中国卫生标准管理
中國衛生標準管理
중국위생표준관리
China Health Standard Management
2015年
26期
195-196
,共2页
慢性阻塞性肺疾病%综合护理%效果
慢性阻塞性肺疾病%綜閤護理%效果
만성조새성폐질병%종합호리%효과
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease%Comprehensive care%Effect
目的：研究综合护理对慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者的实施效果。方法研究对象取2014年4月～2015年4月本院慢性阻塞性肺疾病64例，依照护理方式差异进行分组。32例为综合护理，入组研究组；余32例实施常规护理，入组对照组。观察效果，予以组间比较。结果组间相比，研究组护理有效率高（P＜0.05），有显著性差异。结论慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者经过综合护理，效果可靠。
目的：研究綜閤護理對慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者的實施效果。方法研究對象取2014年4月～2015年4月本院慢性阻塞性肺疾病64例，依照護理方式差異進行分組。32例為綜閤護理，入組研究組；餘32例實施常規護理，入組對照組。觀察效果，予以組間比較。結果組間相比，研究組護理有效率高（P＜0.05），有顯著性差異。結論慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者經過綜閤護理，效果可靠。
목적：연구종합호리대만성조새성폐질병환자적실시효과。방법연구대상취2014년4월～2015년4월본원만성조새성폐질병64례，의조호리방식차이진행분조。32례위종합호리，입조연구조；여32례실시상규호리，입조대조조。관찰효과，여이조간비교。결과조간상비，연구조호리유효솔고（P＜0.05），유현저성차이。결론만성조새성폐질병환자경과종합호리，효과가고。
ObjectiveComprehensive care effect on patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease is to be studied.Methods Choose 64 patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease who are treated in hospital from April 2014 to April 2015 and separate them into two groups according to different care methods, 32 patients in study group are given comprehensive care and 32 patients in control group are given conventional care and then compare clinical effects between two groups.Results Patients’ nursing efficacy in study group is much higher than that in control group (P<0.05); there is a big differential between two groups.Conclusion Comprehensive care is of efficacy on patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; such an effective method is quite worthwhile to be promoted widespread.
