CAJ | 학술논문

目的：：探究静脉穿刺后两种拔针方式对患者引起的疼痛反应及皮下淤血状况.方法：采用观察法法，将2013年4月~2014年5月本院干部病房收治的962例患者进行随机分组观察，将所有患者随机分成对照组和观察组，每组481例，对照组采用传统的拔针方法，先按压后拔针，观察组采用先拔针后按压的方法，对比两组患者的疼痛反应及皮下淤血情况.结果：采用先拔后压法引起的疼痛及皮下淤血状况明显低于传统的先压后拔法，患者的疼痛不明显且淤血面积趋于无，两组对比观察有统计学差异 P ＜0．05.结论：静脉穿刺后，采用先拔后压针的方法明显能够减轻患者的疼痛，同时减少患者淤血面积，其临床效果比较满意，在临床护理工作中值得推广和应用.
목적：：탐구정맥천자후량충발침방식대환자인기적동통반응급피하어혈상황.방법：채용관찰법법，장2013년4월~2014년5월본원간부병방수치적962례환자진행수궤분조관찰，장소유환자수궤분성대조조화관찰조，매조481례，대조조채용전통적발침방법，선안압후발침，관찰조채용선발침후안압적방법，대비량조환자적동통반응급피하어혈정황.결과：채용선발후압법인기적동통급피하어혈상황명현저우전통적선압후발법，환자적동통불명현차어혈면적추우무，량조대비관찰유통계학차이 P ＜0．05.결론：정맥천자후，채용선발후압침적방법명현능구감경환자적동통，동시감소환자어혈면적，기림상효과비교만의，재림상호리공작중치득추엄화응용.
Objective:to explore the pain reaction and subcutaneous ecchymosis of two way pull out needle after venipuncture.Methods:To use investigation and analysis,randomly divided 21 98 cases of patients into two groups during April 2013 to May 2014 in VIP ward of our hospital,control group and observation group,1099 cases in each group and the control group with traditional needle method,pull out needle after pressure first,observation group with the method of first dial needle afG ter press,compare the pain and subcutaneous ecchymosis of two groups.Results:the pain and subcuG taneous ecchymosis of observation group were lower than that in control group.the pain of observation group is not obvious,and subcutaneous ecchymosis area tends to be no,compared two groups,there is significant difference (P < 0.05).Conclusion:To adopt the method of press puncture point after pull out needle can obviously reduce the patient's pain and subcutaneous ecchymosis,the clinical effect is satisfied,and it is worth to promote and applicate in the clinical nursing work.