牙体牙髓牙周病学杂志
牙體牙髓牙週病學雜誌
아체아수아주병학잡지
Chinese Journal of Conservative Dentistry
2015年
9期
554-557
,共4页
章立群%刘学%肖莉%黄佩珍
章立群%劉學%肖莉%黃珮珍
장립군%류학%초리%황패진
微创手术%牙周翻瓣手术%口腔显微镜%超声骨刀
微創手術%牙週翻瓣手術%口腔顯微鏡%超聲骨刀
미창수술%아주번판수술%구강현미경%초성골도
microsurgery%periodontal flap surgery%dental microscope%piezosurgery device
目的:评价微创技术在牙周翻瓣术中的效果. 方法:选择需进行牙周翻瓣术( PFS)的患者35例,采用自身对照法,随机将患者口内一侧上、下2个区作为实验组,用微创法进行PFS,另一侧上、下2个区为对照组,用传统方式进行PFS. 比较术后1、3、7 d疼痛度、肿胀度及3、6、12个月菌斑指数、牙周袋深度、牙周附着丧失等牙周指标. 结果:实验组疼痛度治疗后1、3、7 d均显著低于对照组(P<0. 05),肿胀度第1、3天亦显著低于对照组(P<0. 05);实验组和对照组第3、6个月各牙周指标相比无统计学差异(P>0. 05),第12个月两组各项指标均有统计学差异(P<0. 05). 结论:微创牙周翻瓣手术比传统手术法更有优势.
目的:評價微創技術在牙週翻瓣術中的效果. 方法:選擇需進行牙週翻瓣術( PFS)的患者35例,採用自身對照法,隨機將患者口內一側上、下2箇區作為實驗組,用微創法進行PFS,另一側上、下2箇區為對照組,用傳統方式進行PFS. 比較術後1、3、7 d疼痛度、腫脹度及3、6、12箇月菌斑指數、牙週袋深度、牙週附著喪失等牙週指標. 結果:實驗組疼痛度治療後1、3、7 d均顯著低于對照組(P<0. 05),腫脹度第1、3天亦顯著低于對照組(P<0. 05);實驗組和對照組第3、6箇月各牙週指標相比無統計學差異(P>0. 05),第12箇月兩組各項指標均有統計學差異(P<0. 05). 結論:微創牙週翻瓣手術比傳統手術法更有優勢.
목적:평개미창기술재아주번판술중적효과. 방법:선택수진행아주번판술( PFS)적환자35례,채용자신대조법,수궤장환자구내일측상、하2개구작위실험조,용미창법진행PFS,령일측상、하2개구위대조조,용전통방식진행PFS. 비교술후1、3、7 d동통도、종창도급3、6、12개월균반지수、아주대심도、아주부착상실등아주지표. 결과:실험조동통도치료후1、3、7 d균현저저우대조조(P<0. 05),종창도제1、3천역현저저우대조조(P<0. 05);실험조화대조조제3、6개월각아주지표상비무통계학차이(P>0. 05),제12개월량조각항지표균유통계학차이(P<0. 05). 결론:미창아주번판수술비전통수술법경유우세.
AIM:To investigate the clinical effects of minimal invasive technique in periodontal flap surgery. METHODS:35 patients with moderate or severe chronic periodontal disease were included and underwent periodontal surgery . In each patient, one side was randomly assigned to periodontal micro flap surgery ( test group) , the contra-lateral side was assigned to conventional surgery ( control group) . Visual analog scale ( VAS) of pain, degree of swell-ing (DS) and clinical indicators of plaque index (PLI), probing depth (PD), clinical attachment loss (CAL) and sulcus bleeding index (SBI) were assessed 1, 3 and 7 days and 1 , 3 and 6 months after surgery. RESULTS:VAS of test group was lower than that of control group 1, 3 and 7 days after surgery (P<0. 05). DS of test group was lower than that of control group 1 and 3 days after surgery(P<0. 05). All clinical indicators of test group were lower than those of control group 3 and 6 months after poeration but had no statistical difference (P>0. 05). At the end of 12 month after surgery, all parameters in test group were lower than those in control group (P<0. 05). CONCLUSION: Periodontal micro flap surgery has advantage over conventional periodontal flap surgery.