中华口腔医学杂志
中華口腔醫學雜誌
중화구강의학잡지
Chinese Journal of Stomatology
2015年
10期
598-602
,共5页
刘璐玮%马莲%林久祥%贾绮林
劉璐瑋%馬蓮%林久祥%賈綺林
류로위%마련%림구상%가기림
唇裂%腭裂%牙槽突%骨移植
脣裂%腭裂%牙槽突%骨移植
진렬%악렬%아조돌%골이식
Cleft lip%Cleft palate%Alveolar process%Bone transplantation
目的 提出评价牙槽突裂植骨疗效的三维分级标准,完善Bergland评价系统.方法 本研究选择于2014年1至4月在北京大学口腔医学院·口腔医院就诊的单侧完全性唇腭裂患者40例,均在二期牙槽突裂植骨术后3个月拍摄植骨区牙槽突局部锥形束CT片,提出牙槽突高度分级(H-Ⅰ~H-Ⅳ级)、厚度分级(T-Ⅰ ~T-Ⅳ级)、牙槽突综合分级(H+T)及临床成功标准(高度和厚度总分级均为Ⅰ或Ⅱ级时,属于临床成功型).结果 33侧植骨区牙槽突高度为临床成功型(18侧H-Ⅰ级和15侧H-Ⅱ级),牙槽突厚度属于临床成功型(总分级为T-Ⅰ级或T-Ⅱ级)共有25侧.结论 牙槽突裂植骨疗效的三维评价方法能够更全面地评价牙槽突植骨的真实情况,尤其是牙槽突厚度.
目的 提齣評價牙槽突裂植骨療效的三維分級標準,完善Bergland評價繫統.方法 本研究選擇于2014年1至4月在北京大學口腔醫學院·口腔醫院就診的單側完全性脣腭裂患者40例,均在二期牙槽突裂植骨術後3箇月拍攝植骨區牙槽突跼部錐形束CT片,提齣牙槽突高度分級(H-Ⅰ~H-Ⅳ級)、厚度分級(T-Ⅰ ~T-Ⅳ級)、牙槽突綜閤分級(H+T)及臨床成功標準(高度和厚度總分級均為Ⅰ或Ⅱ級時,屬于臨床成功型).結果 33側植骨區牙槽突高度為臨床成功型(18側H-Ⅰ級和15側H-Ⅱ級),牙槽突厚度屬于臨床成功型(總分級為T-Ⅰ級或T-Ⅱ級)共有25側.結論 牙槽突裂植骨療效的三維評價方法能夠更全麵地評價牙槽突植骨的真實情況,尤其是牙槽突厚度.
목적 제출평개아조돌렬식골료효적삼유분급표준,완선Bergland평개계통.방법 본연구선택우2014년1지4월재북경대학구강의학원·구강의원취진적단측완전성진악렬환자40례,균재이기아조돌렬식골술후3개월박섭식골구아조돌국부추형속CT편,제출아조돌고도분급(H-Ⅰ~H-Ⅳ급)、후도분급(T-Ⅰ ~T-Ⅳ급)、아조돌종합분급(H+T)급림상성공표준(고도화후도총분급균위Ⅰ혹Ⅱ급시,속우림상성공형).결과 33측식골구아조돌고도위림상성공형(18측H-Ⅰ급화15측H-Ⅱ급),아조돌후도속우림상성공형(총분급위T-Ⅰ급혹T-Ⅱ급)공유25측.결론 아조돌렬식골료효적삼유평개방법능구경전면지평개아조돌식골적진실정황,우기시아조돌후도.
Objective To propose a new three-dimensional method or grading scale in the evaluation of the secondary alveolar bone grafting,thus modifying the Bergland grading scale.Methods A total of 40 patients (26 male,14 female) with unilateral cleft lip and palate (UCLP),who underwent secondary alveolar bone grafting at least 3 months ago,were enrolled.Regional cone-beam CT(CBCT) scans were taken to evaluate the height and thickness of the postoperative bone bridges.A new three-dimensional grafting scale was established,including four grades respectively in alveolar height and thickness.Results According to the new three-dimensional scale in this study,15 grafted sites were rated grade T-Ⅰ or T-Ⅱ in the alveolar thickness among 18 sites of grade H-Ⅰ in height,and 10 among 15 of grade H-Ⅱ in height.Therefore,25 grafted sites were considered as clinical success in the alveolar thickness (grade T-Ⅰ or T-Ⅱ) among 33 sites with clinical success in alveolar height (grade H-Ⅰ and H-Ⅱ).There were 24% of 33 sites with clinical success in height,which were considered as clinical failure in the alveolar thickness.Conclusions It is necessary to establish a new three-dimensional method or grading scale for evaluating the secondary alveolar bone grafting.The three-dimensional scale can take comprehensive view of the bone-grafted alveolar clefts and thus modify the Bergland grading scale.