齐齐哈尔医学院学报
齊齊哈爾醫學院學報
제제합이의학원학보
Journal of Qiqihar University of Medicine
2015年
28期
4240-4242
,共3页
外敷中药%针灸%按摩和理疗%膝关节炎%治疗效果
外敷中藥%針灸%按摩和理療%膝關節炎%治療效果
외부중약%침구%안마화리료%슬관절염%치료효과
Topical medicine%Acupuncture%Massage and physiotherapy%Knee arthritis%Treatment effect
目的：探讨外敷中药联合针灸、按摩和理疗在膝关节炎患者中的临床治疗效果。方法对我院收治的80例膝关节炎患者资料进行分析，根据不同治疗方案将患者分为对照组和实验组，对照组采用针灸、按摩联合理疗治疗，实验组在对照组基础上联合外敷中药治疗，比较两组疗效。结果实验组95％对治疗方案疗效显著，明显优于对照组（疗效有效率为85％）（P＜0．05）；实验组95％对方案疗效满意，显著高于对照组（满意率达到65％）（P＜0．05）；实验组ADL评分为（16．2±3．7）分，膝关节功能评分为（59．6±7．5）分，心理功能评分为（65．8±9．2）分，社会功能评分为（57．2±6．5）分，均高于对照组（P＜0．05）；实验组关节疼痛指数为（8．6±0．5）分，关节肿胀指数为（9．0±0．25）分，低于对照组（P＜0．05）；实验组关节活动指数为（9．4±0．1）分，高于对照组（ P＜0．05）。结论膝关节炎患者采用外敷中药联合针灸、按摩和理疗效果理想，值得推广使用。
目的：探討外敷中藥聯閤針灸、按摩和理療在膝關節炎患者中的臨床治療效果。方法對我院收治的80例膝關節炎患者資料進行分析，根據不同治療方案將患者分為對照組和實驗組，對照組採用針灸、按摩聯閤理療治療，實驗組在對照組基礎上聯閤外敷中藥治療，比較兩組療效。結果實驗組95％對治療方案療效顯著，明顯優于對照組（療效有效率為85％）（P＜0．05）；實驗組95％對方案療效滿意，顯著高于對照組（滿意率達到65％）（P＜0．05）；實驗組ADL評分為（16．2±3．7）分，膝關節功能評分為（59．6±7．5）分，心理功能評分為（65．8±9．2）分，社會功能評分為（57．2±6．5）分，均高于對照組（P＜0．05）；實驗組關節疼痛指數為（8．6±0．5）分，關節腫脹指數為（9．0±0．25）分，低于對照組（P＜0．05）；實驗組關節活動指數為（9．4±0．1）分，高于對照組（ P＜0．05）。結論膝關節炎患者採用外敷中藥聯閤針灸、按摩和理療效果理想，值得推廣使用。
목적：탐토외부중약연합침구、안마화리료재슬관절염환자중적림상치료효과。방법대아원수치적80례슬관절염환자자료진행분석，근거불동치료방안장환자분위대조조화실험조，대조조채용침구、안마연합리료치료，실험조재대조조기출상연합외부중약치료，비교량조료효。결과실험조95％대치료방안료효현저，명현우우대조조（료효유효솔위85％）（P＜0．05）；실험조95％대방안료효만의，현저고우대조조（만의솔체도65％）（P＜0．05）；실험조ADL평분위（16．2±3．7）분，슬관절공능평분위（59．6±7．5）분，심리공능평분위（65．8±9．2）분，사회공능평분위（57．2±6．5）분，균고우대조조（P＜0．05）；실험조관절동통지수위（8．6±0．5）분，관절종창지수위（9．0±0．25）분，저우대조조（P＜0．05）；실험조관절활동지수위（9．4±0．1）분，고우대조조（ P＜0．05）。결론슬관절염환자채용외부중약연합침구、안마화리료효과이상，치득추엄사용。
Objective To investigate the topical medicine combined with acupuncture, massage and physiotherapy clinical outcomes in patients with osteoarthritis of the knee.Methods 80 patients with osteoarthritis of the knee in patients admitted to our hospital for analysis, according to the different treatment regimens were divided into a control group and the experimental group and the control group received acupuncture, massage therapy combined therapy, and topical joint experimental group on the basis of the control group Chinese medicine treatment, comparing the two groups.Results 95%of the experimental group therapy a significant effect, significantly better than the control group (efficacy rate was 85%) (P<0.05);95% of the experimental group satisfaction program efficacy was significantly higher (satisfaction rate of 65%) (P<0.05);ADL scores for the experimental group (16.2 ±3.7) points, knee function score was (59.6 ±7.5) points, psychological function score was (65.8 ±9.2) points, social function score was (57.2 ±6.5) points, were higher (P<0.05);joint pain index for the experimental group (8.6 ±0.5) points, joint swelling index (9.0 ±0.25) points lower than the control group (P<0.05); experiments group joint activity index (9.4 ±0.1) points, higher than (P<0.05).Conclusions Patients with osteoarthritis of the knee joint used topical medicine acupuncture, massage that had ideal physical therapy effect, should be introduced.
