齐齐哈尔医学院学报
齊齊哈爾醫學院學報
제제합이의학원학보
Journal of Qiqihar University of Medicine
2015年
28期
4323-4325
,共3页
轴式滚动移位法%胸腰椎骨折%疼痛%满意度
軸式滾動移位法%胸腰椎骨摺%疼痛%滿意度
축식곤동이위법%흉요추골절%동통%만의도
Rolling carry method%Thoracotumbar fractures%Pain%Satisfaction
目的:探讨轴式滚动移位法和传统平抬搬运法护理胸腰椎骨折患者的疼痛影响,比较其效果,指导临床护理工作。方法将40例患者分为观察组和对照组,每组各20例。观察组采用轴式滚动移位法,对照组采用传统的2~3人搬运患者法,两组患者均采用心理疏导,消除紧张,缓解患者心理压力。比较两组患者搬运前后疼痛变化情况,对两组患者进行满意度调查。结果采用轴式滚动移位法和传统搬运法搬运患者的疼痛评分比较,差异有统计学意义( Z=1.973,P<0.05);轴式滚动移位法搬运患者的满意度为90.0%(18/21),优于传统搬运法的65.0%(13/21),差异有统计学意义(χ2=14.547,P =0.000)。结论采用轴式滚动移位法搬运患者可减轻搬运过程中疼痛,提高了患者对护理服务的满意度,是一种理想的护理方式。
目的:探討軸式滾動移位法和傳統平抬搬運法護理胸腰椎骨摺患者的疼痛影響,比較其效果,指導臨床護理工作。方法將40例患者分為觀察組和對照組,每組各20例。觀察組採用軸式滾動移位法,對照組採用傳統的2~3人搬運患者法,兩組患者均採用心理疏導,消除緊張,緩解患者心理壓力。比較兩組患者搬運前後疼痛變化情況,對兩組患者進行滿意度調查。結果採用軸式滾動移位法和傳統搬運法搬運患者的疼痛評分比較,差異有統計學意義( Z=1.973,P<0.05);軸式滾動移位法搬運患者的滿意度為90.0%(18/21),優于傳統搬運法的65.0%(13/21),差異有統計學意義(χ2=14.547,P =0.000)。結論採用軸式滾動移位法搬運患者可減輕搬運過程中疼痛,提高瞭患者對護理服務的滿意度,是一種理想的護理方式。
목적:탐토축식곤동이위법화전통평태반운법호리흉요추골절환자적동통영향,비교기효과,지도림상호리공작。방법장40례환자분위관찰조화대조조,매조각20례。관찰조채용축식곤동이위법,대조조채용전통적2~3인반운환자법,량조환자균채용심리소도,소제긴장,완해환자심리압력。비교량조환자반운전후동통변화정황,대량조환자진행만의도조사。결과채용축식곤동이위법화전통반운법반운환자적동통평분비교,차이유통계학의의( Z=1.973,P<0.05);축식곤동이위법반운환자적만의도위90.0%(18/21),우우전통반운법적65.0%(13/21),차이유통계학의의(χ2=14.547,P =0.000)。결론채용축식곤동이위법반운환자가감경반운과정중동통,제고료환자대호리복무적만의도,시일충이상적호리방식。
Objective To investigate the rolling shaft displacement method and traditional flat lift handling care act thoracolumbar fractures affect pain patients, compare its results to guide clinical care. Methods The 40 patients were divided into two groups and the control group, 20 cases in each group. Observation group rolling shaft displacement method, the control group using the traditional method of 2 ~3 peoples handling patients, two groups of patients were treated with psychological counseling, eliminate stress, relieve mental stress.Two groups were compared before and after handling the pain changes, two groups of patients satisfaction surveys.Results Axial displacement method using rolling and handling patient handling traditional method of pain scores, the difference was statistically significant ( Z =1.973, P <0.05 ); scroll handling patient satisfaction shaft displacement method was 90.0% (18/21), 65.0% better than (13/21) traditional method of transportation, the difference was statistically significant (χ2 =14.547, P =0.000). Conclusions Scroll using the shaft displacement method can reduce patient handling during transportation pain, and improve patients'satisfaction with care, and is an ideal way of care.