北京大学学报(医学版)
北京大學學報(醫學版)
북경대학학보(의학판)
Journal of Peking University (Health Sciences)
2015年
5期
781-786
,共6页
王昱%郝燕捷%邓雪蓉%李光韬%耿研%赵娟%周炜%张卓莉
王昱%郝燕捷%鄧雪蓉%李光韜%耿研%趙娟%週煒%張卓莉
왕욱%학연첩%산설용%리광도%경연%조연%주위%장탁리
关节炎,类风湿%骨质疏松性骨折%概率%骨密度%危险因素
關節炎,類風濕%骨質疏鬆性骨摺%概率%骨密度%危險因素
관절염,류풍습%골질소송성골절%개솔%골밀도%위험인소
Arthritis,rheumatoid%Osteoporotic fractures%Probability%Bone density%Risk factors
目的:了解计算骨折危险性评估工具( fracture risk assessment tool ,FRAX)时,使用与不使用骨密度( bone mineral density,BMD)对中国类风湿关节炎(rheumatoid arthritis,RA)患者骨折概率的影响,分析影响骨量的因素。方法:2009年12月至2012年12月于北京大学第一医院门诊及病房首次就诊的年龄大于40岁RA患者200例,双能X线测定腰椎和左髋部BMD,将使用与不使用BMD或T值计算的FRAX骨折概率进行比较,并结合患者的性别、年龄、绝经时间、体重指数、病程以及激素应用等因素进行相关性分析。结果:200例患者平均年龄(59.4±10.2)岁,77.5%为女性。有77例患者接受了双能X线检查,其中BMD正常和异常组分别为10例(13%)和67例(87%),有32例患者发生骨折。两组患者在平均年龄、糖皮质激素使用(用药时间、累积剂量、目前日平均剂量)、FRAX预测主要部位和髋部骨折风险之间差异均有统计学意义。使用与不使用BMD、T值计算的未来10年骨折概率差异无统计学差异。结合T值得出的FRAX预测骨折风险的ROC曲线下面积最大(0.899)。以腰椎及髋部的BMD作为结果变量,对影响患者BMD的因素进行多元回归分析显示:患者的疼痛评分(P=0.02)、既往发生骨折(P=0.003)、糖皮质激素的累积剂量(P=0.008)是引起腰椎骨量异常的危险因素,患者的年龄(P<0.001)、已绝经(P=0.05)、既往发生骨折(P=0.003)、体重指数(P=0.03)是引起左髋部骨量异常的危险因素。结论:RA患者骨折发生比例较高,主要部位和髋部骨折风险均增加,结合股骨颈BMD或T值计算FRAX能更有效地预测骨折概率。
目的:瞭解計算骨摺危險性評估工具( fracture risk assessment tool ,FRAX)時,使用與不使用骨密度( bone mineral density,BMD)對中國類風濕關節炎(rheumatoid arthritis,RA)患者骨摺概率的影響,分析影響骨量的因素。方法:2009年12月至2012年12月于北京大學第一醫院門診及病房首次就診的年齡大于40歲RA患者200例,雙能X線測定腰椎和左髖部BMD,將使用與不使用BMD或T值計算的FRAX骨摺概率進行比較,併結閤患者的性彆、年齡、絕經時間、體重指數、病程以及激素應用等因素進行相關性分析。結果:200例患者平均年齡(59.4±10.2)歲,77.5%為女性。有77例患者接受瞭雙能X線檢查,其中BMD正常和異常組分彆為10例(13%)和67例(87%),有32例患者髮生骨摺。兩組患者在平均年齡、糖皮質激素使用(用藥時間、纍積劑量、目前日平均劑量)、FRAX預測主要部位和髖部骨摺風險之間差異均有統計學意義。使用與不使用BMD、T值計算的未來10年骨摺概率差異無統計學差異。結閤T值得齣的FRAX預測骨摺風險的ROC麯線下麵積最大(0.899)。以腰椎及髖部的BMD作為結果變量,對影響患者BMD的因素進行多元迴歸分析顯示:患者的疼痛評分(P=0.02)、既往髮生骨摺(P=0.003)、糖皮質激素的纍積劑量(P=0.008)是引起腰椎骨量異常的危險因素,患者的年齡(P<0.001)、已絕經(P=0.05)、既往髮生骨摺(P=0.003)、體重指數(P=0.03)是引起左髖部骨量異常的危險因素。結論:RA患者骨摺髮生比例較高,主要部位和髖部骨摺風險均增加,結閤股骨頸BMD或T值計算FRAX能更有效地預測骨摺概率。
목적:료해계산골절위험성평고공구( fracture risk assessment tool ,FRAX)시,사용여불사용골밀도( bone mineral density,BMD)대중국류풍습관절염(rheumatoid arthritis,RA)환자골절개솔적영향,분석영향골량적인소。방법:2009년12월지2012년12월우북경대학제일의원문진급병방수차취진적년령대우40세RA환자200례,쌍능X선측정요추화좌관부BMD,장사용여불사용BMD혹T치계산적FRAX골절개솔진행비교,병결합환자적성별、년령、절경시간、체중지수、병정이급격소응용등인소진행상관성분석。결과:200례환자평균년령(59.4±10.2)세,77.5%위녀성。유77례환자접수료쌍능X선검사,기중BMD정상화이상조분별위10례(13%)화67례(87%),유32례환자발생골절。량조환자재평균년령、당피질격소사용(용약시간、루적제량、목전일평균제량)、FRAX예측주요부위화관부골절풍험지간차이균유통계학의의。사용여불사용BMD、T치계산적미래10년골절개솔차이무통계학차이。결합T치득출적FRAX예측골절풍험적ROC곡선하면적최대(0.899)。이요추급관부적BMD작위결과변량,대영향환자BMD적인소진행다원회귀분석현시:환자적동통평분(P=0.02)、기왕발생골절(P=0.003)、당피질격소적루적제량(P=0.008)시인기요추골량이상적위험인소,환자적년령(P<0.001)、이절경(P=0.05)、기왕발생골절(P=0.003)、체중지수(P=0.03)시인기좌관부골량이상적위험인소。결론:RA환자골절발생비례교고,주요부위화관부골절풍험균증가,결합고골경BMD혹T치계산FRAX능경유효지예측골절개솔。
Objective:To verify the fracture risk assessment tool ( FRAX) to estimate the probability of osteoporotic fracture in patients with rheumatoid arthritis ( RA ) with or without bone mineral density (BMD), and identify associated risk factors of osteoporosis .Methods: In the study, 200 patients with rheumatoid arthritis aged more than 40 years in Peking University First Hospital from Dec .2009 to Dec. 2012 were recruited.Clinical information was obtained from a questionnaire of their case history and medical records.FRAX tool was administered.Their lumber spine and left femoral BMD were determined by dual energy X ray absorptiometry.The gender, age, disease duration, menopause status, body mass index ( BMI) and accumulative dose of glucocorticoid were obtained in retrospect .Correlation analysis was conducted between the BMD and clinical information .Results:The study population ( female, 77.5%) had a mean age of 59.4 years, in which 10 (13%) patients showed a normal BMD, 67 (87%) were osteopenia or osteoporosis , while 32 patients (16%) had fragile fracture.Compared with the patients with normal BMD, the subjects with low BMD had significantly older age , longer period for corticoids usage , higher day dose and accumulated dose of corticoids .The 10-year fracture risk of sustai-ning major osteoporotic fractures and hip fracture was higher .No significant difference was observed be-tween the 10-year fracture risks calculated with BMD and without BMD .The values of the different area under the receiver operating characteristic ( ROC) curve ( AUC) for major and hip fractures calculated in three ways:without BMD, with the femoral neck BMD, and with T-score.The best result was for FRAX tool for hip fracture with the T-score ( AUC 0 .899 ) .A stepwise multivariate linear regression model was constructed to explore the relationship between the different clinical factors studied and a low BMD . Three statistically significant variables for lumber BMD were pain on visual assessment scale ( VAS ) (P=0.02), fracture history (P=0.003) and a higher steroid accumulated dose (P=0.008).Three statistically significant variables for left hip BMD were age (P<0.001), fracture history (P=0.05) and lower BMI ( P=0.03) .Conclusion:Low BMD is a common complication in RA patients .Risk factors for major fracture and hip fracture are increased .There is a positive correlation between FRAX calculated with and without BMD or T score .FRAX with the femoral neck T score or BMD presents a discriminatory capacity better than FRAX without BMD , according to the AUC ROC .