动物营养学报
動物營養學報
동물영양학보
Chinese Journal Of Animal Nutrition
2015年
10期
3311-3318
,共8页
何玉鹏%郭艳丽%秦士贞%马淑梅%杜进姣%郑琛%赵芳芳
何玉鵬%郭豔麗%秦士貞%馬淑梅%杜進姣%鄭琛%趙芳芳
하옥붕%곽염려%진사정%마숙매%두진교%정침%조방방
马铃薯茎叶%青贮饲料%发酵品质%米糠%小麦麸
馬鈴藷莖葉%青貯飼料%髮酵品質%米糠%小麥麩
마령서경협%청저사료%발효품질%미강%소맥부
potato vines%silage%fermentation quality%rice bran%wheat bran
本试验旨在研究添加米糠和小麦麸对2个品种的马铃薯茎叶青贮品质的影响。采用2×6双因子设计,2个因子分别为马铃薯品种( A)和马铃薯茎叶与米糠、小麦麸的混合比例( B),其中马铃薯品种为庄薯3号( A1)和青薯169号( A2);各混合比例为马铃薯茎叶单独青贮( B1)、85%马铃薯茎叶+15%米糠( B2)、81%马铃薯茎叶+15%米糠+4%小麦麸( B3)、77%马铃薯茎叶+15%米糠+8%小麦麸( B4)、73%马铃薯茎叶+15%米糠+12%小麦麸( B5)、69%马铃薯茎叶+15%米糠+16%小麦麸( B6)。共12个处理,每个处理4个重复。用600 mL玻璃瓶作青贮瓶。室温保存45 d。结果表明,与A1青贮饲料相比,A2青贮饲料有较高的感官评分及干物质、中性洗涤纤维含量(P<0.05),较低的pH及氨态氮、乳酸、丁酸、粗蛋白质含量(P<0.05)。与B1青贮饲料相比,B2青贮饲料有较低的pH及乙酸、丁酸、氨态氮、粗蛋白质含量和较高的乳酸、干物质、中性洗涤纤维含量及感官评分、乳酸/乙酸( P<0.05)。与B2青贮饲料相比,B3青贮饲料进一步降低了青贮饲料的pH及氨态氮、乙酸含量(P<0.05),提高了感官评分、乳酸/乙酸及乳酸、干物质、粗蛋白质、中性洗涤纤维含量。 B4、B5、B6青贮饲料又比B3青贮饲料有较低的氨态氮和丁酸含量(P<0.05),较高的干物质和粗蛋白质含量(P<0.05)。在感官评分、乳酸/乙酸及氨态氮、乳酸、丁酸、干物质含量和上,A、B两因子间存在互作( P<0.05)。对于相同比例的米糠和小麦麸,A2青贮饲料比A1青贮饲料更容易青贮成功。由此可见,在马铃薯茎叶中添加15%米糠和4%小麦麸即可获得良好的青贮品质。
本試驗旨在研究添加米糠和小麥麩對2箇品種的馬鈴藷莖葉青貯品質的影響。採用2×6雙因子設計,2箇因子分彆為馬鈴藷品種( A)和馬鈴藷莖葉與米糠、小麥麩的混閤比例( B),其中馬鈴藷品種為莊藷3號( A1)和青藷169號( A2);各混閤比例為馬鈴藷莖葉單獨青貯( B1)、85%馬鈴藷莖葉+15%米糠( B2)、81%馬鈴藷莖葉+15%米糠+4%小麥麩( B3)、77%馬鈴藷莖葉+15%米糠+8%小麥麩( B4)、73%馬鈴藷莖葉+15%米糠+12%小麥麩( B5)、69%馬鈴藷莖葉+15%米糠+16%小麥麩( B6)。共12箇處理,每箇處理4箇重複。用600 mL玻璃瓶作青貯瓶。室溫保存45 d。結果錶明,與A1青貯飼料相比,A2青貯飼料有較高的感官評分及榦物質、中性洗滌纖維含量(P<0.05),較低的pH及氨態氮、乳痠、丁痠、粗蛋白質含量(P<0.05)。與B1青貯飼料相比,B2青貯飼料有較低的pH及乙痠、丁痠、氨態氮、粗蛋白質含量和較高的乳痠、榦物質、中性洗滌纖維含量及感官評分、乳痠/乙痠( P<0.05)。與B2青貯飼料相比,B3青貯飼料進一步降低瞭青貯飼料的pH及氨態氮、乙痠含量(P<0.05),提高瞭感官評分、乳痠/乙痠及乳痠、榦物質、粗蛋白質、中性洗滌纖維含量。 B4、B5、B6青貯飼料又比B3青貯飼料有較低的氨態氮和丁痠含量(P<0.05),較高的榦物質和粗蛋白質含量(P<0.05)。在感官評分、乳痠/乙痠及氨態氮、乳痠、丁痠、榦物質含量和上,A、B兩因子間存在互作( P<0.05)。對于相同比例的米糠和小麥麩,A2青貯飼料比A1青貯飼料更容易青貯成功。由此可見,在馬鈴藷莖葉中添加15%米糠和4%小麥麩即可穫得良好的青貯品質。
본시험지재연구첨가미강화소맥부대2개품충적마령서경협청저품질적영향。채용2×6쌍인자설계,2개인자분별위마령서품충( A)화마령서경협여미강、소맥부적혼합비례( B),기중마령서품충위장서3호( A1)화청서169호( A2);각혼합비례위마령서경협단독청저( B1)、85%마령서경협+15%미강( B2)、81%마령서경협+15%미강+4%소맥부( B3)、77%마령서경협+15%미강+8%소맥부( B4)、73%마령서경협+15%미강+12%소맥부( B5)、69%마령서경협+15%미강+16%소맥부( B6)。공12개처리,매개처리4개중복。용600 mL파리병작청저병。실온보존45 d。결과표명,여A1청저사료상비,A2청저사료유교고적감관평분급간물질、중성세조섬유함량(P<0.05),교저적pH급안태담、유산、정산、조단백질함량(P<0.05)。여B1청저사료상비,B2청저사료유교저적pH급을산、정산、안태담、조단백질함량화교고적유산、간물질、중성세조섬유함량급감관평분、유산/을산( P<0.05)。여B2청저사료상비,B3청저사료진일보강저료청저사료적pH급안태담、을산함량(P<0.05),제고료감관평분、유산/을산급유산、간물질、조단백질、중성세조섬유함량。 B4、B5、B6청저사료우비B3청저사료유교저적안태담화정산함량(P<0.05),교고적간물질화조단백질함량(P<0.05)。재감관평분、유산/을산급안태담、유산、정산、간물질함량화상,A、B량인자간존재호작( P<0.05)。대우상동비례적미강화소맥부,A2청저사료비A1청저사료경용역청저성공。유차가견,재마령서경협중첨가15%미강화4%소맥부즉가획득량호적청저품질。
This experiment was conducted to investigate the effects of adding wheat bran and rice bran on silage quality of 2 cultivars of potato vines. A 2×6 two factors experimental design was used. Potato vines (A) were from two potato cultivars: Zhuangshu 3 ( A1) and Qingshu 169 ( A2) . And six mixing ratios ( B) of wheat bran and rice bran were potato vines alone, ( B1 ) , 85% potato vines+15% rice bran ( B2 ) , 81% potato vines+15% rice bran+4% wheat bran ( B3) , 77% potato vines+15% rice bran+8% wheat bran ( B4) , 73%potato vines+15% rice bran+12% wheat bran ( B5 ) , 69% potato vines+15% rice bran+16% wheat bran ( B6) . There were 12 treatments with each treatment 4 replicates. Silages were prepared by using glass bottles ( 600 mL) in laboratory. The silos were kept at room temperature for 45 days. The results showed that A2 si-lage had higher sensory scoring and content of dry matter and neutral detergent fiber than A1 silage, and had lower pH and content of ammonia nitrogen, lactic acid, butyric acid and crude protein than A1 silage ( P<0.05) . Compared with B1 silage, B2 silage decreased pH and content of acetic acid, butyric acid, ammonia nitrogen and crude protein ( P<0.05) , increased sensory scoring, lactic/acetic acid and content of lactic acid, dry matter and neutral detergent fiber ( P<0.05) . Compared with B2 silage, B3 silage decreased pH and con-tent of ammonia nitrogen and acetic acid ( P<0.05) , increased sensory scoring, lactic/acetic acid and content of lactic acid, dry matter, crude protein and neutral detergent fiber ( P<0.05) . B4, B5, B6 silages had lower content of ammonia nitrogen and butyric acid and higher content of dry matter and crude protein than B3 silage ( P<0.05) . There were interactions between cultivar and mixing ratio on sensory scoring, lactic/acetic acid and content of ammonia nitrogen, lactic acid, butyric acid and dry matter ( P<0.05) . For the same mixing ratio, A2 silage had a better silage quality than A1 silage. It is concluded that potato vines can get good quality silages when mixing with 15% rice bran and 4% wheat bran.