苏州大学学报(教育科学版)
囌州大學學報(教育科學版)
소주대학학보(교육과학판)
Journal of Suzhou University (Educational Science Edition)
2015年
3期
22-38
,共17页
Al Dueck%徐红红
Al Dueck%徐紅紅
Al Dueck%서홍홍
文化%依恋%宗教%本土化研究
文化%依戀%宗教%本土化研究
문화%의련%종교%본토화연구
culture%attachment%religion%indigenous research
有关依恋的研究在西方进展迅速。Bowlby和Ainsworth的工作引起了数以百计有关婴儿与其养育者的依恋类型,例如安全型、非安全型、回避型或混乱型等依恋模式研究。研究表明,安全依恋的类型与健康的同辈关系、养育风格、青少年的自信、浪漫依恋关系,以及成人的灵性等方面显著相关。安全型依恋者与个性化的神具有更积极的关系。然而,批评者认为依恋研究作为一种理念存在西方性偏倚。在更为集体化的群体和社会里,依恋是否表现不同?与以西方个人主义为主导的文化相一致,Ainsworth将安全型依恋等同于独立的基础。然而,从国际化视角来看,有报告显示,非西方的母亲鼓励其子女依赖是为了帮助孩子进入一个以相互依存(interdependence)为主导的社群文化。本文进而探索的问题是,社群型依恋是否与集体型的宗教有关。
有關依戀的研究在西方進展迅速。Bowlby和Ainsworth的工作引起瞭數以百計有關嬰兒與其養育者的依戀類型,例如安全型、非安全型、迴避型或混亂型等依戀模式研究。研究錶明,安全依戀的類型與健康的同輩關繫、養育風格、青少年的自信、浪漫依戀關繫,以及成人的靈性等方麵顯著相關。安全型依戀者與箇性化的神具有更積極的關繫。然而,批評者認為依戀研究作為一種理唸存在西方性偏倚。在更為集體化的群體和社會裏,依戀是否錶現不同?與以西方箇人主義為主導的文化相一緻,Ainsworth將安全型依戀等同于獨立的基礎。然而,從國際化視角來看,有報告顯示,非西方的母親鼓勵其子女依賴是為瞭幫助孩子進入一箇以相互依存(interdependence)為主導的社群文化。本文進而探索的問題是,社群型依戀是否與集體型的宗教有關。
유관의련적연구재서방진전신속。Bowlby화Ainsworth적공작인기료수이백계유관영인여기양육자적의련류형,례여안전형、비안전형、회피형혹혼란형등의련모식연구。연구표명,안전의련적류형여건강적동배관계、양육풍격、청소년적자신、랑만의련관계,이급성인적령성등방면현저상관。안전형의련자여개성화적신구유경적겁적관계。연이,비평자인위의련연구작위일충이념존재서방성편의。재경위집체화적군체화사회리,의련시부표현불동?여이서방개인주의위주도적문화상일치,Ainsworth장안전형의련등동우독립적기출。연이,종국제화시각래간,유보고현시,비서방적모친고려기자녀의뢰시위료방조해자진입일개이상호의존(interdependence)위주도적사군문화。본문진이탐색적문제시,사군형의련시부여집체형적종교유관。
Research on attachment has exploded in the West. From the beginnings in the work of Bowlby and Ainsworth and Bowlby, hundreds of studies have been conducted on styles of attachment of the infant to its caregiver: secure, insecure, avoidant, or disorganized. Moreover, a strong connection has been made between secure attachment styles and healthy peer relationships, parenting approaches, adolescent self-confidence, adult romantic attachment and also adult spirituality. Those with secure attachment styles reported more positive relationships with a personal God. However, the attachment research has been severely criticized for its Western bias. Might attachment be viewed differently in more collective communities and societies? Consistent with the ideology of Western individualistic cultures, Ainsworth equated a secure attachment with the foundation for independence. However, there are reports from non-Western mothers who encourage dependence for the sake of socializing the emerging child into a more interdependent way of relating in a communal culture. This also raises the question whether a more communal style of attachment generates a more social version of religion.