中外医疗
中外醫療
중외의료
China Foreign Medical Treatment
2015年
25期
155-156
,共2页
曾辉%黄亮%颜彪华%朝艳玲%王宏川
曾輝%黃亮%顏彪華%朝豔玲%王宏川
증휘%황량%안표화%조염령%왕굉천
吲达帕胺%非洛地平%高血压%不良反应%疗效
吲達帕胺%非洛地平%高血壓%不良反應%療效
신체파알%비락지평%고혈압%불량반응%료효
Indapamide%Felodipine%Hypertension%Adverse reactions%Efficacy
目的:研究分析吲达帕胺与非洛地平治疗高血压的临床效果和不良反应情况。方法整群选择2013年5月-2015年5月该院收治的高血压患者106例,随机分为对照组、观察组,各53例。对照组采用非洛地平治疗,观察组采用吲达帕胺治疗,比较分析两组临床治疗有效率、不良反应发生率、治疗前后动态血压及动态血压负荷值情况。结果观察组临床治疗有效率为96.23%,明显高于对照组的79.25%,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);观察组不良反应发生率为1.89%,显著低于对照组的16.98%,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);两组治疗后动态血压和动态血压负荷值显著低于治疗前,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),观察组显著低于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论相比于非洛地平治疗,吲达帕胺治疗高血压具有显著的临床效果,能够有效缓解病情,且不良反应较少,更为安全可靠,值得推广。
目的:研究分析吲達帕胺與非洛地平治療高血壓的臨床效果和不良反應情況。方法整群選擇2013年5月-2015年5月該院收治的高血壓患者106例,隨機分為對照組、觀察組,各53例。對照組採用非洛地平治療,觀察組採用吲達帕胺治療,比較分析兩組臨床治療有效率、不良反應髮生率、治療前後動態血壓及動態血壓負荷值情況。結果觀察組臨床治療有效率為96.23%,明顯高于對照組的79.25%,差異有統計學意義(P<0.05);觀察組不良反應髮生率為1.89%,顯著低于對照組的16.98%,差異有統計學意義(P<0.05);兩組治療後動態血壓和動態血壓負荷值顯著低于治療前,差異有統計學意義(P<0.05),觀察組顯著低于對照組,差異有統計學意義(P<0.05)。結論相比于非洛地平治療,吲達帕胺治療高血壓具有顯著的臨床效果,能夠有效緩解病情,且不良反應較少,更為安全可靠,值得推廣。
목적:연구분석신체파알여비락지평치료고혈압적림상효과화불량반응정황。방법정군선택2013년5월-2015년5월해원수치적고혈압환자106례,수궤분위대조조、관찰조,각53례。대조조채용비락지평치료,관찰조채용신체파알치료,비교분석량조림상치료유효솔、불량반응발생솔、치료전후동태혈압급동태혈압부하치정황。결과관찰조림상치료유효솔위96.23%,명현고우대조조적79.25%,차이유통계학의의(P<0.05);관찰조불량반응발생솔위1.89%,현저저우대조조적16.98%,차이유통계학의의(P<0.05);량조치료후동태혈압화동태혈압부하치현저저우치료전,차이유통계학의의(P<0.05),관찰조현저저우대조조,차이유통계학의의(P<0.05)。결론상비우비락지평치료,신체파알치료고혈압구유현저적림상효과,능구유효완해병정,차불량반응교소,경위안전가고,치득추엄。
Objective Analysis indapamide and felodipine hypertension clinical effects and adverse reactions. Methods Select 106 patients with hypertension from May 2013 to May 2015 in our hospital were randomly divided into control group, the observation group, 53 cases each. The control group, felodipine, observation group indapamide treatment, comparative effectiveness analysis of two clinical treatment, incidence of adverse reactions after treatment ambulatory blood pressure and ambulatory blood pressure load value situation. Results Effective clinical observation group was 96.23%, significantly higher than 79.25%, the difference was sig-nificant (P<0.05); the incidence of adverse reactions observed group of 1.89%, significantly lower than the 16.98%in the control group, the difference was significant (P<0.05);ambulatory blood pressure and ambulatory blood pressure load values after treatment was significantly lower than before treatment, the difference was significant (P<0.05), the observation group was significantly lower than the control group, the difference was significant (P<0.05). Conclusion Compared to felodipine, indapamide treatment of hy-pertension has a significant clinical effect, can effectively alleviate the condition, and fewer adverse reactions, more secure and re-liable, worthy of promotion.