中国卫生标准管理
中國衛生標準管理
중국위생표준관리
China Health Standard Management
2015年
26期
251-252
,共2页
颅脑损伤%急诊护理路径%护理质量
顱腦損傷%急診護理路徑%護理質量
로뇌손상%급진호리로경%호리질량
Brain injury%Emergency care path%Quality of care
目的：分析采用急诊护理路径在颅脑损伤急救中的实用价值。方法选取我院符合研究的2014年3月～2015年3月期间收治的60例脑损伤患者，按数字随机法分为两组，对照组30例采用常规护理，研究组患者30例采用临床护理路径。干预后对比两组的护理质量满意度、抢救时间、LES评分等指标。结果干预后对照组护理质量评分、LES评分均明显低于研究组，差异有统计学意义（P＜0.05）；研究组抢救时间为（31.89±6.14）h，明显低于对照组抢救时间（46.56±7.02）h，差异有统计学意义（P＜0.05）；结论在颅脑损伤急救中实施急诊护理干预能显著缩短手术时间，提高患者的生活质量和预后效果。
目的：分析採用急診護理路徑在顱腦損傷急救中的實用價值。方法選取我院符閤研究的2014年3月～2015年3月期間收治的60例腦損傷患者，按數字隨機法分為兩組，對照組30例採用常規護理，研究組患者30例採用臨床護理路徑。榦預後對比兩組的護理質量滿意度、搶救時間、LES評分等指標。結果榦預後對照組護理質量評分、LES評分均明顯低于研究組，差異有統計學意義（P＜0.05）；研究組搶救時間為（31.89±6.14）h，明顯低于對照組搶救時間（46.56±7.02）h，差異有統計學意義（P＜0.05）；結論在顱腦損傷急救中實施急診護理榦預能顯著縮短手術時間，提高患者的生活質量和預後效果。
목적：분석채용급진호리로경재로뇌손상급구중적실용개치。방법선취아원부합연구적2014년3월～2015년3월기간수치적60례뇌손상환자，안수자수궤법분위량조，대조조30례채용상규호리，연구조환자30례채용림상호리로경。간예후대비량조적호리질량만의도、창구시간、LES평분등지표。결과간예후대조조호리질량평분、LES평분균명현저우연구조，차이유통계학의의（P＜0.05）；연구조창구시간위（31.89±6.14）h，명현저우대조조창구시간（46.56±7.02）h，차이유통계학의의（P＜0.05）；결론재로뇌손상급구중실시급진호리간예능현저축단수술시간，제고환자적생활질량화예후효과。
Objective To study the use of emergency care path practical value in traumatic brain injury first aid.Methods 60 cases of brain injury patients from March 2014 to March 2015 in our hospital were randomly divided into two groups. 30 cases in each group. The control group was received conventional care, the treatment group was received clinical nursing path. Compared two groups of nursing quality satisfaction, rescue time, LES scores and other indicators after nursing intervention.ResultsThe treatment group was better than the control group, there was statistical significance(P<0.05); the rescue time in the treatment group was (31.89±6.14)h, significantly lower than the rescue time (46.56±7.02)h in the control group, the difference was statisticaly significant (P<0.05);Conclusion The implementation of emergency nursing interventions in emergency brain injury can significantly shorten the operation time, improve the quality of life and prognosis of patients.
