情报杂志
情報雜誌
정보잡지
Journal of Intelligence
2015年
9期
97-101
,共5页
科研人员%在线学术社交%科学网
科研人員%在線學術社交%科學網
과연인원%재선학술사교%과학망
researchers%online academic social networking%ScienceNet
为了揭示我国科研人员在线学术社交模式及科研活动特征,选取在我国具有代表性的科研社区平台———科学网,采用数据挖掘方法,从多学科比较视角开展实证研究。研究结果显示:学科间存在较大的在线学术社交差异,管理相关学科用户更具有强烈的在线学术社交倾向,而工程材料领域用户则表现较弱,信息学科用户在学术社交网络中具有较强影响力,处于在线学术社交网络的中心地位。
為瞭揭示我國科研人員在線學術社交模式及科研活動特徵,選取在我國具有代錶性的科研社區平檯———科學網,採用數據挖掘方法,從多學科比較視角開展實證研究。研究結果顯示:學科間存在較大的在線學術社交差異,管理相關學科用戶更具有彊烈的在線學術社交傾嚮,而工程材料領域用戶則錶現較弱,信息學科用戶在學術社交網絡中具有較彊影響力,處于在線學術社交網絡的中心地位。
위료게시아국과연인원재선학술사교모식급과연활동특정,선취재아국구유대표성적과연사구평태———과학망,채용수거알굴방법,종다학과비교시각개전실증연구。연구결과현시:학과간존재교대적재선학술사교차이,관리상관학과용호경구유강렬적재선학술사교경향,이공정재료영역용호칙표현교약,신식학과용호재학술사교망락중구유교강영향력,처우재선학술사교망락적중심지위。
Aiming to discover the online social networking pattern among researchers in China, an empirical research was conducted based on a multidisciplinary comparison, with ScienceNet, a representative online academic community in China, being chosen as sample sources and then analyzed by the method of data mining. Empirical result showed that significant differences concerning with online aca-demic social networking existed among different academic disciplines. More specifically, researchers related with management disciplines would more tend to building online social networking for academic affairs than the ones of other disciplines, and conversely researchers of engineering materials discipline would resort much less to academic social networking. Moreover, researchers of information science disci-pline would show a powerful influence in the online academic social network and gain a center position in the network.