医学信息
醫學信息
의학신식
Medical Information
2015年
37期
62-62,63
,共2页
高血压脑出血%立体定向%穿刺抽吸术%临床疗效
高血壓腦齣血%立體定嚮%穿刺抽吸術%臨床療效
고혈압뇌출혈%입체정향%천자추흡술%림상료효
Hypertensive cerebral hemor hage%Stereotactic%Invasive hematoma aspiration%Clinical ef ect
目的:比较立体定向血肿穿刺抽吸术与开颅血肿清除术治疗高血压脑出血的临床疗效。方法将我院82例高血压脑出血患者随机分为立体定向血肿穿刺抽吸术治疗组(观察组)与开颅血肿清除术治疗组(对照组),每组各41例,比较两组患者的临床疗效以及术后并发症情况。结果观察组患者治疗总有效率为92.7%,明显高于对照组患者的75.6%,组间差异有统计学意义(<0.05)。两组患者术后并发症发生率之间的差异无统计学意义(跃0.05)。结论立体定向血肿穿刺抽吸术治疗高血压脑出血的临床疗效优于开颅血肿清除术,且安全性较高。
目的:比較立體定嚮血腫穿刺抽吸術與開顱血腫清除術治療高血壓腦齣血的臨床療效。方法將我院82例高血壓腦齣血患者隨機分為立體定嚮血腫穿刺抽吸術治療組(觀察組)與開顱血腫清除術治療組(對照組),每組各41例,比較兩組患者的臨床療效以及術後併髮癥情況。結果觀察組患者治療總有效率為92.7%,明顯高于對照組患者的75.6%,組間差異有統計學意義(<0.05)。兩組患者術後併髮癥髮生率之間的差異無統計學意義(躍0.05)。結論立體定嚮血腫穿刺抽吸術治療高血壓腦齣血的臨床療效優于開顱血腫清除術,且安全性較高。
목적:비교입체정향혈종천자추흡술여개로혈종청제술치료고혈압뇌출혈적림상료효。방법장아원82례고혈압뇌출혈환자수궤분위입체정향혈종천자추흡술치료조(관찰조)여개로혈종청제술치료조(대조조),매조각41례,비교량조환자적림상료효이급술후병발증정황。결과관찰조환자치료총유효솔위92.7%,명현고우대조조환자적75.6%,조간차이유통계학의의(<0.05)。량조환자술후병발증발생솔지간적차이무통계학의의(약0.05)。결론입체정향혈종천자추흡술치료고혈압뇌출혈적림상료효우우개로혈종청제술,차안전성교고。
Objective To compare the clinical ef ect of stereotactic invasive hematoma aspiration and craniotomy in treatment of hypertensive cerebral hemor hage.Methods 82 cases of hypertensive cerebral hemorrhage were randomly divided into stereotactic invasive hematoma aspiration treatment group (observation group)and craniotomy treatment group (control group),41 cases in each group, compared the clinical ef ect and postoperative complications.Results The total ef ective rate of cases in observation group was 92.7%,significantly higher than that in control group (75.6%),there was significant dif erence between two groups ( <0.05).There was no dif erence of the rate of complications between two groups ( >0.05).Conclusion Stereotactic hematoma aspiration in treatment of hypertensive cerebral hemor hage has bet er clinical ef ect than craniotomy treatment,and has high safety.