铁道标准设计
鐵道標準設計
철도표준설계
Railway Standard Design
2015年
11期
131-134
,共4页
电气化铁路%接触网%回流线%避雷线%防雷
電氣化鐵路%接觸網%迴流線%避雷線%防雷
전기화철로%접촉망%회류선%피뢰선%방뢰
Electrified railway%Contact system%Reflux wire%Lightning conductor%Lightning protection
雷击将造成电气化铁路接触网绝缘子闪络,影响供电的可靠性。现有的研究表明,在直供方式中,接触网的绕击耐雷水平远低于其反击耐雷水平,因此架设避雷线有利于提高接触网的整体耐雷水平,减少雷击跳闸率。研究回流线升高兼做避雷线(方案1)与单独架设避雷线(方案2)对接触网防雷效果的影响。研究结果表明,当避雷线位置合适时,两种方案均能对承力索的绕击起到很好的保护作用。单独架设避雷线时,回流线与避雷线共同作用,增大与承力索的耦合系数,并对雷电流起到分流作用,从而提高接触网的感应耐雷水平与反击耐雷水平。因此方案2的感应雷耐受水平与反击雷耐受水平均略高于方案1,但总体投资要大于方案2,现场应根据雷害的严重程度及投资比较,选取合适的方案。
雷擊將造成電氣化鐵路接觸網絕緣子閃絡,影響供電的可靠性。現有的研究錶明,在直供方式中,接觸網的繞擊耐雷水平遠低于其反擊耐雷水平,因此架設避雷線有利于提高接觸網的整體耐雷水平,減少雷擊跳閘率。研究迴流線升高兼做避雷線(方案1)與單獨架設避雷線(方案2)對接觸網防雷效果的影響。研究結果錶明,噹避雷線位置閤適時,兩種方案均能對承力索的繞擊起到很好的保護作用。單獨架設避雷線時,迴流線與避雷線共同作用,增大與承力索的耦閤繫數,併對雷電流起到分流作用,從而提高接觸網的感應耐雷水平與反擊耐雷水平。因此方案2的感應雷耐受水平與反擊雷耐受水平均略高于方案1,但總體投資要大于方案2,現場應根據雷害的嚴重程度及投資比較,選取閤適的方案。
뢰격장조성전기화철로접촉망절연자섬락,영향공전적가고성。현유적연구표명,재직공방식중,접촉망적요격내뢰수평원저우기반격내뢰수평,인차가설피뢰선유리우제고접촉망적정체내뢰수평,감소뢰격도갑솔。연구회류선승고겸주피뢰선(방안1)여단독가설피뢰선(방안2)대접촉망방뢰효과적영향。연구결과표명,당피뢰선위치합괄시,량충방안균능대승력색적요격기도흔호적보호작용。단독가설피뢰선시,회류선여피뢰선공동작용,증대여승력색적우합계수,병대뇌전류기도분류작용,종이제고접촉망적감응내뢰수평여반격내뢰수평。인차방안2적감응뢰내수수평여반격뢰내수수평균략고우방안1,단총체투자요대우방안2,현장응근거뇌해적엄중정도급투자비교,선취합괄적방안。
Lightning often causes flashover of insulator of electrified railway and impacts the power supply reliability. The existing researches show that, in the direct supply, the lightning-proof when lightning strikes the contact line is far below than that when it strikes the grounding line. So the lightning conductor is beneficial to improving the overall lightning-proof level of the contact system and reducing tripping rate. In this paper, the effects of the two lightning conductor modes have been researched. One is to raise the reflux wire to serve as the lightning conductor and the other is to set up a new lightning protection line. The research results show that, if the position of the lightning conductor is suitable, the two modes can all provide good protection for the catenary. But in the second mode, reflux wire and the lighting conductor act simultaneously to increase the coupling coefficient of the catenary and take part in current diverging. Therefore, the lightning-proof level of the second mode is higher than that of the first mode and its overall investment is higher than the first one. So, the selection of the appropriate mode should be based on a comparison of investment and the severity of lightning.