中国美容医学
中國美容醫學
중국미용의학
Chinese Journal of Aesthetic Medicine
2015年
17期
42-45
,共4页
活动翼矫治技术%拔牙间隙%方丝弓矫治技术%间隙速度
活動翼矯治技術%拔牙間隙%方絲弓矯治技術%間隙速度
활동익교치기술%발아간극%방사궁교치기술%간극속도
movable wing orthodontic edgewise technique of extraction space clearance speed
目的:对活动翼矫治技术关闭拔牙间隙的临床效果进行研究.方法:选取2013年1月-2013年12月于我院接受治疗的60例尖牙正畸患者作为研究对象,随机分为治疗组和对照组,各30例患者.治疗组采用活动翼矫治器进行治疗,对照组采用方丝弓矫治器进行治疗,对两组患者的尖牙牙根长度变化、尖牙牙槽骨高度变化、间隙关闭速度、患者满意度等指标进行比较.观察对比两组患者的具体治疗效果,包括治疗时间、显效时间、有无复发等情况.结果:在关闭间隙速度上,治疗组为(0.95±0.03)个月,对照组为(0.80±0.03)个月,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);两组患者在尖牙牙根长度变化、尖牙牙槽骨高度变化两项指标比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);在患者满意度上,治疗组患者满意度为93.33%,对照组患者满意度为73.33%,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05).结论:活动翼矫治技术能更加快速地关闭拔牙间隙,而且比较安全,疼痛感也较少,值得临床推广应用.
目的:對活動翼矯治技術關閉拔牙間隙的臨床效果進行研究.方法:選取2013年1月-2013年12月于我院接受治療的60例尖牙正畸患者作為研究對象,隨機分為治療組和對照組,各30例患者.治療組採用活動翼矯治器進行治療,對照組採用方絲弓矯治器進行治療,對兩組患者的尖牙牙根長度變化、尖牙牙槽骨高度變化、間隙關閉速度、患者滿意度等指標進行比較.觀察對比兩組患者的具體治療效果,包括治療時間、顯效時間、有無複髮等情況.結果:在關閉間隙速度上,治療組為(0.95±0.03)箇月,對照組為(0.80±0.03)箇月,差異有統計學意義(P<0.05);兩組患者在尖牙牙根長度變化、尖牙牙槽骨高度變化兩項指標比較,差異無統計學意義(P>0.05);在患者滿意度上,治療組患者滿意度為93.33%,對照組患者滿意度為73.33%,差異有統計學意義(P<0.05).結論:活動翼矯治技術能更加快速地關閉拔牙間隙,而且比較安全,疼痛感也較少,值得臨床推廣應用.
목적:대활동익교치기술관폐발아간극적림상효과진행연구.방법:선취2013년1월-2013년12월우아원접수치료적60례첨아정기환자작위연구대상,수궤분위치료조화대조조,각30례환자.치료조채용활동익교치기진행치료,대조조채용방사궁교치기진행치료,대량조환자적첨아아근장도변화、첨아아조골고도변화、간극관폐속도、환자만의도등지표진행비교.관찰대비량조환자적구체치료효과,포괄치료시간、현효시간、유무복발등정황.결과:재관폐간극속도상,치료조위(0.95±0.03)개월,대조조위(0.80±0.03)개월,차이유통계학의의(P<0.05);량조환자재첨아아근장도변화、첨아아조골고도변화량항지표비교,차이무통계학의의(P>0.05);재환자만의도상,치료조환자만의도위93.33%,대조조환자만의도위73.33%,차이유통계학의의(P<0.05).결론:활동익교치기술능경가쾌속지관폐발아간극,이차비교안전,동통감야교소,치득림상추엄응용.
Objective To study the clinical effect of the treatment of the closed tooth extraction with the active wing. Methods A total of 2013 during January to December 2013 in our hospital accepted treatment of 60 cases of canine orthodontic patients as the research object,randomly divided into treatment group and control group,two groups with 30 cases in each patient.Treatment group were used active wing appliance treatment,the control group were treated with edgewise appliance,the variation in the canine root length of two groups of patients,canine alveolar bone height changes,the gap closed speed,patient satisfaction,and other indicators were compared.Observation and comparison of two groups of patients with specific treatment effect,including treatment time, effective time, there is no recurrence,etc. Results in closing the gap rate,treatment group were(0.95±0.03) months,control group (0.80 ± 0.03)months,the two groups of patients with significant difference compared,with statistical significance(P<0.05);two groups of patients in the canine root length change,canine alveolar bone height changes two index difference was not statistically significant(P>0.05) compared to the;in patient satisfaction,the satisfaction rate of patients of the treatment group was 93.33,the control group of patients satisfaction was 73.33%,two groups in patient satisfaction compared with significant difference, with statistical significance(P<0.05). Conclusion The technology of active wing correction can close the extraction space more quickly,and it is safe and less pain,it is worthy of clinical application.