西安电子科技大学学报(社会科学版)
西安電子科技大學學報(社會科學版)
서안전자과기대학학보(사회과학판)
Journal of Xidian University (Social Sciences Edition)
2015年
4期
16-23
,共8页
对外直接投资%技术能力%制度%政府有效性%经济自由度%折衷范式
對外直接投資%技術能力%製度%政府有效性%經濟自由度%摺衷範式
대외직접투자%기술능력%제도%정부유효성%경제자유도%절충범식
OFDI%technology capability%institution%infrastructure%governance effectiveness%economic freedom%eclectic paradigm
本文基于二手数据研究中国和日本的公司对东亚和东南亚的投资行为如何受其母国技术能力、东道国的基础设施和制度的影响,并进一步探究东道国基础设施和制度的调节作用。本文选取中国和日本对东亚、东南亚九个主要的国家和地区十年间的180个(中国和日本各90个)直接投资的样本数据进行研究分析,得出结论:(1)对于中国来说,技术能力、东道主基础设施建设和制度对母国对外直接投资有很大影响。东道国基础设施建设质量越高、经济自由程度越高、治理越有效、中国跨国公司技术能力越高,中国的对外直接投资就越高;并且当东道国基础设施建设质量越高、经济自由度越高、治理越有效的条件下时,母国技术能力对其对外直接投资的正向影响就越强。(2)对于日本来说,技术能力对母国对外直接投资有负向影响。母国技术能力越强,日本对外直接投资就越少,并且当东道国基础设施建设较好时,这种负向作用表现得更为明显。这表明日本作为一个发达国家,更倾向于专利保护,而非技术输出,当东道国的基础设施较好时,这种专利保护的倾向更为强烈。
本文基于二手數據研究中國和日本的公司對東亞和東南亞的投資行為如何受其母國技術能力、東道國的基礎設施和製度的影響,併進一步探究東道國基礎設施和製度的調節作用。本文選取中國和日本對東亞、東南亞九箇主要的國傢和地區十年間的180箇(中國和日本各90箇)直接投資的樣本數據進行研究分析,得齣結論:(1)對于中國來說,技術能力、東道主基礎設施建設和製度對母國對外直接投資有很大影響。東道國基礎設施建設質量越高、經濟自由程度越高、治理越有效、中國跨國公司技術能力越高,中國的對外直接投資就越高;併且噹東道國基礎設施建設質量越高、經濟自由度越高、治理越有效的條件下時,母國技術能力對其對外直接投資的正嚮影響就越彊。(2)對于日本來說,技術能力對母國對外直接投資有負嚮影響。母國技術能力越彊,日本對外直接投資就越少,併且噹東道國基礎設施建設較好時,這種負嚮作用錶現得更為明顯。這錶明日本作為一箇髮達國傢,更傾嚮于專利保護,而非技術輸齣,噹東道國的基礎設施較好時,這種專利保護的傾嚮更為彊烈。
본문기우이수수거연구중국화일본적공사대동아화동남아적투자행위여하수기모국기술능력、동도국적기출설시화제도적영향,병진일보탐구동도국기출설시화제도적조절작용。본문선취중국화일본대동아、동남아구개주요적국가화지구십년간적180개(중국화일본각90개)직접투자적양본수거진행연구분석,득출결론:(1)대우중국래설,기술능력、동도주기출설시건설화제도대모국대외직접투자유흔대영향。동도국기출설시건설질량월고、경제자유정도월고、치리월유효、중국과국공사기술능력월고,중국적대외직접투자취월고;병차당동도국기출설시건설질량월고、경제자유도월고、치리월유효적조건하시,모국기술능력대기대외직접투자적정향영향취월강。(2)대우일본래설,기술능력대모국대외직접투자유부향영향。모국기술능력월강,일본대외직접투자취월소,병차당동도국기출설시건설교호시,저충부향작용표현득경위명현。저표명일본작위일개발체국가,경경향우전리보호,이비기술수출,당동도국적기출설시교호시,저충전리보호적경향경위강렬。
This article is focused on how investments of Chinese and Japanese companies to east and south east Asia are influenced by technology of their home countries and infrastructures and institutions of host countries. Furthermore, we consider about the moderating role of infrastructures and institutions. The data comes from 180 investment cases in nine East and Southeast Asian countries, 90 of which are carried out by Chinese companies and the rest are implemented by Japanese countries. In sum, we draw following conclusions: (1) In terms of China, technology of home country, infrastructures and institutions of host countries all paly important roles in OFDI( Outward Foreign Direct Investment). Better infrastructure, higher level of economic freedom and governance, as well as higher level of technology will lead to more investments. Besides, if the levels of economic freedom and governance are higher, technology of home country will have a stronger influence on OFDI. (2) As for Japan, Japanese technology capability plays a negative role in OFDI. The better technology capability is, the less Japanese companies invest in these host countries. And this tendency becomes more evident if host countries have better infrastructures. It shows that as a developed country, Japan tends to protect its patents rather than output technology. This tendency of patent protecting is more strong if host countries have better infrastructures.