无损检测
無損檢測
무손검측
Nondestructive Testing
2015年
11期
68-72
,共5页
靳聪%史亦韦%卢超%梁菁%王晓%赵莉
靳聰%史亦韋%盧超%樑菁%王曉%趙莉
근총%사역위%로초%량정%왕효%조리
铝合金预拉伸板%临界折射纵波%超声%应力
鋁閤金預拉伸闆%臨界摺射縱波%超聲%應力
려합금예랍신판%림계절사종파%초성%응력
Pre-stretched aluminum alloy plate%Critically refracted longitudinal (LCR)wave%Ultrasonic%Stress
探讨了与应力方向成不同角度传播的超声临界折射纵波速度与应力的关系,并利用这一关系对铝合金预拉伸板的残余应力进行了测量,最后对此方法的应力测量结果与钻孔法的测量结果进行了对比。结果表明:随应力增加,沿平行于应力方向传播的临界折射纵波速度减小,而沿垂直于应力方向传播的临界折射纵波速度变化不大,因此临界折射纵波仅对沿其传播方向上的应力分量敏感,可利用其测量特定方向上的应力分量。利用钻孔法对超声应力测量结果进行了验证,得出二者的测量结果在应力分布趋势上具有较好的一致性,两种方法获得的绝对残余应力值的差异是由于其测量范围不同所造成的。
探討瞭與應力方嚮成不同角度傳播的超聲臨界摺射縱波速度與應力的關繫,併利用這一關繫對鋁閤金預拉伸闆的殘餘應力進行瞭測量,最後對此方法的應力測量結果與鑽孔法的測量結果進行瞭對比。結果錶明:隨應力增加,沿平行于應力方嚮傳播的臨界摺射縱波速度減小,而沿垂直于應力方嚮傳播的臨界摺射縱波速度變化不大,因此臨界摺射縱波僅對沿其傳播方嚮上的應力分量敏感,可利用其測量特定方嚮上的應力分量。利用鑽孔法對超聲應力測量結果進行瞭驗證,得齣二者的測量結果在應力分佈趨勢上具有較好的一緻性,兩種方法穫得的絕對殘餘應力值的差異是由于其測量範圍不同所造成的。
탐토료여응력방향성불동각도전파적초성림계절사종파속도여응력적관계,병이용저일관계대려합금예랍신판적잔여응력진행료측량,최후대차방법적응력측량결과여찬공법적측량결과진행료대비。결과표명:수응력증가,연평행우응력방향전파적림계절사종파속도감소,이연수직우응력방향전파적림계절사종파속도변화불대,인차림계절사종파부대연기전파방향상적응력분량민감,가이용기측량특정방향상적응력분량。이용찬공법대초성응력측량결과진행료험증,득출이자적측량결과재응력분포추세상구유교호적일치성,량충방법획득적절대잔여응력치적차이시유우기측량범위불동소조성적。
The relationship between velocity of ultrasonic critically refracted longitudinal (LCR ) wave propagating along different angles with respect to the stress direction and stress was studied in this paper.Besides, the residual stress in pre-stretched aluminum alloy plate was measured by using this relation.Finally,the result of stress measurement by using this method was compared to that of using hole drilling method.The experimental results show that velocity of LCR wave propagating parallel to the stress orientation decreases and velocity of LCR wave propagating perpendicular to the stress direction has hardly changes with the gradually increasing applied stress,therefore LCR wave is only sensitive to stress component along its propagation direction and stress component at specific direction can be measured by using LCR wave.The results of stress measurement by using ultrasonic was verified by using hole drilling method and the result shows that the results of measurement using those two methods have a relatively good consistency in the trend of stress distribution.The difference of the absolute value of residual stress by using those two methods is caused by the difference of their measuring range.