中国健康心理学杂志
中國健康心理學雜誌
중국건강심이학잡지
China Journal of Health Psychology
2015年
11期
1623-1625
,共3页
帕罗西汀%心理干预%青少年%社交焦虑症
帕囉西汀%心理榦預%青少年%社交焦慮癥
파라서정%심리간예%청소년%사교초필증
Paroxetine%Psychological intervention%Adolescence%Social anxiety disorder
目的:探讨帕罗西汀结合心理干预治疗青少年社交焦虑症的临床疗效. 方法:68例青少年社交焦虑症患者作为研究组予以8周帕罗西汀结合心理干预治疗,治疗前及治疗8周后均接受社交回避及苦恼量表( SAD)、羞怯量表(SS)及脑电超慢涨落图分析技术(ET)检查,比较治疗前后的差异. 结果:①研究组治疗的总有效率为88 .24%,其中,痊愈55 .88%,显著进步17 .65%,进步14 .71%,无效11 .86%;②治疗8周后,研究组SSD、SS得分均较治疗前显著性降低,较治疗前差异均具有统计学意义(t=6.43,3.16;P<0.05);③研究组治疗8周后脑内神经递质活性产生一定变化,其中,抑制性神经递质GABA、5-HT、NE活动性均增强,较治疗前差异具有统计学意义(t=4.78,11.35,5.34;P<0.05). 结论:帕罗西汀结合心理干预治疗青少年社交焦虑症的临床疗效较好,值得推广.
目的:探討帕囉西汀結閤心理榦預治療青少年社交焦慮癥的臨床療效. 方法:68例青少年社交焦慮癥患者作為研究組予以8週帕囉西汀結閤心理榦預治療,治療前及治療8週後均接受社交迴避及苦惱量錶( SAD)、羞怯量錶(SS)及腦電超慢漲落圖分析技術(ET)檢查,比較治療前後的差異. 結果:①研究組治療的總有效率為88 .24%,其中,痊愈55 .88%,顯著進步17 .65%,進步14 .71%,無效11 .86%;②治療8週後,研究組SSD、SS得分均較治療前顯著性降低,較治療前差異均具有統計學意義(t=6.43,3.16;P<0.05);③研究組治療8週後腦內神經遞質活性產生一定變化,其中,抑製性神經遞質GABA、5-HT、NE活動性均增彊,較治療前差異具有統計學意義(t=4.78,11.35,5.34;P<0.05). 結論:帕囉西汀結閤心理榦預治療青少年社交焦慮癥的臨床療效較好,值得推廣.
목적:탐토파라서정결합심리간예치료청소년사교초필증적림상료효. 방법:68례청소년사교초필증환자작위연구조여이8주파라서정결합심리간예치료,치료전급치료8주후균접수사교회피급고뇌량표( SAD)、수겁량표(SS)급뇌전초만창락도분석기술(ET)검사,비교치료전후적차이. 결과:①연구조치료적총유효솔위88 .24%,기중,전유55 .88%,현저진보17 .65%,진보14 .71%,무효11 .86%;②치료8주후,연구조SSD、SS득분균교치료전현저성강저,교치료전차이균구유통계학의의(t=6.43,3.16;P<0.05);③연구조치료8주후뇌내신경체질활성산생일정변화,기중,억제성신경체질GABA、5-HT、NE활동성균증강,교치료전차이구유통계학의의(t=4.78,11.35,5.34;P<0.05). 결론:파라서정결합심리간예치료청소년사교초필증적림상료효교호,치득추엄.
Objective:To evaluate the clinical efficacy of paroxetine combined with psychological in-tervention in the treatment of adolescent social anxiety disorder.Methods:68 cases of adolescences with social anxiety disorder as study group were given 8 weeks'paroxetine therapy combined with psychological intervention.The group underwent Social Avoidance and Distress Scale ( SAD ) , Shyness Scale ( SS ) and Encepha1of1uctuograph Technology(ET)before treatment and after 8 weeks of treatment.The differences before and after treatment were compared.Results:①The total effective rate of study group therapy was 88.24%,recovery accounting for 55.88%,significant progress accounting for 17.65%,progress account-ing for 14.71%,invalid accounting for 11.86%.② After 8 weeks of treatment,SSD,SS scores in the study group were significantly lower than those before treatment ,and the differences were statistically sig-nificant(t=6.43,3.16;P<0.05).③The activity of neurotransmitters in the brain of study group after 8 weeks of treatment produced certain changes ,in which the inhibitory neurotransmitter GABA ,5-HT,NE activity were increased compared with pre -treatment.The differences were statistically significant ( t=4.78,11.35,5.34;P<0.05).Conclusion:The clinical efficacy of paroxetine combined with psychologi-cal intervention in the treatment of adolescent social anxiety disorder is good and worthy of promotion.
