按摩与康复医学
按摩與康複醫學
안마여강복의학
Chinese Manipulation & Rehabilitation Medicine
2015年
20期
29-30
,共2页
腹外疝%无张力修补术%传统疝修补术%临床指标%VAS评分%并发症
腹外疝%無張力脩補術%傳統疝脩補術%臨床指標%VAS評分%併髮癥
복외산%무장력수보술%전통산수보술%림상지표%VAS평분%병발증
abdominal external hernia%tension-free repair%traditional herniorrhaphy%clinical index%VAS score%complication
目的：比较无张力修补术与传统疝修补术治疗腹外疝患者的临床疗效。方法：80例腹外疝患者随机分为实验组与对照组各40例，对照组采取传统疝修复术，实验组采取无张力修补术，比较两组患者的相关临床指标、术后VAS评分与并发症情况。结果：实验组出血量、手术时间、恢复时间、住院时间与术后VAS评分均显著少于对照组（P<0.01）；实验组切口疼痛、术后感染、阴囊水肿、肿胀与鞘膜积液均显著少于对照组（P<0.05）。结论：无张力修补术治疗腹外疝临床效果显著，具有借鉴性。
目的：比較無張力脩補術與傳統疝脩補術治療腹外疝患者的臨床療效。方法：80例腹外疝患者隨機分為實驗組與對照組各40例，對照組採取傳統疝脩複術，實驗組採取無張力脩補術，比較兩組患者的相關臨床指標、術後VAS評分與併髮癥情況。結果：實驗組齣血量、手術時間、恢複時間、住院時間與術後VAS評分均顯著少于對照組（P<0.01）；實驗組切口疼痛、術後感染、陰囊水腫、腫脹與鞘膜積液均顯著少于對照組（P<0.05）。結論：無張力脩補術治療腹外疝臨床效果顯著，具有藉鑒性。
목적：비교무장력수보술여전통산수보술치료복외산환자적림상료효。방법：80례복외산환자수궤분위실험조여대조조각40례，대조조채취전통산수복술，실험조채취무장력수보술，비교량조환자적상관림상지표、술후VAS평분여병발증정황。결과：실험조출혈량、수술시간、회복시간、주원시간여술후VAS평분균현저소우대조조（P<0.01）；실험조절구동통、술후감염、음낭수종、종창여초막적액균현저소우대조조（P<0.05）。결론：무장력수보술치료복외산림상효과현저，구유차감성。
Objective:To compare the clinical effect of tension-free repair and traditional herniorrhaphy treating abdominal external hernia. Methods:80 cases of abdominal external hernia were randomly divided into experimental group and control group with each of 40 cases, control group treated with traditional herniorrhaphy, experimental group adopted tension-free repair, the correlated clinical indexes, VAS scores and complications were compared between the two groups. Results:The bleeding amount, operation time, recovery time, hospitalization time and postoperative VAS scores of experimental group were all significantly less than those in control group (P<0.01);incision pain, postoperative infection, scrotal edema, swelling and hydrocele of tunica vaginalis of experimental group were all significantly less than those in control group (P<0.05). Conclusion:The clinical ef-fect of tension-free repair treating abdominal external hernia is remarkable with reference.
