长江科学院院报
長江科學院院報
장강과학원원보
Journal of Yangtze River Scientific Research Institute
2015年
10期
96-100
,共5页
岩质斜坡%破坏机制%地震作用%非贯通节理%数值模拟%位移时程曲线
巖質斜坡%破壞機製%地震作用%非貫通節理%數值模擬%位移時程麯線
암질사파%파배궤제%지진작용%비관통절리%수치모의%위이시정곡선
rock slope%failure mechanism%earthquake action%intermittent joints%numerical simulation%time-his-tory curve of displacement
以地震作用下的非贯通节理岩质斜坡为研究对象,利用大型有限元软件 ANSYS 建立数值模型。数值模拟结果表明:地震作用下非贯通节理岩质斜坡的稳定系数受结构面的长度、密度、贯通率、展布方向等因素影响;节理面的位移放大效应和变形积累效应明显;岩桥的破坏在地震初期比较剧烈,之后在地震作用下继续发生破坏,在经过地震波波幅较大的波段后,斜坡的变形破坏才稳定下来;地震作用下,岩桥内部应力波动剧烈,拉剪共同作用导致了岩桥的最终破坏;层间节理位移和层间摩擦应力分布很不均匀,不同位置的节理的动力响应也有较大不同。
以地震作用下的非貫通節理巖質斜坡為研究對象,利用大型有限元軟件 ANSYS 建立數值模型。數值模擬結果錶明:地震作用下非貫通節理巖質斜坡的穩定繫數受結構麵的長度、密度、貫通率、展佈方嚮等因素影響;節理麵的位移放大效應和變形積纍效應明顯;巖橋的破壞在地震初期比較劇烈,之後在地震作用下繼續髮生破壞,在經過地震波波幅較大的波段後,斜坡的變形破壞纔穩定下來;地震作用下,巖橋內部應力波動劇烈,拉剪共同作用導緻瞭巖橋的最終破壞;層間節理位移和層間摩抆應力分佈很不均勻,不同位置的節理的動力響應也有較大不同。
이지진작용하적비관통절리암질사파위연구대상,이용대형유한원연건 ANSYS 건립수치모형。수치모의결과표명:지진작용하비관통절리암질사파적은정계수수결구면적장도、밀도、관통솔、전포방향등인소영향;절리면적위이방대효응화변형적루효응명현;암교적파배재지진초기비교극렬,지후재지진작용하계속발생파배,재경과지진파파폭교대적파단후,사파적변형파배재은정하래;지진작용하,암교내부응력파동극렬,랍전공동작용도치료암교적최종파배;층간절리위이화층간마찰응력분포흔불균균,불동위치적절리적동력향응야유교대불동。
Finite element software ANSYS was used to establish a numerical model to research the rock slope contai-ning intermittent joints under earthquake.Numerical simulation results showed that:under earthquake action,the stability coefficient of rock slope with intermittent joints was influenced by the length density,rate of connectivity, spreading directions of structural planes;the displacement amplification effect and deformation accumulation effect of joint surface were obvious.In the early stage of earthquake action,the damage of rock bridges was very violent, and then the damage continued under earthquake.The deformation and failure of slope stabilized until after large amplitude band.Moreover,the internal stress of the rock bridges fluctuated remarkably under earthquake,and the tension action and shearing action together led to the final failure of the non-coalescence regions;the contact sliding distance and frictional stress between layers distributed very unevenly,and the dynamic response of joints at differ-ent positions were quite different.