中华关节外科杂志(电子版)
中華關節外科雜誌(電子版)
중화관절외과잡지(전자판)
Chinese Journal of Joint Surgery (Electronic Version)
2015年
5期
603-607
,共5页
张清%白云静%纪泉%句朝辉%张贺民%刘德全
張清%白雲靜%紀泉%句朝輝%張賀民%劉德全
장청%백운정%기천%구조휘%장하민%류덕전
骨关节炎,膝%中药外敷%虎力散胶囊
骨關節炎,膝%中藥外敷%虎力散膠囊
골관절염,슬%중약외부%호력산효낭
Osteoarthritis,knee%External application%Hulisan capsul
目的:评价虎力散外用治疗膝骨关节炎(OA)的有效性和安全性。方法研究采用多中心合作,随机对照的方法将500例诊断为膝OA的患者分为两组。试验组350例,采用中药虎力散胶囊外敷,Qd;对照组150例,采用双氯芬酸二乙胺乳胶剂外用,Tid;这些患者连续用药14 d,观察两组患者的疗效和不良反应。结果共有442例患者完成了试验,其中试验组306例,对照组136例。(1)治疗14 d后,两组患者VAS疼痛评分和关节功能评分较治疗前均有明显改善(P<0.01);(2)虎力散外敷组在降低VAS疼痛评分和改善关节功能评分方面显著优于双氯芬酸二乙胺乳胶剂组( P<0.01);(3)出现的可能与试验药物相关的不良事件的比例在虎力散组和对照组分别为1.63%和0.74%,主要为皮肤过敏,停药后均能消失,不良反应发生率两组之间无统计学差异( P>0.05)。结论虎力散胶囊外敷治疗膝关节OA,可使关节疼痛症状在2周内消失或好转,并在一定程度上改善关节功能,不良反应少,安全性好。
目的:評價虎力散外用治療膝骨關節炎(OA)的有效性和安全性。方法研究採用多中心閤作,隨機對照的方法將500例診斷為膝OA的患者分為兩組。試驗組350例,採用中藥虎力散膠囊外敷,Qd;對照組150例,採用雙氯芬痠二乙胺乳膠劑外用,Tid;這些患者連續用藥14 d,觀察兩組患者的療效和不良反應。結果共有442例患者完成瞭試驗,其中試驗組306例,對照組136例。(1)治療14 d後,兩組患者VAS疼痛評分和關節功能評分較治療前均有明顯改善(P<0.01);(2)虎力散外敷組在降低VAS疼痛評分和改善關節功能評分方麵顯著優于雙氯芬痠二乙胺乳膠劑組( P<0.01);(3)齣現的可能與試驗藥物相關的不良事件的比例在虎力散組和對照組分彆為1.63%和0.74%,主要為皮膚過敏,停藥後均能消失,不良反應髮生率兩組之間無統計學差異( P>0.05)。結論虎力散膠囊外敷治療膝關節OA,可使關節疼痛癥狀在2週內消失或好轉,併在一定程度上改善關節功能,不良反應少,安全性好。
목적:평개호력산외용치료슬골관절염(OA)적유효성화안전성。방법연구채용다중심합작,수궤대조적방법장500례진단위슬OA적환자분위량조。시험조350례,채용중약호력산효낭외부,Qd;대조조150례,채용쌍록분산이을알유효제외용,Tid;저사환자련속용약14 d,관찰량조환자적료효화불량반응。결과공유442례환자완성료시험,기중시험조306례,대조조136례。(1)치료14 d후,량조환자VAS동통평분화관절공능평분교치료전균유명현개선(P<0.01);(2)호력산외부조재강저VAS동통평분화개선관절공능평분방면현저우우쌍록분산이을알유효제조( P<0.01);(3)출현적가능여시험약물상관적불량사건적비례재호력산조화대조조분별위1.63%화0.74%,주요위피부과민,정약후균능소실,불량반응발생솔량조지간무통계학차이( P>0.05)。결론호력산효낭외부치료슬관절OA,가사관절동통증상재2주내소실혹호전,병재일정정도상개선관절공능,불량반응소,안전성호。
Objective To evaluate the efficacy and safety of the external application of traditional Chinese medicine Hulisan capsule for the treatment of knee osteoarthritis ( OA ) . Methods A randomized, positive-controlled and multi-center clinical trial was carried out.Five-hundred patients with knee OA were recruited and randomly divided into two groups:the treatment group and the control group. Each patient of the treatment group ( n=350 ) was given eight Hulisan capsules for external application once a day, while the patients of the control group ( n=150) adopted diclofenac emulsion three times per day.Both the groups were treated for 14 days.The changes of symptoms and signs before and after the treatment and the incidence of adverse events were observed.Results A total of 442 patients completed the trial.After 14 days treatment, the visual analog scale (VAS) pain score and the joint function score of the two groups were significantly improved ( P<0.01 ) compared with those before the treatment; but the VAS score and the joint function score were improved better in the treatment group than in the control group (P<0.01).The incidences of related side effects (mainly as skin allergies) of the Hulisan capsule and the diclofenac emulsions were 1.63% and 0.74% respectively, and no statistical difference between the two groups ( P>0.05) .Conclusion External application of Hulisan capsule can significantly reduce the joint pain and improve joint function within two weeks with a good safety profile of low incidence of adverse reaction.