로상피암환자경뇨도방광종류전절술후획득적병리표본분위T1m기17례(A조)화T1e기39례( B조),연후분석환자적예후정황。기출자료비교채용χ2검험,5년무복발생존솔、5년무진전생존솔비교채용Kaplan-Meier생존분석급Log-rank검험。결과량조환자년령、종류대소、시부다발、방광관주치료등방면비교차이균무통계학의의(P>0.05)。5년무복발생존솔(P=0.037)、5년무진전생존솔(P=0.045)비교차이균유통계학의의,T1m기환자예후우우T1e기환자。결론병리아분기시판단원발T1 G3방광뇨로상피암환자예후적중요인소。 T1me분기법작위T1 G3방광뇨로상피암병리아분기적분기방법객관、실용、역행。
Objective To evaluate the impact of sub-stage on the clinical prognosis of T 1 G3 and evaluate the feasibility of the T1me system in pT1G3 sub-staging.Methods The clinical data,pathological specimen and follow-up data were collected from 56 patients out of 87 patients diagnosed with initial high-grade T1 bladder urothelial carcinoma .The patients were divided into Group A [ T1-microinvasive (T1m),17 cases] and group B [T1-extensive-invasive (T1e),39 cases] according to pathological evaluation after transurethral resection.Clinical parameters were analyzed with Chi-square test,and recurrence-free and progression free survival were obtained by Kaplan-Meier analysis and Log-rank test.Results Age,tumor size,number and intravesical instilled medication showed no significant differences between the 2 groups ( P>0.05 ) .There were significant differences of 5-year recurrence-free rate ( P =0.037 ) and progression-free survival rate ( P =0.045 ) between the 2 groups, and the prognosis of group A was significantly better than that of group B .Conclusion The pathological sub-stage is an important predictor in initial high-grade T1 bladder urothelial carcinoma patients , and the T1me system is objective and feasible.