中国卫生标准管理
中國衛生標準管理
중국위생표준관리
China Health Standard Management
2015年
26期
47-48
,共2页
单纯修补术%胃大部分切除术%急性胃穿孔%效果
單純脩補術%胃大部分切除術%急性胃穿孔%效果
단순수보술%위대부분절제술%급성위천공%효과
Simple repair%Most of gastric resection%Acute gastric perforation%The effect
目的：观察单纯修补术与胃大部分切除术治疗急性胃穿孔的效果。方法74例急性胃穿孔患者随机分为治疗组和实验组，实验组采用单纯修补术，治疗组采用胃大部分切除术。结果治疗组远期复发率为5.41%，实验组为18.92%，两组对比差异显著（P＜0.05）。结论急性胃穿孔患者采用两种不同手术方式都有较好的临床应用疗效，可以明显改善患者的相关指标结果，同时降低术后不良反应发生率。
目的：觀察單純脩補術與胃大部分切除術治療急性胃穿孔的效果。方法74例急性胃穿孔患者隨機分為治療組和實驗組，實驗組採用單純脩補術，治療組採用胃大部分切除術。結果治療組遠期複髮率為5.41%，實驗組為18.92%，兩組對比差異顯著（P＜0.05）。結論急性胃穿孔患者採用兩種不同手術方式都有較好的臨床應用療效，可以明顯改善患者的相關指標結果，同時降低術後不良反應髮生率。
목적：관찰단순수보술여위대부분절제술치료급성위천공적효과。방법74례급성위천공환자수궤분위치료조화실험조，실험조채용단순수보술，치료조채용위대부분절제술。결과치료조원기복발솔위5.41%，실험조위18.92%，량조대비차이현저（P＜0.05）。결론급성위천공환자채용량충불동수술방식도유교호적림상응용료효，가이명현개선환자적상관지표결과，동시강저술후불량반응발생솔。
Objective To observe the simple repair and most gastric resection for the treatment of acute gastric perforation.Methods 74 cases of acute gastric perforation patients were randomly divided into treatment group and experimental group, the experimental group USES the simple repair, the treatment group USES the most gastric resection.ResultsThe treatment group long-term recurrence rate was 5.41%, the experimental group was 18.92%, significantly difference compared the two groups (P< 0.05).Conclusion Acute gastric perforation were treated by two different operation method has better clinical curative effect, can significantly improve the patient's relevant indicators as a result, at the same time reduce the incidence of postoperative adverse reactions.
