船舶
船舶
선박
Ship & Boat
2015年
z1期
120-124
,共5页
石义静%赵仲秋%周忠辉%姜旭
石義靜%趙仲鞦%週忠輝%薑旭
석의정%조중추%주충휘%강욱
协调版共同结构规范%散货船%有限元%规范计算
協調版共同結構規範%散貨船%有限元%規範計算
협조판공동결구규범%산화선%유한원%규범계산
harmonised common structural rule(CSR-H)%bulk carrier%ifnite element%rule calculation
根据IACS2014年1月推出的CSR-H,对目前CSDC设计的18万吨散货船进行符合CSR-H设计。分别运用美国船级社的CA Stage 1程序和CSR-H Bulk Check Stage 2程序进行规范计算和有限元计算,给出满足CSR-H要求的货舱区结构重量对于CSR规范的增加量。主要内容如下:一、比较CSR-H与CSR对散货船要求的差异,分析CSR-H对散货船设计的影响。二、对货舱区各个横剖面进行规范计算,研究CSR-H对板材和型材尺寸的新要求,分析各结构部位与满足CSR船型结构存在差异的原因。三、应用直接计算法对全船货舱区进行屈服和屈曲强度评估,比较基于CSR-H要求的计算结果与CSR要求结构尺寸存在的差异。
根據IACS2014年1月推齣的CSR-H,對目前CSDC設計的18萬噸散貨船進行符閤CSR-H設計。分彆運用美國船級社的CA Stage 1程序和CSR-H Bulk Check Stage 2程序進行規範計算和有限元計算,給齣滿足CSR-H要求的貨艙區結構重量對于CSR規範的增加量。主要內容如下:一、比較CSR-H與CSR對散貨船要求的差異,分析CSR-H對散貨船設計的影響。二、對貨艙區各箇橫剖麵進行規範計算,研究CSR-H對闆材和型材呎吋的新要求,分析各結構部位與滿足CSR船型結構存在差異的原因。三、應用直接計算法對全船貨艙區進行屈服和屈麯彊度評估,比較基于CSR-H要求的計算結果與CSR要求結構呎吋存在的差異。
근거IACS2014년1월추출적CSR-H,대목전CSDC설계적18만둔산화선진행부합CSR-H설계。분별운용미국선급사적CA Stage 1정서화CSR-H Bulk Check Stage 2정서진행규범계산화유한원계산,급출만족CSR-H요구적화창구결구중량대우CSR규범적증가량。주요내용여하:일、비교CSR-H여CSR대산화선요구적차이,분석CSR-H대산화선설계적영향。이、대화창구각개횡부면진행규범계산,연구CSR-H대판재화형재척촌적신요구,분석각결구부위여만족CSR선형결구존재차이적원인。삼、응용직접계산법대전선화창구진행굴복화굴곡강도평고,비교기우CSR-H요구적계산결과여CSR요구결구척촌존재적차이。
The current 180 000 t bulk carrier designed by CSDC is redesigned according to the harmonised common structural rules (CSR-H), which has been proposed by IACS in January, 2014. The increment of structural weight in cargo hold region that meets the requirements of CSR-H is calculated by CA stage 1 and CSR-H Bulk Check stage 2 programs of American Bureau of Shipping (ABS), as well as the ifnite element analysis. Firstly, it compares the requirements of bulk carriers in CSR-H with those in common structural rules (CSR), and analyzes the impact effect of the new requirements in CSR-H on the design of bulk carriers. Secondly, it studies the new requirements of the grillage and scantlings in CSR-H from the rule calculations of each transverse section in the cargo hold region, and analyzes the reason that each structure differs from the structure following with CSR. Lastly, it evaluates the yielding strength and the buckling strength of all cargo hold region by the direct calculation, and compares the scantlings calculated by the requirements of CSR-H with those calculated by the requirements of CSR.