国际眼科杂志
國際眼科雜誌
국제안과잡지
International Eye Science
2015年
11期
1942-1944
,共3页
丁国鹏%丁国龙%雷姝%单武强%谢桂军%丁晓琚
丁國鵬%丁國龍%雷姝%單武彊%謝桂軍%丁曉琚
정국붕%정국룡%뢰주%단무강%사계군%정효거
康柏西普%微脉冲激光%黄斑中心厚度%最佳矫正视力
康柏西普%微脈遲激光%黃斑中心厚度%最佳矯正視力
강백서보%미맥충격광%황반중심후도%최가교정시력
Conbercept%micro- pulse laser%central macular thickness%the best corrected visual acuity
目的:探讨玻璃体腔内注射康柏西普联合577 nm微脉冲激光治疗糖尿病性黄斑水肿( diabetic macular edema, DME)的临床疗效。方法:回顾性研究。选取2014-06/12在宝鸡市人民医院眼科经眼底检查、眼底荧光素血管造影( fluorescein fundus angiography, FFA )及光学相干断层扫描( optical coherence tomography,OCT)检查确诊的DME患者64例64眼,按所采用治疗方法不同分为试验组和对照组各32例。试验组给予玻璃体腔内注射康柏西普联合577 nm微脉冲激光治疗;对照组给予577 nm微脉冲激光治疗,对比分析两组患者治疗前后最佳矫正视力( best corrected visual acuity, BCVA )和黄斑中心厚度( central macular thickness,CMT)的变化。结果:对两组患者BCVA和CMT分别采用两因素重复测量方差分析结果表明,两组BCVA和CMT在组间的处理效应与时间效应的交互作用均有明显统计学意义(F=46.92,P<0.01;F=60.231,P<0.01),处理主效应也均有明显统计学意义( F=12.16, P<0.01;F=8.983, P<0.01),两种治疗方法的疗效有明显的差异,试验组的BCVA和CMT指标优于对照组。时间主效应有明显统计学意义(F=116.14,P<0.01;F=397.376,P<0.01), BCVA均数随治疗时间延长而增加, CMT均数随治疗时间延长而减少。结论:玻璃体腔内注射康柏西普联合577 nm微脉冲激光在治疗DME上,减轻黄斑水肿、提高患者视力方面效果更优于单纯微脉冲光凝治疗。
目的:探討玻璃體腔內註射康柏西普聯閤577 nm微脈遲激光治療糖尿病性黃斑水腫( diabetic macular edema, DME)的臨床療效。方法:迴顧性研究。選取2014-06/12在寶鷄市人民醫院眼科經眼底檢查、眼底熒光素血管造影( fluorescein fundus angiography, FFA )及光學相榦斷層掃描( optical coherence tomography,OCT)檢查確診的DME患者64例64眼,按所採用治療方法不同分為試驗組和對照組各32例。試驗組給予玻璃體腔內註射康柏西普聯閤577 nm微脈遲激光治療;對照組給予577 nm微脈遲激光治療,對比分析兩組患者治療前後最佳矯正視力( best corrected visual acuity, BCVA )和黃斑中心厚度( central macular thickness,CMT)的變化。結果:對兩組患者BCVA和CMT分彆採用兩因素重複測量方差分析結果錶明,兩組BCVA和CMT在組間的處理效應與時間效應的交互作用均有明顯統計學意義(F=46.92,P<0.01;F=60.231,P<0.01),處理主效應也均有明顯統計學意義( F=12.16, P<0.01;F=8.983, P<0.01),兩種治療方法的療效有明顯的差異,試驗組的BCVA和CMT指標優于對照組。時間主效應有明顯統計學意義(F=116.14,P<0.01;F=397.376,P<0.01), BCVA均數隨治療時間延長而增加, CMT均數隨治療時間延長而減少。結論:玻璃體腔內註射康柏西普聯閤577 nm微脈遲激光在治療DME上,減輕黃斑水腫、提高患者視力方麵效果更優于單純微脈遲光凝治療。
목적:탐토파리체강내주사강백서보연합577 nm미맥충격광치료당뇨병성황반수종( diabetic macular edema, DME)적림상료효。방법:회고성연구。선취2014-06/12재보계시인민의원안과경안저검사、안저형광소혈관조영( fluorescein fundus angiography, FFA )급광학상간단층소묘( optical coherence tomography,OCT)검사학진적DME환자64례64안,안소채용치료방법불동분위시험조화대조조각32례。시험조급여파리체강내주사강백서보연합577 nm미맥충격광치료;대조조급여577 nm미맥충격광치료,대비분석량조환자치료전후최가교정시력( best corrected visual acuity, BCVA )화황반중심후도( central macular thickness,CMT)적변화。결과:대량조환자BCVA화CMT분별채용량인소중복측량방차분석결과표명,량조BCVA화CMT재조간적처리효응여시간효응적교호작용균유명현통계학의의(F=46.92,P<0.01;F=60.231,P<0.01),처리주효응야균유명현통계학의의( F=12.16, P<0.01;F=8.983, P<0.01),량충치료방법적료효유명현적차이,시험조적BCVA화CMT지표우우대조조。시간주효응유명현통계학의의(F=116.14,P<0.01;F=397.376,P<0.01), BCVA균수수치료시간연장이증가, CMT균수수치료시간연장이감소。결론:파리체강내주사강백서보연합577 nm미맥충격광재치료DME상,감경황반수종、제고환자시력방면효과경우우단순미맥충광응치료。
Abstract?AlM:To investigate the clinical effect of Conbercept intravitreal injection combined with 577nm micro-pulse laser on the treatment of diabetic macular edema( DME) .?METHODS:From June to December in 2014, after the diagnosis was confirmed by fundus examination, fundus fluorescein angiography ( FFA ) and optical coherence tomography ( OCT ) , 64 patients ( 64 eyes ) from department of ophthalmology in Baoji People’s Hospital with DME were randomly divided into experiment group (32 cases)and control group(32 cases). The experiment group received 577nm micro-pulse laser combined with intravitreal injection of Conbercept. The control group was treated with 577nm micro-pulse laser. The best corrected visual acuity ( BCVA ) and central macular thickness ( CMT ) of two groups before and after treatments were compared.?RESULTS:The ANOVA for two-way repeated measures was used to analyze the data of BCVA and CMT between two groups. The results showed that the interaction between treatment effects and time effects in BCVA and CMT was significant(F=46. 92,P<0. 01;F=60. 231,P<0. 01), the main effect of the treatment were significant(F=12. 16,P<0. 01;F=8. 983,P<0. 01). There was significant difference on the effect between the two treatments, BCVA and CMT of experiment group were better than those of control group. The main time effect was statistically significant (F=116. 14,P<0. 01;F=397. 376,P<0. 01) . The BCVA means increased with the treatment time, but the CMT means decreased.? CONCLUSlON: lntravitreal injection of Conbercept combined with 577nm micropulse laser on the treatment of DME was much better on reducing macular edema and improving visual acuity than the micro - pulse treatment.