西北师范大学学报(自然科学版)
西北師範大學學報(自然科學版)
서북사범대학학보(자연과학판)
Journal of Northwest Normal University (Natural Science)
2015年
5期
99-106
,共8页
SBDART模型%6S模型%大气校正%总辐射
SBDART模型%6S模型%大氣校正%總輻射
SBDART모형%6S모형%대기교정%총복사
6S model%SBDART model%atmospheric correction%total radiation
利用张掖市大野口马莲滩草地站测得的2009年5月6—7日(8:15~18:45)2天不同时次的地表总辐射数据,对运用2种辐射传输模型SBDART和6S分别模拟计算获得的地表总辐射结果进行比较,验证评价其模拟精度,用大气理论分析工具对影响模拟结果的大气参数进行敏感度分析.结果表明,在天气良好状况下, SBDART模型和6S模型都是可靠的大气校正模型,但SBDART模型模拟的精度(绝对误差为0.02%~4.97%)比6S模型模拟的精度(绝对误差为-0.05%~12.66%)更高,可以更精确地反演地表真实反射率;在有云条件下,SBDART模型模拟总辐射曲线与实测总辐射曲线走势相近.通过敏感度分析得到各种大气参数对地表总辐射的具体影响程度,包括大气模式、云参数、气溶胶等.
利用張掖市大野口馬蓮灘草地站測得的2009年5月6—7日(8:15~18:45)2天不同時次的地錶總輻射數據,對運用2種輻射傳輸模型SBDART和6S分彆模擬計算穫得的地錶總輻射結果進行比較,驗證評價其模擬精度,用大氣理論分析工具對影響模擬結果的大氣參數進行敏感度分析.結果錶明,在天氣良好狀況下, SBDART模型和6S模型都是可靠的大氣校正模型,但SBDART模型模擬的精度(絕對誤差為0.02%~4.97%)比6S模型模擬的精度(絕對誤差為-0.05%~12.66%)更高,可以更精確地反縯地錶真實反射率;在有雲條件下,SBDART模型模擬總輻射麯線與實測總輻射麯線走勢相近.通過敏感度分析得到各種大氣參數對地錶總輻射的具體影響程度,包括大氣模式、雲參數、氣溶膠等.
이용장액시대야구마련탄초지참측득적2009년5월6—7일(8:15~18:45)2천불동시차적지표총복사수거,대운용2충복사전수모형SBDART화6S분별모의계산획득적지표총복사결과진행비교,험증평개기모의정도,용대기이론분석공구대영향모의결과적대기삼수진행민감도분석.결과표명,재천기량호상황하, SBDART모형화6S모형도시가고적대기교정모형,단SBDART모형모의적정도(절대오차위0.02%~4.97%)비6S모형모의적정도(절대오차위-0.05%~12.66%)경고,가이경정학지반연지표진실반사솔;재유운조건하,SBDART모형모의총복사곡선여실측총복사곡선주세상근.통과민감도분석득도각충대기삼수대지표총복사적구체영향정도,포괄대기모식、운삼수、기용효등.
This paper compared the meteorological data observed in the Grassland station of Dayekou Malian tan in May 6 th—7 th 2009 (8∶15 ~ 18∶45) , with surface solar total radiation data which is simulated respectively by 6S and SBDART models , then verified and assessed the calculation accuracy of solar total radiation . Then SBDART model is used to conduct sensitivity analysis for analyzing the impacts of various atmospheric parameters on the simulation results . The resuts showed that :in the condition of good weather and lacking of specific atmospheric parameters for every time ,both 6S and SBDART models are reliable for atmospheric correction of TM image . However , the accuracy of SBDART is higher than 6S model . The absolute error of SBDART is 0.02% ~4.97% ,and its value of 6S is -0.05% ~12.66% , respectively Thus ,SBDART model is superior to 6S model for the quantitative analysis and inversion ;the specific influence level of every atmospheric parameter to radiation , such as atmospheric model , cloud , and aerosol et al is obtained by sensitivity analysis . This study provides a further scientific basis for higher precision of atmospheric correction utilizing SBDART model in TM remote sensing image over the study area .