中国组织工程研究
中國組織工程研究
중국조직공정연구
Journal of Clinical Rehabilitative Tissue Engineering Research
2015年
37期
6060-6063
,共4页
组织构建%组织工程%压力生物反馈仪%腰痛%信度评价%国家自然科学基金
組織構建%組織工程%壓力生物反饋儀%腰痛%信度評價%國傢自然科學基金
조직구건%조직공정%압력생물반궤의%요통%신도평개%국가자연과학기금
背景：关于下背痛的治疗方案种类繁多，至今仍没有一个确定的治疗手段。压力生物反馈仪是测量腹部肌肉活性的工具，对腰痛患者测试的信度研究较少。<br> 目的：探讨压力生物反馈仪用于评估腰痛患者的信度及可行性。<br> 方法：将符合入选条件的30例慢性腰痛患者作为受试者，选取4组动作，分别为动作A俯卧位，动作B仰卧屈膝位，动作C仰卧单侧屈髋屈膝位，动作D俯卧单侧肩关节前屈位，分别测试不同动作下的腹内压，由同一测试者在1周内对受试者进行前后两次测试。信度评价指标为组内相关系数(ICC)。<br> 结果与结论：动作A具有良好的信度，ICC值为0.853(95%CI：0.691-0.930)；动作B具有中等相关性，ICC值为0.751(95%CI：0.477-0.882)；动作C具有中等相关性，ICC值为0.789(95%CI：0.557-0.900)；动作D 具有良好的相关性，ICC 值为0.892(95%CI：0.641-0.919)。因此压力生物反馈用于评估腰痛具有良好的信度，可用于腰痛患者的评价。
揹景：關于下揹痛的治療方案種類繁多，至今仍沒有一箇確定的治療手段。壓力生物反饋儀是測量腹部肌肉活性的工具，對腰痛患者測試的信度研究較少。<br> 目的：探討壓力生物反饋儀用于評估腰痛患者的信度及可行性。<br> 方法：將符閤入選條件的30例慢性腰痛患者作為受試者，選取4組動作，分彆為動作A俯臥位，動作B仰臥屈膝位，動作C仰臥單側屈髖屈膝位，動作D俯臥單側肩關節前屈位，分彆測試不同動作下的腹內壓，由同一測試者在1週內對受試者進行前後兩次測試。信度評價指標為組內相關繫數(ICC)。<br> 結果與結論：動作A具有良好的信度，ICC值為0.853(95%CI：0.691-0.930)；動作B具有中等相關性，ICC值為0.751(95%CI：0.477-0.882)；動作C具有中等相關性，ICC值為0.789(95%CI：0.557-0.900)；動作D 具有良好的相關性，ICC 值為0.892(95%CI：0.641-0.919)。因此壓力生物反饋用于評估腰痛具有良好的信度，可用于腰痛患者的評價。
배경：관우하배통적치료방안충류번다，지금잉몰유일개학정적치료수단。압력생물반궤의시측량복부기육활성적공구，대요통환자측시적신도연구교소。<br> 목적：탐토압력생물반궤의용우평고요통환자적신도급가행성。<br> 방법：장부합입선조건적30례만성요통환자작위수시자，선취4조동작，분별위동작A부와위，동작B앙와굴슬위，동작C앙와단측굴관굴슬위，동작D부와단측견관절전굴위，분별측시불동동작하적복내압，유동일측시자재1주내대수시자진행전후량차측시。신도평개지표위조내상관계수(ICC)。<br> 결과여결론：동작A구유량호적신도，ICC치위0.853(95%CI：0.691-0.930)；동작B구유중등상관성，ICC치위0.751(95%CI：0.477-0.882)；동작C구유중등상관성，ICC치위0.789(95%CI：0.557-0.900)；동작D 구유량호적상관성，ICC 치위0.892(95%CI：0.641-0.919)。인차압력생물반궤용우평고요통구유량호적신도，가용우요통환자적평개。
BACKGROUND:Treatment programs for low back pain are of great varieties, but there is stil no a definite treatment. Pressure biofeedback instrument is a tool to measure abdominal muscle activity, and its reliability in the treatment of low back pain is less reported. OBJECTIVE:To explore the reliability and feasibility of the pressure biofeedback instrument for assessment of low back pain. METHODS:Thirty patients with chronic low back pain were enrol ed and subject to four kinds of postures:posture A was prone position;posture B was supine position with flexion of the knee joints, posture C was supine position with unilateral flexion of the hip and knee joint, posture D was prone position with unilateral shoulder flexion. Intra-abdominal pressure values under the different postures were measured twice within a week in the same subject. Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was used to assess the reliability. RESULTS AND CONCLUSION:Posture A had good test-retest reliability, and the value of ICC was 0.853 (95%confidence interval:0.691-0.930);posture B showed moderate test-retest reliability, and the ICC value was 0.751 (95%confidence interval:0.477-0.882);posture C also had moderate test-retest reliability, and the ICC value was 0.789 (95%confidence interval:0.557-0.900), posture D had good test-retest reliability, and the value of ICC was 0.892 (95%confidence interval:0.641-0.919). Therefore, the pressure biofeedback for evaluation of low back pain has good reliability, which can be used for the evaluation of low back pain.
