中国健康心理学杂志
中國健康心理學雜誌
중국건강심이학잡지
China Journal of Health Psychology
2015年
11期
1620-1623
,共4页
宋君伟%刘国友%张文佳%刘洋%李宝清
宋君偉%劉國友%張文佳%劉洋%李寶清
송군위%류국우%장문가%류양%리보청
家庭%社区%精神分裂症%社会功能
傢庭%社區%精神分裂癥%社會功能
가정%사구%정신분렬증%사회공능
Family%Community%Schizophrenia%Social function
目的:探讨家庭和社区康复对农村社区精神分裂症患者的作用. 方法:将200名精神分裂症患者随机分为干预组和对照组,对干预组患者实施综合式干预,经过6个月的观察,在0、3、6个月用自制一般情况调查表、功能大体评定量表(GAF)、社会功能筛选评定量表(SDSS)、现有能力及康复效果评估表进行评定. 结果:两组间GAF量表在第3、6个月时有显著性或极显著差异(t=3.529,5.214;P=0.001,0.000). 两组间SDSS在第6个月时有显著差异(t=-2.626,P<0.01). 两组间现有能力及康复效果评估表中的讲究卫生能力、生活能力、工作情况等分量表及总量表在第3个月时有显著差异( t=-2 .195 ,-2 .230 ,-2 .590;P<0 .05 );第6个月时有显著或极显著差异( t=-2 .491 ,-2 .945 ,-3 .856;P<0 .05或0 .001 ). 结论:综合家庭、社区及部门间合作的康复形式,有利于促进精神分裂症患者社会功能恢复.
目的:探討傢庭和社區康複對農村社區精神分裂癥患者的作用. 方法:將200名精神分裂癥患者隨機分為榦預組和對照組,對榦預組患者實施綜閤式榦預,經過6箇月的觀察,在0、3、6箇月用自製一般情況調查錶、功能大體評定量錶(GAF)、社會功能篩選評定量錶(SDSS)、現有能力及康複效果評估錶進行評定. 結果:兩組間GAF量錶在第3、6箇月時有顯著性或極顯著差異(t=3.529,5.214;P=0.001,0.000). 兩組間SDSS在第6箇月時有顯著差異(t=-2.626,P<0.01). 兩組間現有能力及康複效果評估錶中的講究衛生能力、生活能力、工作情況等分量錶及總量錶在第3箇月時有顯著差異( t=-2 .195 ,-2 .230 ,-2 .590;P<0 .05 );第6箇月時有顯著或極顯著差異( t=-2 .491 ,-2 .945 ,-3 .856;P<0 .05或0 .001 ). 結論:綜閤傢庭、社區及部門間閤作的康複形式,有利于促進精神分裂癥患者社會功能恢複.
목적:탐토가정화사구강복대농촌사구정신분렬증환자적작용. 방법:장200명정신분렬증환자수궤분위간예조화대조조,대간예조환자실시종합식간예,경과6개월적관찰,재0、3、6개월용자제일반정황조사표、공능대체평정량표(GAF)、사회공능사선평정량표(SDSS)、현유능력급강복효과평고표진행평정. 결과:량조간GAF량표재제3、6개월시유현저성혹겁현저차이(t=3.529,5.214;P=0.001,0.000). 량조간SDSS재제6개월시유현저차이(t=-2.626,P<0.01). 량조간현유능력급강복효과평고표중적강구위생능력、생활능력、공작정황등분량표급총량표재제3개월시유현저차이( t=-2 .195 ,-2 .230 ,-2 .590;P<0 .05 );제6개월시유현저혹겁현저차이( t=-2 .491 ,-2 .945 ,-3 .856;P<0 .05혹0 .001 ). 결론:종합가정、사구급부문간합작적강복형식,유리우촉진정신분렬증환자사회공능회복.
Objective:To investigate the effect of family and community rehabilitation on rural commu-nity schizophrenic patients.Methods:200 patients with schizophrenia were randomly divided into inter-vention group and control group;Intervention group patients took the intervention and completed the homemade general situation questionnaire ,function overall rating scale ( GAF) ,social function filter rating scale(SDSS),the existing ability and rehabilitation evaluation table at 0,3,6 months of the intervention. Results:GAF scale between the two groups in 3,6 months had significant differences(t=3.529,5.214;P<0.01);SDSS between the two groups in 6 months had significant difference (t=2.626.P<0.01),re-spectively.Existing capabilities and rehabilitation evaluation table between the two groups in the ability to pay attention to health ,life,work situation subscales and total table had significant differences in 3 months (t=2.195,2.230,2.590;P<0.05),and 6 months(t=-2.491,2.945,3.856;P<0.05).Conclusion:Comprehensive rehabilitation cooperation of families ,communities ,and government departments are help-ful for promoting the social function of patients with schizophrenia.