CAJ | 학술논문

目的分析、评价各临床相关科室科研绩效评分,找出科研工作的薄弱点,以便采取针对性的措施,提升科研工作水平.方法采用聚类分析等方法,对2011-2013年39个临床相关科室科研工作绩效量化评分进行分析.结果 39个科室被聚为6类.6类学科之间具有很好的区分度.第1类科室科研项目、SCI论文、统计源论文的聚类中心分值分别为2.301、1.899、1.289,授权专利的分值为0.158;第2类科室科技成果、SCI论文的分值分别为2.838、0.973,科研项目的分值为-0.055;第3类科室科研项目、统计源论文、SCI论文、授权专利的分值分别为0.906、1.101、0.966、0.666,科技成果的分值为-0.330;第4类科室科研项目、SCI论文、授权专利的分值分别为-0.579、-0.181、-0.328;第5类科室科研项目、科技成果、统计源论文、SCI论文的分值分别为-0.213、-0.419、-0.317、-0.547;第6类科室5项指标的分值分别为-0.689、-0.475、-0.833、-0.796、-0,704.结论聚类分析能根据科研工作绩效指标的评分情况,较好地将科室划分为不同类型,总结出不同类型科室的特点,找出薄弱点,对科室的科研工作具有分类指导作用.
목적 분석、평개각림상상관과실과연적효평분,조출과연공작적박약점,이편채취침대성적조시,제승과연공작수평.방법 채용취류분석등방법,대2011-2013년39개림상상관과실과연공작적효양화평분진행분석.결과 39개과실피취위6류.6류학과지간구유흔호적구분도.제1류과실과연항목、SCI논문、통계원논문적취류중심분치분별위2.301、1.899、1.289,수권전리적분치위0.158;제2류과실과기성과、SCI논문적분치분별위2.838、0.973,과연항목적분치위-0.055;제3류과실과연항목、통계원논문、SCI논문、수권전리적분치분별위0.906、1.101、0.966、0.666,과기성과적분치위-0.330;제4류과실과연항목、SCI논문、수권전리적분치분별위-0.579、-0.181、-0.328;제5류과실과연항목、과기성과、통계원논문、SCI논문적분치분별위-0.213、-0.419、-0.317、-0.547;제6류과실5항지표적분치분별위-0.689、-0.475、-0.833、-0.796、-0,704.결론 취류분석능근거과연공작적효지표적평분정황,교호지장과실화분위불동류형,총결출불동류형과실적특점,조출박약점,대과실적과연공작구유분류지도작용.
Objective To understand the weakness of the research work by conducting a cluster analysis and evaluation of research performance of clinical departments.Such activity will be able us to take appropriate measures to enhance the research capacity.Methods The database including research performance scores of 39 clinical departments from 2011 to 2013 were analyzed using clustering analysis and analysis of variance methods.Results Thirty-nine departments were divided into 6 categories,and there was a difference among 6 categories.The clustering center scores of research project, SCI paper and statistical source paper in first class were 2.301, 1.899 and 1.289, while score of patent was 0.158.The scores of achievement and SCI paper in second class were 2.838 and 0.973, but scores of research project was-0.055.The scores of research project, SCI paper, statistical sources paper and patent in third class were 0.906, 1.101, 0.966 and 0.666, respectively, while score of achievement was-0.330.The scores of research project, SCI paper, patent in fourth class were -0.579,-0.181 and 0.328.The scores of research project, achievement, statistical sources paper and SCI paper in fifth class were-0.213,-0.419,-0.317 and-0.547.The scores of 5 indexes in sixth class were-0.689,-0.475,-0.833,-0.796 and-0.704.Conclusions The departments can be divided into different categories by clustering analysis according to the evaluating index scores of research performance.The characteristics and the weakness of various categories can be found out.There is a classification guideline to research work of different departments.