中国医学教育技术
中國醫學教育技術
중국의학교육기술
China Medical Education Technology
2015年
5期
583-585
,共3页
马小斌%宋雅%康华峰%代志军%惠文涛%管海涛%王西京
馬小斌%宋雅%康華峰%代誌軍%惠文濤%管海濤%王西京
마소빈%송아%강화봉%대지군%혜문도%관해도%왕서경
PBL%MDT%临床教学
PBL%MDT%臨床教學
PBL%MDT%림상교학
PBL%MDT%clinical teaching
目的：探讨乳腺癌临床教学中应用 PBL 联合 MDT 模式的教学效果。方法选取西安交通大学2008及2009级临床医学专业来我院进行乳腺癌临床实习学生共165名，随机按班级分为对照组（传统教学 LBL 组）和实验组（PBL 联合 MDT 组），分别按照各组教学方式进行乳腺癌临床实习教学，比较二组教学效果及教学满意度的差别。结果①PBL 联合 MDT 组理论成绩与对照组差异无统计学意义（41．08±3．12 vs 40．58±2．97 P ＞0．05），但病例综合分析成绩实验组高于对照组，差异有统计学意义（42．32±3．52 vs 40．33±2．88 P ＜0．01）；②调查分析显示 PBL 联合 MDT 组学生满意度高于对照组，差异具有统计学意义（P ＜0．05）。结论PBL 联合 MDT 模式在乳腺癌临床教学中效果明显，安全性良好，符合现代乳腺癌诊治理念，值得推广。
目的：探討乳腺癌臨床教學中應用 PBL 聯閤 MDT 模式的教學效果。方法選取西安交通大學2008及2009級臨床醫學專業來我院進行乳腺癌臨床實習學生共165名，隨機按班級分為對照組（傳統教學 LBL 組）和實驗組（PBL 聯閤 MDT 組），分彆按照各組教學方式進行乳腺癌臨床實習教學，比較二組教學效果及教學滿意度的差彆。結果①PBL 聯閤 MDT 組理論成績與對照組差異無統計學意義（41．08±3．12 vs 40．58±2．97 P ＞0．05），但病例綜閤分析成績實驗組高于對照組，差異有統計學意義（42．32±3．52 vs 40．33±2．88 P ＜0．01）；②調查分析顯示 PBL 聯閤 MDT 組學生滿意度高于對照組，差異具有統計學意義（P ＜0．05）。結論PBL 聯閤 MDT 模式在乳腺癌臨床教學中效果明顯，安全性良好，符閤現代乳腺癌診治理唸，值得推廣。
목적：탐토유선암림상교학중응용 PBL 연합 MDT 모식적교학효과。방법선취서안교통대학2008급2009급림상의학전업래아원진행유선암림상실습학생공165명，수궤안반급분위대조조（전통교학 LBL 조）화실험조（PBL 연합 MDT 조），분별안조각조교학방식진행유선암림상실습교학，비교이조교학효과급교학만의도적차별。결과①PBL 연합 MDT 조이론성적여대조조차이무통계학의의（41．08±3．12 vs 40．58±2．97 P ＞0．05），단병례종합분석성적실험조고우대조조，차이유통계학의의（42．32±3．52 vs 40．33±2．88 P ＜0．01）；②조사분석현시 PBL 연합 MDT 조학생만의도고우대조조，차이구유통계학의의（P ＜0．05）。결론PBL 연합 MDT 모식재유선암림상교학중효과명현，안전성량호，부합현대유선암진치이념，치득추엄。
Objective To explore the teaching effect of application of PBL combined with MDT pattern in clinical teaching of breast cancer.Methods We selected 165 XJTU clinical medicine specialty students of Grade 2008 and 2009 who were in our hospital for breast cancer clinical practice.Then we randomly divided them into control group (the traditional teaching group,LBL group)and experimental group (PBL +MDT group)according to their classes.Each group received training of clinical breast cancer respectively according to the corresponding teaching method.We compared the teaching effects and students'satisfaction about teaching in the two groups.Results ①The theoretical test results in PBL+MDT group did not significantly differ from those in the control group (41.08 ±3.12 vs.40.58 ± 2.97,P >0.05).However,the experimental group significantly outperformed the control group in score of comprehensive case analysis (42.32 ±3.52 vs.40.33 ±2.88,P <0.01 ).②Investigation and analysis showed that the students in the experimental group had significantly greater satisfaction than those in the control group (P <0.05 ).Conclusion PBL combined with MDT pattern applied in clinical teaching of breast cancer has obvious effects and good safety,and suits the modern concept of diagnosis and treatment of breast cancer.Therefore,it is worth popularizing.
