电子与信息学报
電子與信息學報
전자여신식학보
Journal of Electronics & Information Technology
2015年
10期
2529-2535
,共7页
测试数据压缩%EFDR(Extended Frequency-Directed Run-length)编码%自适应EFDR编码%解码
測試數據壓縮%EFDR(Extended Frequency-Directed Run-length)編碼%自適應EFDR編碼%解碼
측시수거압축%EFDR(Extended Frequency-Directed Run-length)편마%자괄응EFDR편마%해마
Test data compression%Extended Frequency-Directed Run-length (EFDR) code%Adaptive EFDR code%decode
该文提出一种用于测试数据压缩的自适应EFDR(Extended Frequency-Directed Run-length)编码方法。该方法以EFDR编码为基础,增加了一个用于表示后缀与前缀编码长度差值的参数N,对测试集中的每个测试向量,根据其游程分布情况,选择最合适的 N 值进行编码,提高了编码效率。在解码方面,编码后的码字经过简单的数学运算即可恢复得到原测试数据的游程长度,且不同 N 值下的编码码字均可使用相同的解码电路来解码,因此解码电路具有较小的硬件开销。对ISCAS-89部分标准电路的实验结果表明,该方法的平均压缩率达到69.87%,较原EFDR编码方法提高了4.07%。
該文提齣一種用于測試數據壓縮的自適應EFDR(Extended Frequency-Directed Run-length)編碼方法。該方法以EFDR編碼為基礎,增加瞭一箇用于錶示後綴與前綴編碼長度差值的參數N,對測試集中的每箇測試嚮量,根據其遊程分佈情況,選擇最閤適的 N 值進行編碼,提高瞭編碼效率。在解碼方麵,編碼後的碼字經過簡單的數學運算即可恢複得到原測試數據的遊程長度,且不同 N 值下的編碼碼字均可使用相同的解碼電路來解碼,因此解碼電路具有較小的硬件開銷。對ISCAS-89部分標準電路的實驗結果錶明,該方法的平均壓縮率達到69.87%,較原EFDR編碼方法提高瞭4.07%。
해문제출일충용우측시수거압축적자괄응EFDR(Extended Frequency-Directed Run-length)편마방법。해방법이EFDR편마위기출,증가료일개용우표시후철여전철편마장도차치적삼수N,대측시집중적매개측시향량,근거기유정분포정황,선택최합괄적 N 치진행편마,제고료편마효솔。재해마방면,편마후적마자경과간단적수학운산즉가회복득도원측시수거적유정장도,차불동 N 치하적편마마자균가사용상동적해마전로래해마,인차해마전로구유교소적경건개소。대ISCAS-89부분표준전로적실험결과표명,해방법적평균압축솔체도69.87%,교원EFDR편마방법제고료4.07%。
An adaptive Extended Frequency-Directed Run-length (EFDR) code method for test data compression is presented in this paper. The method is based on EFDR code, and adds an additional parameterN, which is used to represent the code length difference between tail and prefix. According to the distribution of the runs in each test vector of the test set, the method selects the most suitableN values to code, and it can improve the compression ratio. For the decompression, according to the size of the codeword, the run length of the original test data can be obtained with a simple mathematical operation. Meanwhile, those codeword under different parameter values can be decoded by the same decompression circuit. Thus, the decompression circuit can keep in a low hardware cost level. The experimental result shows that the average compression rate of the proposed method can achieve to 69.87%, over 4.07% than original EFDR code method.