CAJ | 학술논문

目的：对2种微创术式对治疗输尿管嵌顿性结石的治疗效果进行对比。方法：选取我院收治嵌顿性输尿管结石患者65例，分为32例GRLUL组、33例PCNL组，对2组患者临床资料进行回顾性的分析。结果：研究发现，GRLUL组手术时间与PCNL组时间比较，GRLUL组结石清除率高于PCNL组，差异无统计学意义（p＞0．05）。结论：PCNL和GRLUL在输尿管嵌顿性结石治疗中均有满意的结石清除率，术后恢复快及术后并发症少的优点。
목적：대2충미창술식대치료수뇨관감돈성결석적치료효과진행대비。방법：선취아원수치감돈성수뇨관결석환자65례，분위32례GRLUL조、33례PCNL조，대2조환자림상자료진행회고성적분석。결과：연구발현，GRLUL조수술시간여PCNL조시간비교，GRLUL조결석청제솔고우PCNL조，차이무통계학의의（p＞0．05）。결론：PCNL화GRLUL재수뇨관감돈성결석치료중균유만의적결석청제솔，술후회복쾌급술후병발증소적우점。
Objective:The two minimally invasive surgical treatment of ureteral calculi incarcerated treatment were compared.Meth-ods:Patients with ureteral stones in our hospital incarcerated 65 cases were divided into 32 cases GRLUL group, 33 cases of PCNL group, two groups of patients for clinical data were analyzed retrospectively.Results:The study found that, GRLUL operative time compared with the time PCNL group, the difference was statistically significant (p <0.05).Conclusions:PCNL and GRLUL are satisfied stone clear-ance rate in the treatment of ureteral calculi incarcerated, rapid postoperative recovery advantages and fewer complications.