中国有色金属学报(英文版)
中國有色金屬學報(英文版)
중국유색금속학보(영문판)
Transactions of Nonferrous Metals Society of China
2015年
10期
3389-3398
,共10页
杨希英%郎利辉%刘康宁%郭禅
楊希英%郎利輝%劉康寧%郭禪
양희영%랑리휘%류강저%곽선
MK模型%韧性断裂准则%充液热成形%厚度法向应力
MK模型%韌性斷裂準則%充液熱成形%厚度法嚮應力
MK모형%인성단렬준칙%충액열성형%후도법향응력
MK model%ductile fracture criteria%warm hydroforming%through-thickness normal stress
将MK模型与韧性断裂准则相结合,提出预测不同温度下5A06-O铝合金板材成形极限的新模型。基于宽板弯曲试验,应用新的修正 MK 模型确定材料常数(C)和初始厚度不均度( f0)。通过提出的新模型计算得到20和200°C下的成形极限图。将板材厚度法向应力对成形极限的影响计入新模型,并嵌入Abaqus/Explicit中,进行筒形件充液成形并加以验证。结果表明:与传统MK模型对比可知,新模型预测的成形极限图与实验值更加接近;在20和200°C下,充液热成形模拟与实验之间的误差分别为8.23%和9.24%,验证了模型的有效性。
將MK模型與韌性斷裂準則相結閤,提齣預測不同溫度下5A06-O鋁閤金闆材成形極限的新模型。基于寬闆彎麯試驗,應用新的脩正 MK 模型確定材料常數(C)和初始厚度不均度( f0)。通過提齣的新模型計算得到20和200°C下的成形極限圖。將闆材厚度法嚮應力對成形極限的影響計入新模型,併嵌入Abaqus/Explicit中,進行筒形件充液成形併加以驗證。結果錶明:與傳統MK模型對比可知,新模型預測的成形極限圖與實驗值更加接近;在20和200°C下,充液熱成形模擬與實驗之間的誤差分彆為8.23%和9.24%,驗證瞭模型的有效性。
장MK모형여인성단렬준칙상결합,제출예측불동온도하5A06-O려합금판재성형겁한적신모형。기우관판만곡시험,응용신적수정 MK 모형학정재료상수(C)화초시후도불균도( f0)。통과제출적신모형계산득도20화200°C하적성형겁한도。장판재후도법향응력대성형겁한적영향계입신모형,병감입Abaqus/Explicit중,진행통형건충액성형병가이험증。결과표명:여전통MK모형대비가지,신모형예측적성형겁한도여실험치경가접근;재20화200°C하,충액열성형모의여실험지간적오차분별위8.23%화9.24%,험증료모형적유효성。
A modified MK model combined with ductile fracture criterion (DFC-MK model) is proposed to compute the forming limit diagrams (FLDs) of 5A06-O aluminum alloy sheet at different temperatures. The material constant (C) of ductile fracture criterion and initial thickness imperfection parameter (f0) at various temperatures are determined by using a new computing method based on wide sheet bending test. The FLDs at 20 and 200 °C are calculated through the DFC-MK model. The DFC-MK model, which includes the influence of through-thickness normal stress, is written into the subroutine VUMAT embedded in Abaqus/Explicit. The cylindrical cup hydroforming tests are carried out to verify the model. The results show that compared with experimental observations, the predicted FLDs based on DFC-MK model are more accurate than the conventional MK model;the errors between the simulations and experiments in warm hydroforming are 8.23%at 20 °C and 9.24%at 200 °C, which verify the effectiveness of the proposed model.