中国医学创新
中國醫學創新
중국의학창신
Medical Innovation of China
2015年
29期
101-103,104
,共4页
循证护理%手术室%急诊护理%临床应用
循證護理%手術室%急診護理%臨床應用
순증호리%수술실%급진호리%림상응용
Evidence-based care%Operation room%Emergency care%Clinical application
目的：探讨循证手术护理在手术室急诊患者护理中的临床应用效果，为提高急诊患者的护理水平提供理论基础。方法：回顾性分析本院2013年2月-2014年3月收治的100例手术室急诊患者，按照手术护理方式的不同将其随机分为对照组和试验组，每组各50例。对照组患者采用常规的护理方法，试验组患者在此基础上采用循证护理，对比分析两组患者的临床护理效果。结果：试验组患者的手术时间及术后恢复时间分别为（50.65±3.48）min、（5.47±1.62）d，均明显短于对照组的（69.47±3.62）min、（8.26±1.48）d，差异均有统计学意义（P<0.05）；试验组的护理满意度96.0%（48/50）明显高于对照组的72.0%（36/50），不良反应发生率4.0%（2/50）明显低于对照组的26.0%（13/50），差异均有统计学意义（P<0.05）。试验组患者的抑郁、焦虑、敌对、恐惧等评分均明显低于对照组，差异均有统计学意义（P<0.05）。结论：在手术室急诊护理中应用循证护理能够有效提高患者的护理质量，减少恢复时间，可有效地提高患者的护理满意度，降低不良反应的发生率，具有明显的临床实践价值，值得进一步推广和应用。
目的：探討循證手術護理在手術室急診患者護理中的臨床應用效果，為提高急診患者的護理水平提供理論基礎。方法：迴顧性分析本院2013年2月-2014年3月收治的100例手術室急診患者，按照手術護理方式的不同將其隨機分為對照組和試驗組，每組各50例。對照組患者採用常規的護理方法，試驗組患者在此基礎上採用循證護理，對比分析兩組患者的臨床護理效果。結果：試驗組患者的手術時間及術後恢複時間分彆為（50.65±3.48）min、（5.47±1.62）d，均明顯短于對照組的（69.47±3.62）min、（8.26±1.48）d，差異均有統計學意義（P<0.05）；試驗組的護理滿意度96.0%（48/50）明顯高于對照組的72.0%（36/50），不良反應髮生率4.0%（2/50）明顯低于對照組的26.0%（13/50），差異均有統計學意義（P<0.05）。試驗組患者的抑鬱、焦慮、敵對、恐懼等評分均明顯低于對照組，差異均有統計學意義（P<0.05）。結論：在手術室急診護理中應用循證護理能夠有效提高患者的護理質量，減少恢複時間，可有效地提高患者的護理滿意度，降低不良反應的髮生率，具有明顯的臨床實踐價值，值得進一步推廣和應用。
목적：탐토순증수술호리재수술실급진환자호리중적림상응용효과，위제고급진환자적호리수평제공이론기출。방법：회고성분석본원2013년2월-2014년3월수치적100례수술실급진환자，안조수술호리방식적불동장기수궤분위대조조화시험조，매조각50례。대조조환자채용상규적호리방법，시험조환자재차기출상채용순증호리，대비분석량조환자적림상호리효과。결과：시험조환자적수술시간급술후회복시간분별위（50.65±3.48）min、（5.47±1.62）d，균명현단우대조조적（69.47±3.62）min、（8.26±1.48）d，차이균유통계학의의（P<0.05）；시험조적호리만의도96.0%（48/50）명현고우대조조적72.0%（36/50），불량반응발생솔4.0%（2/50）명현저우대조조적26.0%（13/50），차이균유통계학의의（P<0.05）。시험조환자적억욱、초필、활대、공구등평분균명현저우대조조，차이균유통계학의의（P<0.05）。결론：재수술실급진호리중응용순증호리능구유효제고환자적호리질량，감소회복시간，가유효지제고환자적호리만의도，강저불량반응적발생솔，구유명현적림상실천개치，치득진일보추엄화응용。
Objective:To investigate the clinical application effect of evidence-based operation room nursing in the operation room emergency patient care,and provide a theoretical basis for improving the level of care for emergency patients.Method:100 emergency surgical patients in operation room of our hospital from February 2013 to March 2014 were retrospectively analyzed,they were randomly divided into the control group and the experimental group according to the different ways of surgical care,50 cases in each group.The patients in the control group were treated with routine care,while the patients in the experimental group were treated with routine care added evidence-based care.The clinical effects of the two groups were compared and analyzed.Result:The operative time and postoperative recovery time of the experimental group were (50.65±3.48)min,(5.47±1.62)d,which were significantly shorter than (69.47±3.62)min and (8.26±1.48)d of the control group,the differences were statistically significant(P<0.05).The nursing satisfaction of the experimental group was 96.0%(48/50),which was significantly higher than 72.0%(36/50) of the control group, the incidence of adverse reactions in the experimental group was 4.0%(2/50),which significantly lower than 26.0%(13/50) in the control group,the differences were statistically significant(P<0.05).The scores of depression,anxiety, hostility,fear in the experimental group were significantly lower than those in the control group,the differences were statistically significant(P<0.05).Conclusion:Application of evidence-based operation room nursing in the operation room emergency patient care can improve the quality of nursing care,decrease the postoperative recovery time,increase the satisfaction of emergency surgical patients,lower the incidence of adverse reactions,with obvious clinical practice value,it is worthy of further promotion and application.
