中华麻醉学杂志
中華痳醉學雜誌
중화마취학잡지
Chinese Journal of Anesthesiology
2015年
7期
855-857
,共3页
施乙飞%韩建阁%刘超%翟文倩%耳建旭
施乙飛%韓建閣%劉超%翟文倩%耳建旭
시을비%한건각%류초%적문천%이건욱
二异丙酚%舒芬太尼%麻醉药,吸入%心肺转流术%脑损伤
二異丙酚%舒芬太尼%痳醉藥,吸入%心肺轉流術%腦損傷
이이병분%서분태니%마취약,흡입%심폐전류술%뇌손상
Propofol%Sufentanil%Anesthetics,inhalation%Cardiopulmonary bypass%Brain injuries
目的 比较丙泊酚或七氟醚复合舒芬太尼麻醉对CPB下瓣膜手术患者的脑保护效应.方法 择期CPB下行瓣膜手术患者60例,年龄60~ 70岁,ASA分级Ⅱ或Ⅲ级.采用随机数字表法分为丙泊酚复合麻醉组(PA组)和七氟醚复合麻醉组(SA组),每组30例.自麻醉诱导至术毕PA组持续靶控输注丙泊酚0.5~ 2.0 μg/ml;SA组持续吸入0.5%~2.5%七氟醚,维持BIS值45 ~ 55.分别于麻醉诱导后即刻(T0)、术毕(T1)、术后6、12和24 h(T2-4)时上腔静脉逆行置管抽取血样,采用ELISA法测定血浆S-100β蛋白和神经元特异性烯醇化酶(NSE)的浓度.结果 与SA组比较,PA组T12时血浆S-100β蛋白浓度、T1-3时NSE浓度降低(P<0.05).结论 丙泊酚复合舒芬太尼麻醉对CPB下瓣膜手术患者的脑保护效应优于七氟醚复合舒芬太尼麻醉.
目的 比較丙泊酚或七氟醚複閤舒芬太尼痳醉對CPB下瓣膜手術患者的腦保護效應.方法 擇期CPB下行瓣膜手術患者60例,年齡60~ 70歲,ASA分級Ⅱ或Ⅲ級.採用隨機數字錶法分為丙泊酚複閤痳醉組(PA組)和七氟醚複閤痳醉組(SA組),每組30例.自痳醉誘導至術畢PA組持續靶控輸註丙泊酚0.5~ 2.0 μg/ml;SA組持續吸入0.5%~2.5%七氟醚,維持BIS值45 ~ 55.分彆于痳醉誘導後即刻(T0)、術畢(T1)、術後6、12和24 h(T2-4)時上腔靜脈逆行置管抽取血樣,採用ELISA法測定血漿S-100β蛋白和神經元特異性烯醇化酶(NSE)的濃度.結果 與SA組比較,PA組T12時血漿S-100β蛋白濃度、T1-3時NSE濃度降低(P<0.05).結論 丙泊酚複閤舒芬太尼痳醉對CPB下瓣膜手術患者的腦保護效應優于七氟醚複閤舒芬太尼痳醉.
목적 비교병박분혹칠불미복합서분태니마취대CPB하판막수술환자적뇌보호효응.방법 택기CPB하행판막수술환자60례,년령60~ 70세,ASA분급Ⅱ혹Ⅲ급.채용수궤수자표법분위병박분복합마취조(PA조)화칠불미복합마취조(SA조),매조30례.자마취유도지술필PA조지속파공수주병박분0.5~ 2.0 μg/ml;SA조지속흡입0.5%~2.5%칠불미,유지BIS치45 ~ 55.분별우마취유도후즉각(T0)、술필(T1)、술후6、12화24 h(T2-4)시상강정맥역행치관추취혈양,채용ELISA법측정혈장S-100β단백화신경원특이성희순화매(NSE)적농도.결과 여SA조비교,PA조T12시혈장S-100β단백농도、T1-3시NSE농도강저(P<0.05).결론 병박분복합서분태니마취대CPB하판막수술환자적뇌보호효응우우칠불미복합서분태니마취.
Objective To compare the cerebral protective effect of propofol and sevoflurane combined with sufentanil anesthesia in the patients undergoing valvular surgery under cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB).Methods Sixty American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status Ⅱ or Ⅲ patients, aged 60-70 yr, scheduled for elective valvular surgery under CPB, were randomly divided into either propofol-based anesthesia group (group PA) or sevoflurane-based anesthesia group (group SA) , with 30 patients in each group.From induction of anesthesia to the end of surgery, group P received targetcontrolled infusion of propofol 0.5-2.0 μg/ml, and group S continuously inhaled 0.5%-2.5% sevoflurane.Bispectral index value was maintained at 45-55.Immediately after induction (T0), at the end of surgery (T1) , and at 6, 12 and 24 h after surgery (T2-4) , the superior vena cava was retrogradely cannulated for blood sampling, and the concentrations of plasma S-100β protein and neuron-specific enzyme were determined using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay.Results Compared with group SA, the plasma S-100β concentrations at T1,2 and neuron-specific enzyme concentrations at T1-3 were significantly decreased in group PA.Conclusion The cerebral protective effect of propofol combined with sufentanil anesthesia is superior to that of sevoflurane combined with sufentanil anesthesia in the patients undergoing valvular surgery under CPB.