新疆医科大学学报
新疆醫科大學學報
신강의과대학학보
Journal of Xinjiang Medical University
2015年
11期
1417-1419
,共3页
邢艳%帕提曼·阿不都热依木%潘存雪%刘文亚
邢豔%帕提曼·阿不都熱依木%潘存雪%劉文亞
형염%파제만·아불도열의목%반존설%류문아
冠状动脉%冠状动脉狭窄%计算机体层摄影
冠狀動脈%冠狀動脈狹窄%計算機體層攝影
관상동맥%관상동맥협착%계산궤체층섭영
coronary artery%coronary stenosis%computed tomography
目的:探讨64层 CT 冠状动脉造影对冠状动脉的可诊断率及诊断冠心病的价值。方法选择连续行64层 CT 冠状动脉造影的可疑冠心病患者80例,患者同期行冠状动脉造影检查,评价 CT 冠脉造影对冠心病的诊断价值。结果以患者为评价标准,64层 CT 的可诊断率为98.75%;以冠状动脉主要分支为评价标准,可诊断率为96.88%;以冠状动脉节段为评价标准,可诊断率为97.25%。基于患者64层螺旋 CT 冠状动脉造影诊断冠心病的敏感性为97.92%,特异性为90.32%,阴性预测值为96.55%,阳性预测值为94.00%;基于冠状动脉主要分支的敏感性为92.13%,特异性为95.93%,阴性预测值为96.80%,阳性预测值为90.11%;基于冠状动脉节段的敏感性为90.74%,特异性为98.87%,阴性预测值为99.05%,阳性预测值为89.09%。结论MSCT 冠状动脉造影可以可靠地评价冠状动脉狭窄,能够作为筛查冠心病的无创性检查方法。
目的:探討64層 CT 冠狀動脈造影對冠狀動脈的可診斷率及診斷冠心病的價值。方法選擇連續行64層 CT 冠狀動脈造影的可疑冠心病患者80例,患者同期行冠狀動脈造影檢查,評價 CT 冠脈造影對冠心病的診斷價值。結果以患者為評價標準,64層 CT 的可診斷率為98.75%;以冠狀動脈主要分支為評價標準,可診斷率為96.88%;以冠狀動脈節段為評價標準,可診斷率為97.25%。基于患者64層螺鏇 CT 冠狀動脈造影診斷冠心病的敏感性為97.92%,特異性為90.32%,陰性預測值為96.55%,暘性預測值為94.00%;基于冠狀動脈主要分支的敏感性為92.13%,特異性為95.93%,陰性預測值為96.80%,暘性預測值為90.11%;基于冠狀動脈節段的敏感性為90.74%,特異性為98.87%,陰性預測值為99.05%,暘性預測值為89.09%。結論MSCT 冠狀動脈造影可以可靠地評價冠狀動脈狹窄,能夠作為篩查冠心病的無創性檢查方法。
목적:탐토64층 CT 관상동맥조영대관상동맥적가진단솔급진단관심병적개치。방법선택련속행64층 CT 관상동맥조영적가의관심병환자80례,환자동기행관상동맥조영검사,평개 CT 관맥조영대관심병적진단개치。결과이환자위평개표준,64층 CT 적가진단솔위98.75%;이관상동맥주요분지위평개표준,가진단솔위96.88%;이관상동맥절단위평개표준,가진단솔위97.25%。기우환자64층라선 CT 관상동맥조영진단관심병적민감성위97.92%,특이성위90.32%,음성예측치위96.55%,양성예측치위94.00%;기우관상동맥주요분지적민감성위92.13%,특이성위95.93%,음성예측치위96.80%,양성예측치위90.11%;기우관상동맥절단적민감성위90.74%,특이성위98.87%,음성예측치위99.05%,양성예측치위89.09%。결론MSCT 관상동맥조영가이가고지평개관상동맥협착,능구작위사사관심병적무창성검사방법。
Objective To assess the diagnostic accuracy of 64-slice coronary computed tomography angiog-raphy for coronary artery disease (CAD).Methods Eight patients who were suspicious CAD underwent 64-slice CT coronary angiography and invasive coronary angiography was included.The positive predictive value (PPV),negative predictive value (NPV),sensitivity and specificity of MSCT were evaluated. Results Altogether 98.75% patient,96.88% coronary arteries and 97.25% coronary segments could be di-agnosed.PPV,NPV,sensitivity and specificity based on patients for the diagnosis of CAD were 94.00%, 96.55%,97.92% and 90.32% respectively.Based on vessels they were 90.11%,96.80%,92.13% and 95.93% respectively.Based on segments they were 89.09%,99.05%,90.74% and 98.87% respectively. Conclusion MSCT could be a non-invasive tool to evaluate CAD.