中国CT和MRI杂志
中國CT和MRI雜誌
중국CT화MRI잡지
Chinese Journal of CT and MRI
2015年
11期
66-69
,共4页
超声%MRI%CT%原发性胆囊癌
超聲%MRI%CT%原髮性膽囊癌
초성%MRI%CT%원발성담낭암
Ultrasound%MRI%CT%Primary Gallbladder Carcinoma
目的:分析超声、RMI、CT在诊断原发性胆囊癌中的应用价值。方法回顾性分析经手术病理证实的50例原发性胆囊癌患者影像学资料,所有患者均行超声检查,行CT检查40例,行MRI检查25例,观察分析各自影像学表现,同时与手术病理检查结果对照,比较三者原发性胆囊癌诊断正确率。结果与手术病理结果比较,超声、CT、MRI诊断相符率(正确率)分别为64.0%、73.3%、88.0%,MRI诊断正确率明显高于超声,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论超声、MRI、CT在原发性胆囊癌诊断中各有优缺点,其中MRI诊断相符率最高,超声诊断相符率最低。
目的:分析超聲、RMI、CT在診斷原髮性膽囊癌中的應用價值。方法迴顧性分析經手術病理證實的50例原髮性膽囊癌患者影像學資料,所有患者均行超聲檢查,行CT檢查40例,行MRI檢查25例,觀察分析各自影像學錶現,同時與手術病理檢查結果對照,比較三者原髮性膽囊癌診斷正確率。結果與手術病理結果比較,超聲、CT、MRI診斷相符率(正確率)分彆為64.0%、73.3%、88.0%,MRI診斷正確率明顯高于超聲,差異有統計學意義(P<0.05)。結論超聲、MRI、CT在原髮性膽囊癌診斷中各有優缺點,其中MRI診斷相符率最高,超聲診斷相符率最低。
목적:분석초성、RMI、CT재진단원발성담낭암중적응용개치。방법회고성분석경수술병리증실적50례원발성담낭암환자영상학자료,소유환자균행초성검사,행CT검사40례,행MRI검사25례,관찰분석각자영상학표현,동시여수술병리검사결과대조,비교삼자원발성담낭암진단정학솔。결과여수술병리결과비교,초성、CT、MRI진단상부솔(정학솔)분별위64.0%、73.3%、88.0%,MRI진단정학솔명현고우초성,차이유통계학의의(P<0.05)。결론초성、MRI、CT재원발성담낭암진단중각유우결점,기중MRI진단상부솔최고,초성진단상부솔최저。
Objective To analyze the application value of ultrasound, MRI and CT in the diagnosis of primary gallbladder carcinoma.Methods The imaging data of 50 patients with primary gallbladder carcinoma confirmed by operation and pathology were retrospectively analyzed. All patients underwent ultrasound examination. 40 cases underwent CT examination and 25 cases underwent MRI examination. The imaging findings were observed and analyzed, respectively. Meanwhile, the findings were compared with the results of operation and pathological examination. The accuracy of the three kinds of examinations in the diagnosis of primary gallbladder carcinoma was compared.Results Compared with operation and pathological results, the diagnostic accordant rates (accuracy) of ultrasound, CT and MRI were 64.0%, 73.3% and 88.0%. The diagnostic accuracy of MRI was significantly higher than that of ultrasound, and the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05).Conclusion Ultrasound, MRI and CT in the diagnosis of primary gallbladder carcinoma have their own advantages and disadvantages, and the diagnostic accordant rates of MRI was the highest while of ultrasound was the lowest.