北京林业大学学报（社会科学版）
北京林業大學學報（社會科學版）
북경임업대학학보（사회과학판）
Journal of Beijing Forestry University (Social Sciences)
2015年
3期
53-58
,共6页
中美贸易%隐含碳%投入产出法%木质林产品
中美貿易%隱含碳%投入產齣法%木質林產品
중미무역%은함탄%투입산출법%목질림산품
Sino-US trade%embodied carbon%input-output method%woody forest product
在世界环境问题日益严峻的情况下，低碳经济的观念逐渐深入人心，随着中美木质林产品贸易规模的不断扩大，木质林产品的碳排放问题逐渐受到各国的关注。分析了中美两国木质林产品的贸易现状，从隐含碳的角度，运用投入产出法估算出近10年来中美两国木质林产品贸易中的隐含碳排放量，并运用对数平均迪氏指数法对木质林产品贸易碳排放的影响因素进行分析。经对比发现，中美木质林产品贸易存在的隐含碳排放主要是由于贸易结构不合理、生产技术不先进、减排力度不均衡、缺乏国际合作等问题导致。提出了调整进出口结构、积极推进节能减排发展、加强国际合作等政策建议。
在世界環境問題日益嚴峻的情況下，低碳經濟的觀唸逐漸深入人心，隨著中美木質林產品貿易規模的不斷擴大，木質林產品的碳排放問題逐漸受到各國的關註。分析瞭中美兩國木質林產品的貿易現狀，從隱含碳的角度，運用投入產齣法估算齣近10年來中美兩國木質林產品貿易中的隱含碳排放量，併運用對數平均迪氏指數法對木質林產品貿易碳排放的影響因素進行分析。經對比髮現，中美木質林產品貿易存在的隱含碳排放主要是由于貿易結構不閤理、生產技術不先進、減排力度不均衡、缺乏國際閤作等問題導緻。提齣瞭調整進齣口結構、積極推進節能減排髮展、加彊國際閤作等政策建議。
재세계배경문제일익엄준적정황하，저탄경제적관념축점심입인심，수착중미목질림산품무역규모적불단확대，목질림산품적탄배방문제축점수도각국적관주。분석료중미량국목질림산품적무역현상，종은함탄적각도，운용투입산출법고산출근10년래중미량국목질림산품무역중적은함탄배방량，병운용대수평균적씨지수법대목질림산품무역탄배방적영향인소진행분석。경대비발현，중미목질림산품무역존재적은함탄배방주요시유우무역결구불합리、생산기술불선진、감배력도불균형、결핍국제합작등문제도치。제출료조정진출구결구、적겁추진절능감배발전、가강국제합작등정책건의。
As the environmental problems in the world become more and more serious, the concept of low-carbon economy has been rooted deeply in people' s minds. With the constant expanding of the Sino-US trade of woody forest products, the issue of carbon emission has caught attention in both countries. In this paper, we analyze the current trade situation of woody forest products in both China and USA. Then from the perspective of embodied carbon, we estimate the embodied carbon emission of recent 10 years in the trade of woody forest products between two countries using input-output method, and analyze the factors affecting the carbon emission in the trade of woody forest products using the method of Logarithmic Mean Divisia Index ( LMDI ) to analyze the factors. After comparison, we find that the emission of embodied carbon in the Sino-US trade of woody forest products mainly results from the problems such as the unreasonable trade structure, inferior production technologies, unbalanced intensity of emission reduction, and the lack of international cooperation. Accordingly we give policy suggestions of adjusting trade structure, actively promoting energy conservation and emission reduction, and strengthening international cooperation.
