铁道工程学报
鐵道工程學報
철도공정학보
Journal of Railway Engineering Society
2015年
9期
13-18
,共6页
黔张常铁路%岩溶区%坡度方案%比选
黔張常鐵路%巖溶區%坡度方案%比選
검장상철로%암용구%파도방안%비선
Qianjiang -Zhangjiajie -Changde Railway%karst region%gradient scheme%comparison and selection
研究目的:黔江至张家界至常德铁路是一条客货共线、以客为主的区际干线铁路。由于沿线岩溶发育典型,工程地质构造极为复杂,工程投资大,需要对不同的坡度方案进行比选,以便确定合理的线路坡度。本文结合地形地貌、地层岩性、地质构造以及岩溶,对比13‰和18‰坡度方案的工程投资和工程风险,分析牵引质量、机车类型合理组合及其与相邻线协调匹配情况,并对运输质量与运营成本进行经济评价。研究结论:通过方案比选研究得出:(1)两个坡度方案均可满足相关运营安全要求;(2)通过工程风险及工程投资分析,18‰优于13‰坡度方案,能降低施工难度,减少运营风险,节约运营费用,建议本线坡度采用18‰方案;(3)黔张常铁路坡度方案的比选过程,可供其他类似岩溶地区铁路坡度比选参考。
研究目的:黔江至張傢界至常德鐵路是一條客貨共線、以客為主的區際榦線鐵路。由于沿線巖溶髮育典型,工程地質構造極為複雜,工程投資大,需要對不同的坡度方案進行比選,以便確定閤理的線路坡度。本文結閤地形地貌、地層巖性、地質構造以及巖溶,對比13‰和18‰坡度方案的工程投資和工程風險,分析牽引質量、機車類型閤理組閤及其與相鄰線協調匹配情況,併對運輸質量與運營成本進行經濟評價。研究結論:通過方案比選研究得齣:(1)兩箇坡度方案均可滿足相關運營安全要求;(2)通過工程風險及工程投資分析,18‰優于13‰坡度方案,能降低施工難度,減少運營風險,節約運營費用,建議本線坡度採用18‰方案;(3)黔張常鐵路坡度方案的比選過程,可供其他類似巖溶地區鐵路坡度比選參攷。
연구목적:검강지장가계지상덕철로시일조객화공선、이객위주적구제간선철로。유우연선암용발육전형,공정지질구조겁위복잡,공정투자대,수요대불동적파도방안진행비선,이편학정합리적선로파도。본문결합지형지모、지층암성、지질구조이급암용,대비13‰화18‰파도방안적공정투자화공정풍험,분석견인질량、궤차류형합리조합급기여상린선협조필배정황,병대운수질량여운영성본진행경제평개。연구결론:통과방안비선연구득출:(1)량개파도방안균가만족상관운영안전요구;(2)통과공정풍험급공정투자분석,18‰우우13‰파도방안,능강저시공난도,감소운영풍험,절약운영비용,건의본선파도채용18‰방안;(3)검장상철로파도방안적비선과정,가공기타유사암용지구철로파도비선삼고。
Research purposes:Qianjiang -Zhangjiajie -Changde Railway is a regional trunk railway,shared by both passenger and freight trains,but mainly employed for passenger trains.Because of the typical karst development along the railways,the geological construction is very complicated,and the project investment is huge.Thus,different gradient schemes should be compared and selected,in order to determine the most reasonable gradient for the railway. Incorporated with the geological features along the railway,the project investment and risks of 1 3‰ and 1 8‰ gradient schemes were compared and selected.The tractive tonnage,reasonable combination of locomotive types and their compatibilities with the nearby railways were analyzed.Additionally,the transport quality and operating costs were economically evaluated. Research conclusions:We can draw the following conclusions through comparing and selecting the schemes:(1 )The both gradient schemes meet the relevant safety requirements for operation.(2)1 8‰ gradient scheme is better than the one of 1 3‰ due to lower project risks and investment.Therefore,1 8‰ gradient scheme is recommended.(3)The process of comparison and selection of gradient schemes for Qianjiang -Zhangjiajie -Changde Railway could be employed as a reference for comparison and selection of gradient schemes of railways in karst regions.