现代临床护理
現代臨床護理
현대림상호리
Modern Clinical Nursing
2015年
8期
66-70
,共5页
李智英%刘晓红%李素萍%黎月英%成守珍
李智英%劉曉紅%李素萍%黎月英%成守珍
리지영%류효홍%리소평%려월영%성수진
核心能力%儿科护理%岗位职责%评价标准
覈心能力%兒科護理%崗位職責%評價標準
핵심능력%인과호리%강위직책%평개표준
core ability%pediatric nursing%position responsibility%standard
目的:探讨构建以护士核心能力为基础的儿科护理岗位职责评价标准。方法采用德尔菲法方法,通过专家对各指标评分的变异系数和Kendall′s W协调系数来检验专家意见的协调程度;去除专家变异系数大及权重低的条目;并通过层级分析法,决定各要素的重要程度进行排序,建立适用于儿科护士岗位职责评价标准。结果儿科护理岗位职责评价标准共分3个项目,11个维度,33个条目的测评量表。专家的权威系数Cr在0.77~0.90,平均为0.88。专家对各项指标的变异系数较小,维持在0.013~0.136(<0.25);一级指标、二级指标、三级指标的Kendall′s W协调系数分别为0.482、0.552、0.438,协调系数比较,差异有统计学意义(P<0.001)。专家一致性高。结论本研究参与的专家积极性、专家权威程度较高,专家对儿科护理岗位职责审核标准结果的一致程度均较高,评价标准体系的可信程度较高,在儿科护理岗位职责评价中具有应用及参考价值。
目的:探討構建以護士覈心能力為基礎的兒科護理崗位職責評價標準。方法採用德爾菲法方法,通過專傢對各指標評分的變異繫數和Kendall′s W協調繫數來檢驗專傢意見的協調程度;去除專傢變異繫數大及權重低的條目;併通過層級分析法,決定各要素的重要程度進行排序,建立適用于兒科護士崗位職責評價標準。結果兒科護理崗位職責評價標準共分3箇項目,11箇維度,33箇條目的測評量錶。專傢的權威繫數Cr在0.77~0.90,平均為0.88。專傢對各項指標的變異繫數較小,維持在0.013~0.136(<0.25);一級指標、二級指標、三級指標的Kendall′s W協調繫數分彆為0.482、0.552、0.438,協調繫數比較,差異有統計學意義(P<0.001)。專傢一緻性高。結論本研究參與的專傢積極性、專傢權威程度較高,專傢對兒科護理崗位職責審覈標準結果的一緻程度均較高,評價標準體繫的可信程度較高,在兒科護理崗位職責評價中具有應用及參攷價值。
목적:탐토구건이호사핵심능력위기출적인과호리강위직책평개표준。방법채용덕이비법방법,통과전가대각지표평분적변이계수화Kendall′s W협조계수래검험전가의견적협조정도;거제전가변이계수대급권중저적조목;병통과층급분석법,결정각요소적중요정도진행배서,건립괄용우인과호사강위직책평개표준。결과인과호리강위직책평개표준공분3개항목,11개유도,33개조목적측평량표。전가적권위계수Cr재0.77~0.90,평균위0.88。전가대각항지표적변이계수교소,유지재0.013~0.136(<0.25);일급지표、이급지표、삼급지표적Kendall′s W협조계수분별위0.482、0.552、0.438,협조계수비교,차이유통계학의의(P<0.001)。전가일치성고。결론본연구삼여적전가적겁성、전가권위정도교고,전가대인과호리강위직책심핵표준결과적일치정도균교고,평개표준체계적가신정도교고,재인과호리강위직책평개중구유응용급삼고개치。
Objective To construct evaluation standards for pediatric nursing responsibility. Methods With the method of expert enquiry for Delphi, coefficient of variation of each index through expert grading and Kendall W′s coordination coefficient were used to test the coordination degree in opinions among experts. After the coefficient of larger variation and lower weight were removed , the elements of nursing duty were ranked based on the weight by using hierarchy analysis method. Results The established practical pediatric nurses responsibility evaluation standard consisted of 3 modules, with 11 dimensions and 33 items. The Cr expert authority coefficient was between 0.77~0.90, with an average of 0.88. The variation coefficient of each index was low, ranging between 0.013 0.135 (<0.25). The Kendall W′s coordination coefficients of the primary, secondary and tertiary indicators were 0.482, 0.552 and 0.438, respectively, with significant differences in the coordination coefficient (P<0.001). Conclusion The experts are active and authoritative in participating in the standard establishment and they highly agreed on the standard , which indicates that the established the standard is reliable in a higher degree.