CAJ | 학술논문

目的：结合护理专业特点，通过实验教学改革，提高护理学专业人体解剖学教学质量。方法将2013级护理专科一、二班学生设为研究对象。一班为实验组110人，二班为对照组110人。实验班通过调整教学大纲和教学内容，改革教学方法，提高教学质量。教学对照班采用传统实验教学法。采用考试成绩评价及问卷调查进行教学效果评价。采用SPSS 13.0软件进行分析， t检验比较两组学生的理论考试成绩、实验平时成绩、实验考试成绩及总分成绩。结果实验组理论考试成绩[（47.80±7.30） vs.（44.85±8.38）]、实验平时成绩[（15.48±1.76） vs.（14.55±2.19）]、实验考试成绩[（15.52±2.22）vs.（14.35±2.64）]、总分[（78.80±8.99） vs.（73.75±10.53）]均优于对照组（P<0.05）。问卷调查显示，80%以上的学生认为实验教学改革有助于提高教学效果。结论实验教学改革能够明显提高学生人体解剖学成绩，提升教学效果，值得推广。
목적：결합호리전업특점，통과실험교학개혁，제고호이학전업인체해부학교학질량。방법장2013급호리전과일、이반학생설위연구대상。일반위실험조110인，이반위대조조110인。실험반통과조정교학대강화교학내용，개혁교학방법，제고교학질량。교학대조반채용전통실험교학법。채용고시성적평개급문권조사진행교학효과평개。채용SPSS 13.0연건진행분석， t검험비교량조학생적이론고시성적、실험평시성적、실험고시성적급총분성적。결과실험조이론고시성적[（47.80±7.30） vs.（44.85±8.38）]、실험평시성적[（15.48±1.76） vs.（14.55±2.19）]、실험고시성적[（15.52±2.22）vs.（14.35±2.64）]、총분[（78.80±8.99） vs.（73.75±10.53）]균우우대조조（P<0.05）。문권조사현시，80%이상적학생인위실험교학개혁유조우제고교학효과。결론실험교학개혁능구명현제고학생인체해부학성적，제승교학효과，치득추엄。
Objective In order to improve the teaching effectiveness of anatomy in nursing, this article made an exploration on the experimental teaching reform combined with the characteristics of nursing profession. Methods The nursing students of class 1and 2 of 2013were set as the research object. The class 1 (110) as experimental class, class 2 (110) for the control group. In the experimental class, the reform of teaching method and teaching quality was improved by adjusting the teaching syl-labus and teaching contents. The control class used the traditional experimental teaching method. The experiment class' teaching reform research of the human anatomy carried on the 1 semester. Exam achievement evaluation and the questionnaire survey were adopted to assess the teaching effect. SPSS 13.0 software was used to do statistical analysis and t test was used to compare two groups of students test scores, experiment grades, test scores and total scores. Results Experimental theory examination results [(47.80±7.30) vs. (44.85±8.38)], experiment grades [(15.48±1.76) vs. (14.55±2.19)], ex-periment test scores [(15.52±2.22) vs. (14.35±2.64)], total score [(78.80±8.99) vs. (73.75±10.53)] were better than control group (P<0.05). In questionnaire survey,more than 80% of the students think that the reformed teaching method can help to improve the teaching effect. Conclusion In human anatomy experiment teaching reform, the "reformed experiment teaching method" can significantly improve students' scores and the teaching effect. It is better than the traditional method, and is worth publicizing.