中国药事
中國藥事
중국약사
Chinese Pharmaceutical Affairs
2015年
10期
1028-1031
,共4页
安慰剂效应%伦理%临床试验%康德哲学
安慰劑效應%倫理%臨床試驗%康德哲學
안위제효응%윤리%림상시험%강덕철학
placebo effect%ethics%clinical trials%Kant's philosophy
目的:探讨安慰剂使用的伦理困境与法理争议。方法:对使用安慰剂正反两方面的观点进行简要梳理,运用康德哲学思想进一步剖析安慰剂的伦理缺陷与公正缺失。结果与结论:在临床试验中使用安慰剂,违背了康德“人本身就是目的”的哲学思想,给受试者带来不合理的风险,亦违背了医学原则。为了降低安慰剂的不合理风险,应对临床试验进行更为科学的设计,保护每一位受试者的生命健康权。
目的:探討安慰劑使用的倫理睏境與法理爭議。方法:對使用安慰劑正反兩方麵的觀點進行簡要梳理,運用康德哲學思想進一步剖析安慰劑的倫理缺陷與公正缺失。結果與結論:在臨床試驗中使用安慰劑,違揹瞭康德“人本身就是目的”的哲學思想,給受試者帶來不閤理的風險,亦違揹瞭醫學原則。為瞭降低安慰劑的不閤理風險,應對臨床試驗進行更為科學的設計,保護每一位受試者的生命健康權。
목적:탐토안위제사용적윤리곤경여법리쟁의。방법:대사용안위제정반량방면적관점진행간요소리,운용강덕철학사상진일보부석안위제적윤리결함여공정결실。결과여결론:재림상시험중사용안위제,위배료강덕“인본신취시목적”적철학사상,급수시자대래불합리적풍험,역위배료의학원칙。위료강저안위제적불합리풍험,응대림상시험진행경위과학적설계,보호매일위수시자적생명건강권。
Objective:To focus on the ethical dilemma of placebo and its legal dispute.Methods: Both of the positive and negative views on the use of placebo were brielfy sorted out with the application of Kant's philosophy for further analysis. Results and Conclusion:The use of placebo in clinical trials violated Kant’s philosophicla principle “People end in itself” and the principles of medicine, and was subject to an unreasonable risk. In order to reduce the unreasonable risks in clinical trials and protect life and health of every subject, the clinical trials should be designed more scientiifcally.