中外医疗
中外醫療
중외의료
China Foreign Medical Treatment
2015年
25期
123-125
,共3页
一次性根管治疗%多次根管治疗%临床疗效
一次性根管治療%多次根管治療%臨床療效
일차성근관치료%다차근관치료%림상료효
Single-visit root canal therapy%Traditional root canal therapy%Clinical efficacy
目的：探讨一次性根管治疗术在的牙髓病治疗中的临床疗效。方法对在郑州市第七人民医院2013年1月-2014年12月接受牙体牙髓病治疗的患者的患牙380颗进行根管治疗,在患者知情同意的前提下采用随机数字表法,对患牙随机分组,观察组190颗,采用一次性根管治疗术；对照组190颗,采用多次根管治疗术,观察对比两组患者临床有效率。结果近期疗效显示观察组的总有效率为96.32%(183颗),对照组的总有效率为85.26%(162颗),差异有统计学意义(χ2=13.878,P<0.05)；远期疗效显示观察组的有效率为94.21%(179颗),对照组的有效率为80.53%(153颗),差异有统计学意义(χ2=16.119, P<0.05)；因此,一次性根管治疗术的治疗效果要明显高于多次根管治疗术。结论一次性根管治疗术是一种较为可靠的根管治疗手段,值得临床上推广应用。
目的：探討一次性根管治療術在的牙髓病治療中的臨床療效。方法對在鄭州市第七人民醫院2013年1月-2014年12月接受牙體牙髓病治療的患者的患牙380顆進行根管治療,在患者知情同意的前提下採用隨機數字錶法,對患牙隨機分組,觀察組190顆,採用一次性根管治療術；對照組190顆,採用多次根管治療術,觀察對比兩組患者臨床有效率。結果近期療效顯示觀察組的總有效率為96.32%(183顆),對照組的總有效率為85.26%(162顆),差異有統計學意義(χ2=13.878,P<0.05)；遠期療效顯示觀察組的有效率為94.21%(179顆),對照組的有效率為80.53%(153顆),差異有統計學意義(χ2=16.119, P<0.05)；因此,一次性根管治療術的治療效果要明顯高于多次根管治療術。結論一次性根管治療術是一種較為可靠的根管治療手段,值得臨床上推廣應用。
목적：탐토일차성근관치료술재적아수병치료중적림상료효。방법대재정주시제칠인민의원2013년1월-2014년12월접수아체아수병치료적환자적환아380과진행근관치료,재환자지정동의적전제하채용수궤수자표법,대환아수궤분조,관찰조190과,채용일차성근관치료술；대조조190과,채용다차근관치료술,관찰대비량조환자림상유효솔。결과근기료효현시관찰조적총유효솔위96.32%(183과),대조조적총유효솔위85.26%(162과),차이유통계학의의(χ2=13.878,P<0.05)；원기료효현시관찰조적유효솔위94.21%(179과),대조조적유효솔위80.53%(153과),차이유통계학의의(χ2=16.119, P<0.05)；인차,일차성근관치료술적치료효과요명현고우다차근관치료술。결론일차성근관치료술시일충교위가고적근관치료수단,치득림상상추엄응용。
Objective To explore the clinical effect of one-visit root canal therapy in endodontic diseases. Methods From January 2013 to December 2014, 302 patients (380 teeth) with dental pulp disease root canal therapy in the Seventh People's Hospital of Zhengzhou. Obtaining the patient's informed consent, we divided all the teeth into observation group and control group. The 190 teeth in the observation group were treated with one-visit root canal therapy, while other 190 in the control group received multi-ple-visit root canal therapy. The efficacy was observed and compared between the two groups. Results Study on the short-term ef-ficacy showed that the total effective rate was 96.32% in observation group and 85.26% in control group with significant differ-ences (χ2=13.878, P<0.05);while study on the long term efficacy showed that the total effective rate was 94.21%in the observation group and 80.53%in the control group with significant differences (χ2=16.119, P<0.05). So the curative effect of observation group was better than that of the control group. Conclusion Single-visit root canal therapy is a dependable treatment method which is worthy to be applied widely.
