华北水利水电大学学报(社会科学版)
華北水利水電大學學報(社會科學版)
화북수이수전대학학보(사회과학판)
Journal of North China University of Water Resources and Electric Power(Social Sciences Edition)
2015年
4期
17-24
,共8页
《刑法修正案(九)(草案二次审议稿)》%扰乱法庭秩序%司法公信力%法律职业共同体
《刑法脩正案(九)(草案二次審議稿)》%擾亂法庭秩序%司法公信力%法律職業共同體
《형법수정안(구)(초안이차심의고)》%우란법정질서%사법공신력%법률직업공동체
disturbing court order%public confidence in justice%terrorism%the legal community
《刑法修正案(九)》的草案及草案二审稿均对扰乱法庭秩序罪作出了修改,增加了殴打诉讼参与人以及侮辱、诽谤、威胁司法工作人员或者诉讼参与人,不听法庭制止等严重扰乱法庭秩序的情形,降低了入罪门槛. 这是在当前司法公正和司法公信力方面存在问题、审辩冲突激烈背景下,适时作出的调整. 通过对扰乱法庭秩序罪罪名渊源、修改过程的梳理,认为,为了维护司法权威、构建法律职业共同体,聚众哄闹、冲击法庭,殴打司法工作人员、诉讼参与人的行为,仍应达到严重扰乱法庭秩序的程度,方可入罪;应当将侮辱、诽谤、威胁司法工作人员或者诉讼参与人,不听法庭制止,严重扰乱法庭秩序的行为纳入扰乱法庭秩序罪的行为方式中,但同时,也必须在立法中明确"公然侮辱""恶意诽谤"和"以暴力相威胁"的标准;"其他扰乱法庭秩序行为"这一兜底性条款应当删除.
《刑法脩正案(九)》的草案及草案二審稿均對擾亂法庭秩序罪作齣瞭脩改,增加瞭毆打訴訟參與人以及侮辱、誹謗、威脅司法工作人員或者訴訟參與人,不聽法庭製止等嚴重擾亂法庭秩序的情形,降低瞭入罪門檻. 這是在噹前司法公正和司法公信力方麵存在問題、審辯遲突激烈揹景下,適時作齣的調整. 通過對擾亂法庭秩序罪罪名淵源、脩改過程的梳理,認為,為瞭維護司法權威、構建法律職業共同體,聚衆鬨鬧、遲擊法庭,毆打司法工作人員、訴訟參與人的行為,仍應達到嚴重擾亂法庭秩序的程度,方可入罪;應噹將侮辱、誹謗、威脅司法工作人員或者訴訟參與人,不聽法庭製止,嚴重擾亂法庭秩序的行為納入擾亂法庭秩序罪的行為方式中,但同時,也必鬚在立法中明確"公然侮辱""噁意誹謗"和"以暴力相威脅"的標準;"其他擾亂法庭秩序行為"這一兜底性條款應噹刪除.
《형법수정안(구)》적초안급초안이심고균대우란법정질서죄작출료수개,증가료구타소송삼여인이급모욕、비방、위협사법공작인원혹자소송삼여인,불은법정제지등엄중우란법정질서적정형,강저료입죄문함. 저시재당전사법공정화사법공신력방면존재문제、심변충돌격렬배경하,괄시작출적조정. 통과대우란법정질서죄죄명연원、수개과정적소리,인위,위료유호사법권위、구건법률직업공동체,취음홍료、충격법정,구타사법공작인원、소송삼여인적행위,잉응체도엄중우란법정질서적정도,방가입죄;응당장모욕、비방、위협사법공작인원혹자소송삼여인,불은법정제지,엄중우란법정질서적행위납입우란법정질서죄적행위방식중,단동시,야필수재입법중명학"공연모욕""악의비방"화"이폭력상위협"적표준;"기타우란법정질서행위"저일두저성조관응당산제.
The Ninth Criminal Law Amendment ( draft) reduces the threshold into sin by punishing such behavior which seriously disturbs the order of the court as beating participants and insulting, slandering, threating to the judicial officers or participants in the proceedings. Howevert, through the breach of the order of the court on charges of origin, the modification process of comb, at the same time, in order to safeguard judicial authority and build legal professional community,only such behavior reach the level of seriously dis-turbing the order of the court shall it be the punished as a crime. At the same time, the standards also must be clear in the legislation in "an affront to","malicious slander" and"to the threat of violence". The clause of other disrupt the order of the court should be de-leted.