CAJ | 학술논문

目的：比较微管人工流产术与传统人工流产术的临床疗效。方法选取2014年6月~12月我科门诊收治的162例要求终止妊娠的患者为研究对象，根据手术方法的不同分为微管组和传统组，其中微管组(83例)行微管人工流产术，传统组(79例)行传统负压吸宫术。比较两组患者的流产成功率、术中出血量、手术时间、术后出血时间。结果微创组流产成功率96.39%，传统组流产成功率为93.67%，(﹥0.05)；微创组患者手术时间、术中出血量、术后出血时间均少于传统组，差异均具有统计学意义(﹤0.01)。结论微管人工流产术的临床疗效优于传统人工流产术。
목적：비교미관인공유산술여전통인공유산술적림상료효。방법선취2014년6월~12월아과문진수치적162례요구종지임신적환자위연구대상，근거수술방법적불동분위미관조화전통조，기중미관조(83례)행미관인공유산술，전통조(79례)행전통부압흡궁술。비교량조환자적유산성공솔、술중출혈량、수술시간、술후출혈시간。결과미창조유산성공솔96.39%，전통조유산성공솔위93.67%，(﹥0.05)；미창조환자수술시간、술중출혈량、술후출혈시간균소우전통조，차이균구유통계학의의(﹤0.01)。결론미관인공유산술적림상료효우우전통인공유산술。
Objective To compare the clinical ef icacy of microtubules abortion and traditional abortion.Methods 162 cases of terminate the pregnancy were the research object form June 2014 to December 2014 in our hospital.According to the dif erent treatment methods the cases were divided into the microtubule group and traditional group,microtubule group (83 cases)used fold microtubule abortion,the traditional group (79 cases)used fold traditional underwent vacuum aspiration.The successful rate of abortion,bleeding volume of intraoperative,time of operation time and the bleeding time after operation were compared in two groups.Results The success rate of abortion of microtubules group was 96.39%,the success rate of abortion of traditional group was 93.67%,( ﹥0.05).The bleeding volume of intraoperative,time of operation time and the bleeding time after operation of microtubule group was significantly shorter than the traditional group,the dif erences were statistical y significant ( ﹤0.01).Conclusion The clinical curative ef ect of microtubules abortion is bet er than the traditional abortion.