CAJ | 학술논문

目的：比较分段式教学法和整体式教学法对于基础生命支持（BLS）培训效果的影响。方法将参加BLS培训的住院医师随机分为分段式教学组和整体式教学组，比较两组在培训前、培训后立即以及1月后的考核成绩以及通过率。结果两组医师经过培训后考核成绩均有显著提高。分段式教学组的培训后立即考核的成绩和通过率均高于整体式教学组，但是差异没有统计学意义。培训后1个月的考核成绩和通过率在分段式教学组显著高于整体式教学组（P＜0.05）。结论分段式教学法在保持BLS培训的远期效果方面显著优于整体式教学法。
목적：비교분단식교학법화정체식교학법대우기출생명지지（BLS）배훈효과적영향。방법장삼가BLS배훈적주원의사수궤분위분단식교학조화정체식교학조，비교량조재배훈전、배훈후립즉이급1월후적고핵성적이급통과솔。결과량조의사경과배훈후고핵성적균유현저제고。분단식교학조적배훈후립즉고핵적성적화통과솔균고우정체식교학조，단시차이몰유통계학의의。배훈후1개월적고핵성적화통과솔재분단식교학조현저고우정체식교학조（P＜0.05）。결론분단식교학법재보지BLS배훈적원기효과방면현저우우정체식교학법。
Objective To compare the effects of sectional teaching method(STM) and whole teaching method (WTM) in the training of basic life support(BLS).Method The enrolled residents were randomly separated into STM and WTM groups. The examination scores before BLS training, the day of finishing training, and one month after training were compared between the two groups.Results The examination scores of both groups were significantly improved after training. The examination score and passing ratio of STM group on the day of finishing training were higher than WTM group, but the differences were not statistically significant. But after a month of training, the examination score and passing ratio of STM group were both significantly higher than those of WTM group.Conclusions STM is superior to WTM at keeping the long-term effect of BLS training.