CAJ | 학술논문

对比分析了布氏硬度试验国标 GB/T 231与美标 ASTM E10的差异,发现 GB/T 231与 ASTM E10对试验方法的规定基本相同,对试验力、试验力保持时间、最小试样厚度等技术指标要求不同；对检验周期、直接检验、间接检验的要求,两者差异较大,GB/T 231要求更为严苛、量化、具体,ASTM E10要求更为详尽、宽泛。最后,结合标准差异分析,对布氏硬度测试在石油装备行业应用过程中的常见问题进行了归纳总结。
대비분석료포씨경도시험국표 GB/T 231여미표 ASTM E10적차이,발현 GB/T 231여 ASTM E10대시험방법적규정기본상동,대시험력、시험력보지시간、최소시양후도등기술지표요구불동；대검험주기、직접검험、간접검험적요구,량자차이교대,GB/T 231요구경위엄가、양화、구체,ASTM E10요구경위상진、관범。최후,결합표준차이분석,대포씨경도측시재석유장비행업응용과정중적상견문제진행료귀납총결。
The difference between Brinell hardness test standards of GB/T 231 and ASTM E10 were compared and analyzed,and it was found that the regulations about test method in GB/T 231 and ASTM E 10 are basically the same,except the technical indicators about test force,dwell time and minimum sample thickness.The requirements of verification schedule,direct verification and indirect verification are obviously different in the two standards,and GB/T 231 is strict,quantitative and specific and ASTM E10 is detailed and tolerant.In the end, according to the difference analysis between the two standards,the common problems of Brinell hardness test in oil equipment industry field were summarized and concluded.