现代肿瘤医学
現代腫瘤醫學
현대종류의학
Journal of Modern Oncology
2015年
23期
3442-3445
,共4页
吉西他滨%紫杉醇%多西他赛%卡培他滨%复发转移性乳腺癌
吉西他濱%紫杉醇%多西他賽%卡培他濱%複髮轉移性乳腺癌
길서타빈%자삼순%다서타새%잡배타빈%복발전이성유선암
gemcitabine%taxol%docetaxel%xeloda%recurrent and metastatic breast cancer
目的:观察吉西他滨联合紫杉醇(GT)及卡培他滨联合多西他赛(XT)方案治疗复发转移性乳腺癌的临床疗效及毒副反应。方法:复发转移性乳腺癌患者36例,采用回顾性研究方法分为两组:GT 组18人,第1天紫杉醇175mg/ m2静滴3小时,第1、8天吉西他滨1000mg/ m2静滴30分钟,21天为一周期;XT 组18人,第1天多西他赛75mg/ m2静滴1小时,第1~14天卡培他滨1000mg/ m2口服 Bid,周期同为21天。化疗期间观察患者化疗毒副反应,每两周期行影像学检查评价疗效。结果:GT 组 CR 为11.1%,PR 为38.9%,SD 为27.8%,DCR 为77.8%;XT 组 CR 为5.6%,PR 为44.4%,SD 为22.2%,DCR 为72.2%,两组对比无统计学差异(P >0.05)。GT 组中位 TTP 为8.7个月,XT 组中位 TTP 为7.8个月,两者统计学上无差异(P >0.05)。毒副反应方面 GT 组血小板减少发生率较 XT 组高,XT 组手足综合征发生率高于 GT 组,其余各项无显著性差异(P >0.05)。结论:GT 方案与 XT 方案治疗复发转移性乳腺癌疗效确切,毒副反应能耐受。
目的:觀察吉西他濱聯閤紫杉醇(GT)及卡培他濱聯閤多西他賽(XT)方案治療複髮轉移性乳腺癌的臨床療效及毒副反應。方法:複髮轉移性乳腺癌患者36例,採用迴顧性研究方法分為兩組:GT 組18人,第1天紫杉醇175mg/ m2靜滴3小時,第1、8天吉西他濱1000mg/ m2靜滴30分鐘,21天為一週期;XT 組18人,第1天多西他賽75mg/ m2靜滴1小時,第1~14天卡培他濱1000mg/ m2口服 Bid,週期同為21天。化療期間觀察患者化療毒副反應,每兩週期行影像學檢查評價療效。結果:GT 組 CR 為11.1%,PR 為38.9%,SD 為27.8%,DCR 為77.8%;XT 組 CR 為5.6%,PR 為44.4%,SD 為22.2%,DCR 為72.2%,兩組對比無統計學差異(P >0.05)。GT 組中位 TTP 為8.7箇月,XT 組中位 TTP 為7.8箇月,兩者統計學上無差異(P >0.05)。毒副反應方麵 GT 組血小闆減少髮生率較 XT 組高,XT 組手足綜閤徵髮生率高于 GT 組,其餘各項無顯著性差異(P >0.05)。結論:GT 方案與 XT 方案治療複髮轉移性乳腺癌療效確切,毒副反應能耐受。
목적:관찰길서타빈연합자삼순(GT)급잡배타빈연합다서타새(XT)방안치료복발전이성유선암적림상료효급독부반응。방법:복발전이성유선암환자36례,채용회고성연구방법분위량조:GT 조18인,제1천자삼순175mg/ m2정적3소시,제1、8천길서타빈1000mg/ m2정적30분종,21천위일주기;XT 조18인,제1천다서타새75mg/ m2정적1소시,제1~14천잡배타빈1000mg/ m2구복 Bid,주기동위21천。화료기간관찰환자화료독부반응,매량주기행영상학검사평개료효。결과:GT 조 CR 위11.1%,PR 위38.9%,SD 위27.8%,DCR 위77.8%;XT 조 CR 위5.6%,PR 위44.4%,SD 위22.2%,DCR 위72.2%,량조대비무통계학차이(P >0.05)。GT 조중위 TTP 위8.7개월,XT 조중위 TTP 위7.8개월,량자통계학상무차이(P >0.05)。독부반응방면 GT 조혈소판감소발생솔교 XT 조고,XT 조수족종합정발생솔고우 GT 조,기여각항무현저성차이(P >0.05)。결론:GT 방안여 XT 방안치료복발전이성유선암료효학절,독부반응능내수。
Objective:To study the clinical curative effect and adverse of gemcitabine plus taxol(GT)and xeloda plus docetaxel(XT)in recurrent and metastatic breast cancer. Methods:Using retrospective study,36 cases of recur-rent and metastatic breast cancer were divided into two groups. The 18 patients in the GT group received the GT chemotherapy regimen(taxol 175mg/ m2 on the 1st day;gemcitabine 1 000mg/ m2 on the 1st day and 8th day;and 21 days for a cycle. The 18 patients in the XT group received the chemotherapy regimen:docetaxel 75mg/ m2 on the 1st day;Capecitabine orally 2 000mg/(m2 ·d),twice a day from the 1st day to 14th day;and 21 days for a cycle. Re-sults:In GT group,2 patients achieved complete response( CR),7 patients achieved partial remission( PR),5 patients achieved stable disease( SD),and the response rate was about 77. 8% . In XT group,1 patient achieved complete response(CR),8 patients achieved partial remission(PR),4 patients achieved stable disease(SD),and the response rate was 72. 2% . There was no statistically significant differrence between two groups(P > 0. 05). The median TTP of GT group was 8. 7 months,while XT group median TTP was 7. 8 months,without any difference statisti-cally. There was higher incidence of thrombocytopenia in GT group than XT group,and incidence of extremities syn-drome in XT group was higher than GT group. Conclusion:The curative effect of GT and XT regimens in treating re-current and metastatic breast cancer is obvious and the toxicities can be tolerated.